tsptalk's Market Talk

This was what I was waiting for - a break above the descending resistance, or a break down from it making a lower high, as JTH said. I was mostly on defense going into today, but regrettably, now I have to get fully defensive.

The problem with playing defense here is that very low consumer sentiment number is usually pretty good contrarian indicator, and that Rydex Ratio is screaming short-term buy. Nothing is easy. :rolleyes:
 
This was what I was waiting for - a break above the descending resistance, or a break down from it making a lower high, as JTH said. I was mostly on defense going into today, but regrettably, now I have to get fully defensive.

The problem with playing defense here is that very low consumer sentiment number is usually pretty good contrarian indicator, and that Rydex Ratio is screaming short-term buy. Nothing is easy. :rolleyes:

I see today as a tough day to make a full exit. Good BP news could swell up over the weekend and provide a nice Monday pop. But then again I'm probly overthinking this...:cool:
 
This was what I was waiting for - a break above the descending resistance, or a break down from it making a lower high, as JTH said. I was mostly on defense going into today, but regrettably, now I have to get fully defensive.

The problem with playing defense here is that very low consumer sentiment numbers are usually pretty good contrarian indicators, and that Rydex Ratio is screaming short-term buy. Nothing is easy. :rolleyes:

One just can't get cute in this bi-polar market with such limited trading options. I fully expect continued volatility and bearish news in the foreseeable future.
 
Lower highs, rejected twice by the downtrend, 50/200 cross (which contrary to contrarian thought is a bearish), sentiment BULLISH. I don't know. This might be a market for day traders but there is a profound headwind right now. Anybody who's ever ridden a bicycle many miles into a headwind knows that it's not much fun.

Unless a kick save by the HFT's and other idiots who have written mutually assured destruction into their short term time frames, then we can count on a bearish shooting star reversal on the weekly majors. So far volume looks better this week than last (though still weak.)

A thought on sentiment- Sometimes when people are rushing the exits there really is a dangerous fire going. Sentiment told us to buy in November 2008 all the way to March 2009 and that was some serious drawdown.

BP's problems have only just begun.

Treasuries yields have continued to drop even in the wake of a few up days.
 
A thought on sentiment- Sometimes when people are rushing the exits there really is a dangerous fire going. Sentiment told us to buy in November 2008 all the way to March 2009 and that was some serious drawdown.
Good point. We are at 1 to1 bulls to bears right now, and we'd need to get all the way down to 0.50 to 1 before our sentiment systems buys again.
 
It's just another day of the market pricing in uncertainty with fear - so what else is new. No panic on my side of the street yet - Monday we take it all back and then some.
 
Found this on the CBOE website:
http://www.schaeffersresearch.com/c...blog.aspx?c=tfbfeed&blogid=101052&single=true

7/14/2010 9:36 AM
Market bulls looking for more evidence that we could be in for additional gains
going forward may be encouraged by a recent losing streak in the CBOE Market Volatility Index (VIX).
Specifically, the VIX endured a seven-session losing streak from June 30 through July 12,
with the index shedding a hefty 29.27% during this time frame.
The streak would have continued to eight straight losses, save for a late session rally in the VIX yesterday afternoon.

So, what are the implications of the VIX's recent plunge?
Well, the SPX responded by soaring 1.54% on Tuesday, but a study by Schaeffer's Quantitative Analyst
Chris Prybal suggests that the market could be in for a pretty decent run higher.
In fact, as you can see in the table below, the SPX averages a 42-day return of nearly 4%
in the wake of a seven-session VIX losing streak.
-more at link-
 
http://www.fool.com/investing/gener...freak-out.aspx?source=ihpsitota0000001&lidx=1

Foolishness demands that we don't overreact to short-term news. Still, it often pays to watch the headlines; they can reveal what's not so wise about the wisdom of crowds, and help us figure out where our next opportunity may be. Here are three of the reasons to freak out that I'm watching today:
1. Google obeys the law of financial physics
In a rare Wall Street disappointment yesterday, Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) managed to actually miss earnings estimates by a few pennies a share, producing a measly $6.45 instead of the $6.52 to which Mr. Market felt entitled. Sadly, even Google can't grow at better than 25% all the time. It's already giant. And it's only got one line of business, which it already dominates.
The problem is, of course, Google's inability to diversify. While the press constantly throws the word "innovation" at the company, there's honestly nothing all that innovative -- or bottom-line-building -- about buying small, bolt-on Internet services and putting your name on them; giving out free phone operating systems (also bought, not developed); or letting Interneters use free versions of office productivity programs with 15-year-old functionality.
Despite a lot of hiring (enough to worry analysts), it's also falling behind in some places it used to lead. See Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT) Bing maps and search, from which Google has started to crib ideas lately. For now, Google is the world's powerful advertising broker, and nothing more for now. Some shareholders are sure to freak out when they comprehend the obvious.
2. Goldman must obey the rules of fair financial dealings ... whatever those are
Goldman Sachs
(NYSE: GS) will pay a huge (but not record) fine for duping investors in a Frankenstein's-monster mortgage-securities derivative custom-built for billionaire hedge-fund client John Paulson to short.
Under fire from the SEC and in court, the firm finally coughed up $550 million and acknowledged its "mistake" -- namely, claiming in its marketing materials that its synthetic mortgage bond was created independently by a third-party Dr. Frankenstein. In fact, Paulson, who made billions shorting the housing bubble, was giving direct input on the bond's contents, thereby increasing the odds that he'd score when the thing went bonkers and tore up those who took the long side.
After swearing up and down that Goldman had done nothing wrong -- how could it, since he previously swore that the company does "God's Work"? -- CEO Loyd Blankfein managed to keep his job, and the firm didn't have to admit any wrongdoing, as is usual on these occasions. I think the only reason Goldman caved and paid up was because it needs a steady supply of villagers to feed its stitched-together creatures. It's hard to sign them up if stories of their financial dismemberment keep gracing the front pages of the newspapers.
3. The unintended consequences start now
Everyone sensible agrees that we need some kind of regulatory overhaul to interrupt the current status quo. Right now, firms like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Citigroup (NYSE: C) privatize profits based on horrible decision-making, then benefit from trillions of dollars in taxpayer-backed loans and indirect monetary stimulus when their horrible decisions come back to wreck the economy. Unfortunately, sensible people aren't in charge of making the changes. Politicians are.
Much of the newly passed financial reform bill looks great in concept: disallowing banks from making gambles with their own money; tighter restrictions on derivatives which formed the shadow banking industry; and a consumer finance watchdog charged with making sure burger-flippers making $13,000 don't sign up for $300,000 mortgages. But according to the Wall Street Journal, there are now 10 agencies charged with translating more than 2,000 pages of outline into even more pages of specific rules, and they'll be getting heat from well-heeled financial-industry lobbyists the entire way. I guarantee there are 30 to 300 more reasons to freak out as a result of this bill. We just won't see them for years ... until the next crisis reveals them.
 
7/19/10

The Dow Transports and small caps are down today. Just an observation.


Tom, I'll add that over several of the last waves, I have noticed both the Transports & Small Caps acting as the first indicator of trend direction.
 
The Dow, Transports and Nasdaq are all back above their 200-day EMA. The S&P is still just below it.

The Transports are up 4% as I write this.
 
Currently the SPX is at 1094.26 - I think we are there. Now all we have to do is buy and hold for the close. Tomorrow we may get a follow through day and then all hell breaks loose.
 
That has not happened on a friday in a while which would absolutely scare the hell out of the bear.
Interesting, because I was thinking how this feels to me like a bull-trap to me. Nothing but bad news all morning on "The News", and IMO the bears are plenty scared now. Barnanke pretty obviously yesterday "created" plenty of bearsh sentiment - hence today's action - but will it hold?/ continue? :suspicious:;)
 
Back
Top