userque's Account talk

I expect to have the tally finished within the next several hours for EbbCharts and I...The TNA Challenge.

Also, I expect to have a NUGT/DUST version of my NN ready for prime time by next Monday...assuming I have no problems scraping all of the historical data for ^GDM.

(TNA/TZA track the W4500 nicely. NUGT/DUST don't. Hence the need for a separate NN.)
 
EbbCharts,

For your records (let me know if you find that something's broke):):
20140623e.jpg
********************************************************
20140623u.jpg
 
hehe, i'll try to say so sooner for you next time:toung:

"Friends don't let friends buy and hold." I guess I have no friends and I can prove it. I have been a buy and hold investor since Summer of 2013. If you clue me in, you'll be my one and only friend. Thanks Bud! :toung:
 
"Friends don't let friends buy and hold." I guess I have no friends and I can prove it. I have been a buy and hold investor since Summer of 2013. If you clue me in, you'll be my one and only friend. Thanks Bud! :toung:

lol...I'm sure you've got plenty of friends:cool:...but one more can't hurt!:toung:
 
This may be a stupid questions but can you explain how Ebbcharts position is 100% accurate compared to your 83.33% but your rate of return is higher?

Good question.

Without looking at the chart, but explaining generally:

Ebb has been in cash more, and:

A trader can trade one day, be correct, and be at 100%

Another trader can trade all days, be right 70%, but that 70% could be all big moves, and therefore, have 'better' results.
 
Good question.

Without looking at the chart, but explaining generally:

Ebb has been in cash more, and:

A trader can trade one day, be correct, and be at 100%

Another trader can trade all days, be right 70%, but that 70% could be all big moves, and therefore, have 'better' results.

I knew it was a stupid question the minute I hit send. :laugh: That's for doing the thinking for me. ;)
 
I should note for the record that:

My NN doesn't evaluate the F-Fund. When it predicts a downturn in the S-Fund, it assumes the F-Fund will be a better option than the G-Fund. (As we all know, the may or may not be the actual case.) Then, after flowing to the F-fund, if it predicts an uptrend in the S-Fund, it will exit the F-fund and flow to the G-fund.

I eventually will modify it so that it uses actual F-fund data when it runs it's back-testing simulations.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top