Corn and Ethanol.

Sort by newest Sort by date
You have a bad case of selective reading.

Let me highlight this for you:
...chicken prices are unlikely to rally in coming months,”
Click to expand...
the price YOU pay for chicken isn't going up.

Let's look at historic data:

Production of beef for the last ten years is flat:
[FONT=&quot]U.S. beef production (commercial carcass weight):
2002: 27.09 billion pounds
2003: 26.24 billion pounds
2004: 24.55 billion pounds
2005: 24.68 billion pounds
2006: 26.15 billion pounds
2007: 26.42 billion pounds
2008: 26.56 billion pounds
2009: 26.07 billion pounds [/FONT]


Production of chicken is flat:
[FONT=&quot]Chicken Production by year: [/FONT]
U.S. broiler meat production:
2005: 35.4 billion pounds
2006: 35.5 billion pounds
2007: 36.2 billion pounds
2008: 36.9 billion pounds
2009: 35.5 billion pounds


Amount of CORN Grown IS up over 30%
View attachment 10501

For each bushel of corn grown: that equals 2.7 gallons of ethanol, PLUS 11.4 pounds of gluten feed (20% protein) AND 3 pounds of gluten meal (60% protein) AND 1.6 pounds of corn oil.

The production of ethanol from corn uses only the starch of the corn kernel, all of the valuable protein, minerals and nutrients remain.

There is an abundance, not a shortage, of corn and corn animal feed products, as a result of ethanol production.
 
Seven Things That Will Cost More in 2011 and What You Can Do About Them

Ann Brenoff
feed_icon

Jan 7th 2011 at 6:00PM

e000212.jpg.jpg

Get ready to stretch your wallet. We're already seeing the signs of prices creeping up in just the infancy days of 2011. So be prepared to open wide for:

1. A Trip to the Grocery Store
The USDA forecasts a 2% to 3% hike in the cost of all foods in 2011. Higher corn and soybean prices are the main force behind the increase. Remember, farm animals have to be fed and when those costs go up, so does what you pay. Expect a big spike in the dairy case and meat counter, where pork alone is forecast to rise between 3% and 4%.

If it's any comfort, in 2008 food costs overall rose more than 5.5%. And you still didn't lose weight. (MORE) FUEL!!
http://www.walletpop.com/2011/01/07...ll-cost-more-in-2011-and-what-you-can-do-abo/
 
Its about time!

The ethanol industry doesn't need a subsidy now that refiners are required to use the biofuel, according to the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

The GAO lists the 45-cent-per-gallon tax credit among wasteful programs that could be slashed or eliminated to help address the nation's fiscal problems.
The tax credit, due to expire at the end of the year, will cost the government $5.4 billion this year, and the lost revenue will grow to $6.75 billion by 2015 if the credit is extended, the GAO said.

The tax credit goes to refiners and other gasoline blenders who are already required under federal law to use growing volumes of ethanol each year.

"The ethanol tax credit was important in helping to create a profitable corn starch ethanol industry when the industry had to fund investment in new facilities, but it is less important now for sustaining the industry because most of the capital investment in corn starch ethanol refineries has already been made," the GAO said.
Click to expand...

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110302/BUSINESS01/103020348/0/VIDEO06/?odyssey=nav|head
 
James48843 said:
You have a bad case of selective reading.

Let me highlight this for you:
the price YOU pay for chicken isn't going up.

Let's look at historic data:

Production of beef for the last ten years is flat:
[FONT=&quot]U.S. beef production (commercial carcass weight):
2002: 27.09 billion pounds
2003: 26.24 billion pounds
2004: 24.55 billion pounds
2005: 24.68 billion pounds
2006: 26.15 billion pounds
2007: 26.42 billion pounds
2008: 26.56 billion pounds
2009: 26.07 billion pounds [/FONT]


Production of chicken is flat:
[FONT=&quot]Chicken Production by year: [/FONT]
U.S. broiler meat production:
2005: 35.4 billion pounds
2006: 35.5 billion pounds
2007: 36.2 billion pounds
2008: 36.9 billion pounds
2009: 35.5 billion pounds


Amount of CORN Grown IS up over 30%
View attachment 10501

For each bushel of corn grown: that equals 2.7 gallons of ethanol, PLUS 11.4 pounds of gluten feed (20% protein) AND 3 pounds of gluten meal (60% protein) AND 1.6 pounds of corn oil.

The production of ethanol from corn uses only the starch of the corn kernel, all of the valuable protein, minerals and nutrients remain.

There is an abundance, not a shortage, of corn and corn animal feed products, as a result of ethanol production.
Click to expand...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYWqkun6JJg
 
Buster said:
I like the way you think..check out this discussion:

http://www.tsptalk.com/mb/showpost.php?p=303463&postcount=9101
Click to expand...

If you read any of Matt Taibbi's Griftopia America for Sale: An Exclusive Excerpt from Matt Taibbi’s New Book on the Economic Meltdown, it is plain to see the Middle East has amassed their wealth to buy in to any industry or American asset (can you say Wisconsin public power plants) using US contacts as brokers, hiding their identities, way into the future, to offset any potential loss of oil revenue.

The fact that we will transition away from ME oil will mean that no other country has the resources to pay the high price that we as an "affluent" country OPEC has paid for our lifestyle of convenience, and thusly, while oil may not 'run-out' the resale price will still be restricted to what the market will bear, so the Saudi's must hedge.
 
Taking that video as god's honest truth for a minute, look at the modifications the guy did. Which is fine, they're not that expensive, but I noticed he wasn't actually farming. He was driving. Put a plow on that thing, then rev it up to a "working" rpm and go plow some ground and watch your precious ethanol theories go up in smoke.


Love those old tractors, though.
 
Minnow said:
Taking that video as god's honest truth for a minute, look at the modifications the guy did. Which is fine, they're not that expensive, but I noticed he wasn't actually farming. He was driving. Put a plow on that thing, then rev it up to a "working" rpm and go plow some ground and watch your precious ethanol theories go up in smoke.


Love those old tractors, though.
Click to expand...

You Go Minnow :toung:
 
Minnow said:
Taking that video as god's honest truth for a minute, look at the modifications the guy did. Which is fine, they're not that expensive, but I noticed he wasn't actually farming. He was driving. Put a plow on that thing, then rev it up to a "working" rpm and go plow some ground and watch your precious ethanol theories go up in smoke.


Love those old tractors, though.
Click to expand...
I maybe wrong..But I believe these tractors where as Jim said, made to run on Ethanoil or Gasoline..but the way it was explained to me by an old John Deere collector, was that they were made to burn this kind of fuel ONLY for starting purposes..once the motor was up and running they flipped a valve over to Farm fuel or Diesel for the actual work run.
 
Buster said:
I maybe wrong..But I believe these tractors where as Jim said, made to run on Ethanoil or Gasoline..but the way it was explained to me by an old John Deere collector, was that they were made to burn this kind of fuel ONLY for starting purposes..once the motor was up and running they flipped a valve over to Farm fuel or Diesel for the actual work run.
Click to expand...

I'll save Jim the trouble and you the aggravation -- the first diesels for deeres didn't show up until the '40s. No biggie the deere collector is right about the valves on most of those tractors and some of the earlier ones.

But if you look at the video, the fuel tank and some hoses have been modified to prevent vapor lock. The more modern fuel pump is in a different location than the original. But, the fuel filter is the video tractor's problem. Looks to me like it has no heat shield, and that will get you about 75 yards (doing real farm work -- higher revs) before the sputtering begins and then POW. And if that didn't get the tractor, not all the fuel lines look aluminized and that'll get him too maybe before the lack of a heat shields does.

He could probably pull 4 or 5 kids on a small cart for a hay ride, and claim success though. :laugh:
 
I guess this was what I was thinking...

Engine and fuels:
Click to expand...
The predecessors of modern tractors, traction engines, used steam engines for power. Since the turn of the 20th century, internal combustion engines have been the power source of choice. Between 1900 and 1960, gasoline was the predominant fuel, with kerosene and ethanol being common alternatives. Generally one engine could burn any of those, although cold starting was easiest on gasoline. Often a small auxiliary fuel tank was available to hold gasoline for cold starting and warm-up, while the main fuel tank held whatever fuel was most convenient or least expensive for the particular farmer.
Click to expand...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractor
 
Granny's Corn squeezings may be fine for Jethro's truck but I aint putting that slop in my fuel injection engines.

92 Octane until I cant afford it no more. :D
 
FAB1 said:
Granny's Corn squeezings may be fine for Jethro's truck but I aint putting that slop in my fuel injection engines.

92 Octane until I cant afford it no more. :D
Click to expand...

My Jag uses 93 octane and I can only find it at a Shell station @ $4.05/gal:embarrest:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

NewsFeeder
Cocoa prices hit $10,000 per metric ton for the first time ever
Replies
1
Views
95
mmk119
M
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - Stocks face new policies, a debt ceiling, and liquidity
Replies
0
Views
150
tsptalk
tsptalk
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - Stocks pull back and the Fed sounds less dovish
Replies
0
Views
154
tsptalk
tsptalk
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - Small caps and high beta investments are on the move
Replies
0
Views
175
tsptalk
tsptalk
RevShark
  • Article Article
RevShark's TSP Timing Changes
Replies
0
Views
150
RevShark
RevShark
Back
Top