Give the dead horse one more whack:
Desperado, TSPTalk readers, I am a first time poster, but I have been watching this site for a couple of years. I come here as part of my daily routine for the same reasons as all of you do - education and hearing others' perspectives. I really do like the website, and the information is interesting, but it does lean to the side of active (vs. passive) investing.
I have wanted to post something similar to Desperado's now notorious comment for a long time, but didn't know how to phrase it without sounding critical, contentious, or derogatory. It has received quite a vicious response from readers. Frankly, I was very disappointed on how quickly the tone of some responses turned negative. If we are all here to learn, unless you know it all, a reader should consider what others say. While the tone of Desperado’s comment may have sounded negative to some you, he does bring up a valid point: the site seems to encourage a highly active investment style.
As some of you have mentioned, market timing is a method used by some investors in attempt to beat the market. Its effectiveness it widely questioned. (Wikipedia’s page for market timing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_timing). I have dabbled in market timing myself and luckily was successful. Many of you are convinced that if you do your homework, active portfolio management will likely boost your returns. I am convinced the majority of market timing is a result of luck and statistically insignificant. I do not believe this blindly, and I do not consider my self a pawn of Wall St either. I want to boost the returns of my investments just a much as the next guy, but there are much better strategies than market timing.
For example, if effective market timing is a result of skill, How do several amateur investors who compete in the monthly tallies outperform the paid service run by a hedge fund guru? Do they know something he doesn’t, or have they had a few lucky trades? Believe what you want, but hopefully you might agree that predicting who will beat who next month is anybody’s guess. To me that seems like an unreliable and unproven strategy. For those who are happy to see RevShark cheerleading the market timing approach you might consider that folks like you who subscribe to his newsletter(s) put money straight in his pocket (and whoever else gets a cut) whether he produces a return or not. In contrast the few of us on here pitching passive investing have absolutely nothing to gain (or lose) from convincing market timers to change their ways.
As mentioned, the debate between passive and active portfolio management has been raging for a long time and probably won’t end anytime soon. For every prestigious economist that is referenced as a market timer, you could name another one who preeches passive investment strategies. (Perhaps even a few Noble Prize Laureates)
For those who are seriously interested maximizing investment returns I would suggest exploring strategic allocation passive investing, A good starting point for information would be
http://indexfunds.com/ (The “12 Step Program” for active investors, a free online book available on that website is a must read).. I believe many of the quotes used by Desperado can be found here.
Learning about investing and how to manage wealth is great, but to be fair to yourself, make sure you are getting a balanced education.
I have one additional remark. Those of you who are projecting TSP average returns of ~20% for the future and beyond, I might suggest developing a contingency plan if that falls through. I don’t mean to sound like a cynic, but I wish making money was that easy! With great likely hood you will soon agree with me.
I honestly hope discussions like this continue. This type of debate is exactly why I like tsptalk.com.
Respectfully,
Anton