Mike
Active member
imported post
saraho wrote:
I don't agree with the concept of backtesting. The underlying assumption of doing that is the previous market conditions are being repeated, thus you can say "this approach has a ___% chance of giving me a good return".
I don't see this situation as terribly bullish. Past earnings have been generally strong, but the market looks to the future - and that future will likely feature more modest earnings, rising interest rates, a continuing large trade deficit, a continuing large budget deficit, and perhaps a military conflict with Iran over its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. Oh yeah, oil prices are also high. The only thing going for us right now is steady 3-4% economic growth. Will that and slowing earnings growth be sufficient to overcome the rest? That's the battle being fought in the market right now.
saraho wrote:
You ought to backtest your "higher high" scenario and see what it would have gotten you in past years...
I don't agree with the concept of backtesting. The underlying assumption of doing that is the previous market conditions are being repeated, thus you can say "this approach has a ___% chance of giving me a good return".
I don't see this situation as terribly bullish. Past earnings have been generally strong, but the market looks to the future - and that future will likely feature more modest earnings, rising interest rates, a continuing large trade deficit, a continuing large budget deficit, and perhaps a military conflict with Iran over its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. Oh yeah, oil prices are also high. The only thing going for us right now is steady 3-4% economic growth. Will that and slowing earnings growth be sufficient to overcome the rest? That's the battle being fought in the market right now.