Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
some financial reporters are not allowed to own or trade stox they have sec rules or corporate news rules controlling their activities.Ah! I know what I am trying to say:
Fact vs. fiction. More accurately, what is happening versus what we think will happen.
Oil @ $35/bbl at some unspecified time (or even a specified one) is too far removed, I think, to have any bearing on what I think the market will do.
If all of these newstuffs were that helpful, then reporters would be the richest people in the world.
Therefore...another thing I am trying to say, is that it seems to me that most news is of no real impact on the market. The hard part--and I think we are all trying to find the Holy Grail here--is determining which bits of information are relevent and when.
some financial reporters are not allowed to own or trade stox they have sec rules or corporate news rules controlling their activities.Ah! I know what I am trying to say:
Fact vs. fiction. More accurately, what is happening versus what we think will happen.
Oil @ $35/bbl at some unspecified time (or even a specified one) is too far removed, I think, to have any bearing on what I think the market will do.
If all of these newstuffs were that helpful, then reporters would be the richest people in the world.
Therefore...another thing I am trying to say, is that it seems to me that most news is of no real impact on the market. The hard part--and I think we are all trying to find the Holy Grail here--is determining which bits of information are relevent and when.
Hi Ocean,I'd like to say hello and introduce myself. I live in Oceanside, CA, and like you all, am a fed. I have been reading this web page for over a year but have never before posted.
That aside, I have recently gone 100% I. Yes it is dangerous, but in my estimation it is not a way to make money, but conserve what I have. There is inflationary pressure ahead. The dollar is under strain. If the fed raises rates, the economy will slow to near zero growth, perhaps even negative growth. My move into I only is a temporary hedge against inflation and the real drop in the worth of my fund dollars, NOT a way to make money. I know the I fund will not do well, but am guessing the dollar is under huge strain. Thus, I am betting that the I fund still grows due to the pressure on the dollar.
Of course. I would not consider a single news story as relevant to trading my tsp.Therefore...another thing I am trying to say, is that it seems to me that most news is of no real impact on the market. The hard part--and I think we are all trying to find the Holy Grail here--is determining which bits of information are relevent and when.
Oceansideguy,Thanks for the welcome guys. Hey, and that sea thing is Sigmund the sea monster, a very cheesy 70s kid tv show.
Then there are the bond insurers. Last week, the four major bond insurers announced they had almost $13 billion in exposure to credits that were in Katrina's path, almost $4 billion in New Orleans alone. There are going to be some interesting days ahead for these insurers, who since they began doing business in 1971 have said they underwrote business to a zero-loss standard. That is, these insurers collected premiums with the expectation that they would never have to pay claims.
teknobucks wrote:
Then there are the bond insurers. Last week, the four major bond insurers announced they had almost $13 billion in exposure to credits that were in Katrina's path, almost $4 billion in New Orleans alone. There are going to be some interesting days ahead for these insurers, who since they began doing business in 1971 have said they underwrote business to a zero-loss standard. That is, these insurers collected premiums with the expectation that they would never have to pay claims.
They are going to have to pay claims, perhaps lots of them
Am I reading this right??? This seems to be saying that even the Insurers didn't stop to think they were writing policies on Hurricane Territories???
Yes Grandma you read correctly. Actually the whole insurance system is based on statistics which is the idea that the more policies sold the less it costs to pay for that minor tragedy that may occur. So the bigger an insurance company gets the more they pocket. This basically is the reason insurance companies love the governments, state and federal, and why banks have insurance writers in house. Insurance companies would like nothing more than the government to require everyone to have insurance. Just as you already have in the car and housing or whenever you have a loan. This is where the real gravy is made. See insurances also can up rates as soon as they consider you a higher risk even though you may not have made a claim or had a claim against you. There is basically no system to stop them from price gouging the system such as there is when a gas station tries to gouge you on fuel prices. So what does the insurance companies do with the extra moola they have, basically they invest it just like you and I do. When the stock market dropped then insurance companies went back to the policy holders for more cash as their bottum line was getting hit.
here in florida we have an extra deductible for hurricane....similar to california's earthquake coverage.teknobucks wrote:Then there are the bond insurers. Last week, the four major bond insurers announced they had almost $13 billion in exposure to credits that were in Katrina's path, almost $4 billion in New Orleans alone. There are going to be some interesting days ahead for these insurers, who since they began doing business in 1971 have said they underwrote business to a zero-loss standard. That is, these insurers collected premiums with the expectation that they would never have to pay claims.
They are going to have to pay claims, perhaps lots of them
Am I reading this right??? This seems to be saying that even the Insurers didn't stop to think they were writing policies on Hurricane Territories???