coolhand's Account Talk

Into Thinner Air
Last Update: 08-Jun-09 08:16 ET

http://www.briefing.com/GeneralCont...me=Investor&ArticleId=NS20090608081637PageOne

Green shoots are everywhere -- or so it would seem based on the market's bullish bias that has been plainly evident in rising stock prices, rising commodity prices, and rising Treasury yields. The question is, do those green shoots have roots?

Anyone familiar with the parable of the sower knows that seeds that fall on rocky ground where there isn't much soil will soon spring up, but eventually get scorched when the sun rises and will wither away, while seeds that fall on good soil will bring forth grain, some a hundredfold, some sixty, and some thirty.

The prevailing view now is that the green shoots are springing from good soil. That thinking has brought forth a 41% gain for the S&P 500 since the March low.

Still, we couldn't help but wonder in the latest week, with the market rallying in the wake of a GM bankruptcy filing and the report that real PCE -- the driver of GDP -- declined -0.1% in April, whether the market might not just be looking for green shoots, but might also be starting to smoke them, too, when it finds them.

When everyone is focused on one thing, though, everyone will see the same thing. To that end, the market has been locked in to thinking about what's next on a linear recovery path, as opposed to thinking what if the recovery path is obstructed by a roadblock or two... or three, or four.

Accordingly, the rise in commodity prices is only being interpreted today as a function of increased demand that is going to coincide with a pickup in the global economy. The rise in Treasury yields is only being seen as an unwinding of the risk aversion trade and a tactical reallocation into stocks as the recovery view predominates.

What if, though, commodity inflation is ahead of its time and simply brings higher prices -- before a genuine pickup in demand -- that taxes the consumer further? What if rising Treasury yields choke off the mortgage refinancing boom and curtail home purchase activity further because they lessen the affordability factor?

What if unemployment continues to increase, as it most likely will, and feeds a further deterioration in credit quality that forestalls the housing recovery and crimps banks' profitability? What if the inevitable inventory restocking phase is just a restocking phase to meet base level demand as opposed to a genuine rebuilding phase to meet a sustained pickup in aggregate demand?

What if the deficit can't be tamed like the Obama Administration thinks it can? The spike in the unemployment rate to 9.4% in May brought the 2009 average unemployment rate to 8.48%, which is above the 8.1% average factored in the White House deficit projection for FY09.

There are any number of "what if" roadblocks out there. They may come to fruition or they may not. Our concern right now isn't so much that we are right or wrong in identifying the roadblocks, as it is that the market doesn't even seem to be entertaining the idea that it could encounter such roadblocks.

This suggests to us that the complacency factor has moved from base camp up to a higher altitude where the air is thinner.

Naturally, we've seen a rise in bullish investor advisor sentiment readings during this rally. At 47.6%, bullish sentiment is at its highest level since early January, or just before the unnerving first quarter sell off.

Conditions are better today than they were then, so we're not suggesting any type of similar action, but it does raise a caution flag as to how much further the market can extend the green shoots rally that blossomed in the spring but is now moving into the summer months when the sun can be scorching.

We hate sounding like a broken record, but when you have a view, you need to stick to it when you haven't seen compelling evidence to change it. We continue to envision a range-bound trade for the S&P (825-1000) during the summer months and would be looking to lighten up on positions that have made outsized moves, or at least working to insure them, while maintaining core positions.

As of this posting, the S&P futures are indicating the market will open the session with a loss of about 0.9%.

--Patrick J. O'Hare, Briefing.com
 
I don't know...that end of day rally feels suspicious. The bulls are trained to buy dips right now. Note the minor pullback at the close.

Tomorrow should be interesting. I'm not so sure the selling is done, but I'm not anticipating anything dramatic if it's not.
 
I've got another short term sell signal. Probably because of Weird Wolly Wednesday tomorrow, which is the day that they like to whip the market around (usually down) in order to re-position for options expiration week.

This kind of activity is very tricky to IFT around in TSP accounts. It's been tough anyway, given the bounces we've been seeing at the close.
 
Looking at ^TNX... the bondholders may be doing some work before the 10-year auctions tomorrow also... do they know something we don't?
 
It looks like more program trading - messing with the chart slaves. And that's just fine with me - staying long regardless.
 
It looks like more program trading - messing with the chart slaves. And that's just fine with me - staying long regardless.

I think fear is now equalized on both sides, thus sideways trading.

It's a simplistic concept, but it's probably part of the equation.

Neither bulls nor bears are making any real headway, although the bulls still have the advantage as we're still technically in an uptrend.
 
June 10, 2009
REPRICING THE FUTURE

http://www.capitalspectator.com/archives/2009/06/repricing_the_f.html#more

Arthur Laffer advises in today's Wall Street Journal that it's time to "Get Ready for Inflation and Higher Interest Rates." The market's been telling us no less, as we've been discussing now for some time. Although the deflationary risk has been front and center since the financial crisis erupted last fall, the bigger challenge has always been the next phase, once the Federal Reserve succeeds in driving away the D risk.

One need only review the market's changing forecast of inflation in recent months to recognize that the future isn't likely to look like the past. In charts we've been posting semi-regularly, such as here and here,, the trend is clear: pricing power is returning. Yes, it's coming off an extraordinarily low base, which exacerbates the relative comparisons. But there's no question that the central bank has been using extraordinarily potent measures to resuscitate inflation from the grave. As we've been saying all along, we have every confidence that Ben Bernanke and company will be successful.


The market is increasingly of a mind to agree, as indicated by rising interest rates this spring in government bonds. The benchmark 10-year Treasury, for instance, now yields 3.86%, as of last night—161 basis points above 2008's close, according to data from the U.S. Treasury.

Meanwhile, the futures market is predicting that by this time next year, Fed funds will be at ~1.2%, up from the current target rate of 0-0.25%.

So far, the rise in rates and rate expectations is a good thing, as it suggests that economic equilibrium is returning and the appetite for risk is on the mend. But at some point it's time to start soaking up the massive liquidity that the Fed has created in the past year. Reasonable minds can debate on exactly when to begin and how far to go, but at some point, and perhaps fairly soon, the monetary equivalent of mopping up must commence.

Laffer's skeptical that reversing the liquidity injections will be reversed in a timely manner, if at all. "Alas, I doubt very much that the Fed will do what is necessary to guard against future inflation and higher interest rates," he writes.

We're not quite so pessimistic, although the history of central banking certainly offers plenty of reason to remain cautious on expecting that politically tough decisions will come easy. Indeed, one must be cognizant of the incentives that infuse a world of fiat money and mounting deficits and the political path of least resistance. As Milton Friedman once said, "Inflation is the one form of taxation that can be imposed without legislation."
 
Geeee, if Harry Clark can get a Dow of 12,000 by the end of September I should be able to get a Dow of 17,000 by the end of December. A little shock and awe would be positive.
 
Geeee, if Harry Clark can get a Dow of 12,000 by the end of September I should be able to get a Dow of 17,000 by the end of December. A little shock and awe would be positive.

If they can do that, I'll have at least 2 out of 5 accounts exposed to it. But I'll be darned if I'd bet the farm on it. :D
 
Back
Top