Taking its Time

I really expected to see a negative close today, but the market closed mixed instead, seesawing above and below the flat line.

Today's data points did little to stir trading and gives me the impression the market is more interested in Friday's nonfarm payroll report and unemployment rate before it makes any big moves in one direction or the other.

For today, the ADP report revealed 84,000 jobs were lost in December, a tad bit more than the 75,000 that was expected.

The December ISM Service Index bumped up to 50.1 from the 48.7 in November, but it was still below the 50.5 average forecast.

Even the FOMC meeting minutes, which showed some members feel more stimulus might be needed did little to move the market.

The dollar did give back the 0.2% gain from yesterday though, dropping by that same amount today.

I continue to think the market is ripe for some profit taking in at least the short term. The Seven Sentinels appear to be saying the same thing. Here's today's charts:

$NAMO.jpg

NAMO dropped further into sell territory while NYMO ticked up just a bit while remaining on a buy. NAHL dipped just a bit while NYHL pushed higher.

$TRIN.jpg

TRIN and TRINQ remained on a buy while BPCOMPQ continued to ebb higher in buy territory.

For new readers who may not be familiar with the Seven Sentinels system, here are the general rules:

NAMO, NYMO, NAHL, and NYHL:

A daily reading above the 6 Day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) is buy mode, and a reading below the same is sell mode.

TRIN and TRINQ:

A daily reading below the 13 Day EMA is a buy signal, a reading above the 13 Day EMA is a sell signal.

BPCOMPQ:

A positive signal crossing of the top or lower bollinger band constitutes a buy signal. A negative crossing of the top or lower bollinger band constitutes a sell signal. It stays in a buy or sell mode until it recrosses in the opposite direction.

For the system to issue a buy signal all seven signals must go to a buy concurrently. The opposite is true for a sell. A seven signals must go to sell mode concurrently. Once a buy or sell signal is achieved it cannot be reversed until all seven signals align in the opposite direction again.

Allocation by fund ~ 2009 Chart 3.jpg

Here's the first data point for the new trading year from our Top 50. There's really not much to be learned from this expect stocks were the place to be the first week of January (so far).

2010 Fund Allocation ~ Top 15 Chart 3.jpg
Total Cash-Stock Exp ~ Top 15 Chart 1.jpg

We did have some movement with the Top 15. They raised more cash. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks we're due for some selling pressure.

So the Seven Sentinels remain on a buy, but the charts continue to look toppy. I'm expecting some selling pressure to kick in any day now, but that's just my expectation. It also remains to be seen if the declines are going to be as fast and hard as the rallies, which is what we saw so many times last year.

I have been trying to predict buy and sell signals with the Seven Sentinels due to the extreme volatility we'd see on reversals and I have had a lot of success doing that. I certainly hope my chart reading continues to be successful in this new year.
 
it is kindof a shock to see where the toppers are compared to where we are used to seeing them. I suppose that is partly because we were unable to see the IFTs as they occurred? I will have to re-think my decision to try to stay invested this time 'round. Thank you much for your analysis, etc. -grandma
 
grandma;bt948 said:
it is kindof a shock to see where the toppers are compared to where we are used to seeing them. I suppose that is partly because we were unable to see the IFTs as they occurred? I will have to re-think my decision to try to stay invested this time 'round. Thank you much for your analysis, etc. -grandma

They were there grandma, but because there were so many buy and holders the movment of the top 50 was pretty limited. What the top 50 showed us was that the buy and hold strategy worked very well last year, but many of the folks who had great returns in 2009 did not do so well in 2008. Buy and hold means taking the good with the bad.

The top 15 is made up of folks who did well in both 2008 and 2009 and seemed unafraid of making some IFTs and moving their money around. In fact, of the top 8 perfomers between 2008 and 2009, none was a buy and holder. I thought that was telling. So we should see more movement in the top 15 chart than we'd ever see in a top 50.
 
Ahh - that certainly makes a difference. And I do recall you had mentioned at sometime or other about separating the B&H from the others in the top.
Is there an easy way to see who & where are the top 15 ? - I've tried sorting at the `allocation' counter, but that isn't working. You had posted elsewhere a comment `not revealing...' but I kinda thought they'd be listed here somewhere. Maybe you were speaking of something else? Thank you.:)
 
grandma;bt950 said:
Ahh - that certainly makes a difference. And I do recall you had mentioned at sometime or other about separating the B&H from the others in the top.
Is there an easy way to see who & where are the top 15 ? - I've tried sorting at the `allocation' counter, but that isn't working. You had posted elsewhere a comment `not revealing...' but I kinda thought they'd be listed here somewhere. Maybe you were speaking of something else? Thank you.:)

I do not want to influence the trading pattern of those top 15 in any way by revealing who I selected. I did tell Poolman he was ranked #1 in my breakout, but that's as much as I'll reveal until later this year. ;)
 
Back
Top