Market Talk

imported post

The dollar didn't get any sustained direction from U.S. economic data Friday that showed weaker-than-expected U.S. income and spending for August, an uptick in a key inflation measure, better than-expected Chicago-region manufacturing and a drop in September consumer sentiment. Overnight, the dollar had traded higher versus the euro, on continued optimism over prospects for higher U.S. interest rates following hawkish comments Thursday from Federal Reserve Bankof Philadelphia President Anthony Santomero.

But buyers stepped in again each time the euro pushed below $1.2000, rejecting a key technical level that has become an increasingly stubborn barrier this week. Some investors suggest that the repeated failure to push the euro below $1.20 is a sign that the dollar rally of recent weeks might have run its course. Others say traders are merely condsolidating their dollar holdings ahead of the next advance for the U.S. currency.

Overnight, the yen got an early boost after data showing Japanese industrial production rose in August, while the jobless rate fell slightly. But things turned around when the dollar failed to stick below 113 yen level.
 
imported post

From the Bloomberg article and recent trends I've decided to reduce my F Fund allocation to a small amount: 6%.

The G Fund I've upped to 14%.
 
imported post

I've been reading some of the stuff the talking heads have been putting out and it is so negative its enough to make a contrarian tingle with glee. October should be a good month if the so called negative vibes persist.

Since the mid 1940's, the market has been very strong the 1st week of October during the 1st year of the presidential cycle. It appears the seasonal bias is trumping the technical indicators.

Also, the spread between the yield on the 10-year Treasury note and the yield on the two-year note is roughly 15 basis points. During the past two decades, that has been a signal that chances were quite good that high-quality stocks would outperform lower-quality ones on a six month and 12 month time horizon. Lower quality stocks generally have outperformed higher quality ones so far this year. S fund versus C fund. That's odd, based on the historical pattern, particularly at a time when overall earnings growth is slowing. Moreover, lower-quality stocks have a hefty valuation premium vs higher-quality ones.
 
imported post

Birchtree wrote:
The I fund had a good September run, foreign speculators may be getting ready to take some profits for a few weeks - wouldn't hurt to step back a bit if you are a trader - long termers just ride through it and accumulate - IMHO.
if the repos were not above 20billion/day avg. i would be in complete agreement Dennis......http://www.omo.co.nz/Plots-TIO.htm

I fund should continue to run like a 67 fiat spider....
67fiat01.jpg
 
imported post

3Q Wrap up for the S&P: Who won? Who lost?
Stocks posted solid gains but rising energy prices made the third quarter tough. What's next?
October 1, 2005: 7:01 AM EDT
By Alexandra Twin, CNN/Money staff writer

3q_sp.gif
3q_sp_sectors.gif


NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The stock market chalked up solid gains for the third quarter but rising energy prices made it a rocky ride.

The rest of the year may not be much easier.

For the quarter, the Nasdaq jumped 4.6 percent, the S&P 500 gained 3.2 percent and the Dow industrials climbed nearly 2.9 percent.

That's a bit better than average. Yet, most of those gains came in July and late September, with the rest of the quarter plagued by murky sentiment and volatile trading.

"I'd characterize third-quarter stock performance as disappointing and event-driven, although it was understandable why the market reaction was what it was," said William Hummer, principal at money manager Wayne Hummer, Inc.

Hummer was referring the surge in oil prices in August and September, the pair of rate hikes we got from the Federal Reserve and the one-two punch of hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Granted, even without all of this, the period wasn't expected to be particularly positive for stocks. September is usually the worst month for the three major averages, according to the Stock Trader's Almanac, and August and October aren't much better.

But this year was a little different. Stocks were more upbeat than usual in the often upbeat month of July, then sputtered for the rest of the quarter. Strip that out and you'd have a much more negative picture.

Stocks jumped that month as investors breathed a sigh of relief that second-quarter earnings were stronger than initial expectations. Hopes that the Fed might pause in its interest-rate hiking campaign and a certain "head in the sand" take on rising oil prices helped.

Yet the optimism faded come August, with worries beginning to surface about the economy heating up too fast. Then Katrina and Rita hit, and that added to the uncertainty, said Subodh Kumar, chief U.S. investment strategist at CIBC World Markets.

"The overriding issue in the market is still the reality of higher energy prices and interest rates," Kumar added. "It looks like these things are holding the market back, even though earnings are good and the economy, both here and globally, seems OK."

The twin worries will keep the market nervous "until they are addressed," he added.
Double, double, oil and trouble

One result of surging oil prices: energy stocks were again the strongest sector in the S&P 500, just as they were in the first two quarters and in 2004. (For a look at the top sectors in the quarter, see the chart).

Whether that will continue is a matter of some debate on Wall Street.

"I think energy stocks will flatten or worse," said Hummer. "I'm not looking at the sector to tank, but I don't think it will hold the same appeal for money managers as it has in the previous three quarters."

Energy prices were already significantly higher before Katrina and Rita, and the storms mean oil prices will stay high, said Ben Halliburton, chief investment officer and founder of Tradition Capital Management. But the underlying stocks are approaching fair value after having run up for nearly two years, he said.

Even so, he thinks oil exploration and production stocks may still be worth a look. Some of the stocks are trading as if oil is $50 a barrel whereas "oil is at $65 right now," said Halliburton. "So even if oil prices were to fall back, that sub-sector would still be undervalued."

Oil and gas exploration and production stocks jumped nearly 30 percent in the quarter and are up 71 percent year-to-date.

Elsewhere coal stocks led the industry, jumping about 46 percent in the quarter, and are up 87 percent year-to-date. Oil and gas refiners and marketers held the second spot, with gains of 44 percent and 94 percent, respectively.

Clothing retailers and department stores, home furnishing firms and thrifts and mortgage companies were among the worst performers. (For a look at S&P 500 winners and losers, see the chart.)
Crystal ball gazing

Regardless of whether the stocks pull back, oil prices look to remain high, which will keep pressure on the broader market as investors worry about the impact of high energy costs on the economy -- and earnings.

"Consumers are going to be in for an ugly winter, heating their homes and fueling their cars," Halliburton said "As a result, consumer spending in other areas is going to change."

Non-essentials will feel the impact, with recreation and consumer electronics stocks likely to slump, said Michael Swanson, senior economist at Wells Fargo.

"If you have to reapportion money on energy, you're not going to take it out of money you spend on food, medicine or clothing," Swanson said. "The staples aren't effected, but the discretionary items are, and you're likely to see that reflected in the stock market."

Stocks that could do well in the quarter include those affected by the reconstruction of the Gulf Coast, said CIBC's Kumar.

Financials, which have had a tough time amid rising rates, could see a bit of a recovery in the fourth, Kumar added. Additionally, he said that people are underestimating select companies in info tech.

Health care, excluding the big drugmakers, are likely to benefit as investors look for defensive stocks, some analysts said.

As for the broader market, it may not suffer that much overall though trading could be volatile, Swanson said, noting pressure from oil and interest rates could spur sector rotation or some modest moves out of the market, rather than wholesale selling.

"The question is, if you have money to invest, do you want to put it into the bond market, which has inflation issues, or keep it in stocks," Swanson said. "Stocks will probably continue to hold up in the quarter because other asset classes are less attractive."

Additionally, November and December are traditionally up months for the stock market, with strong inflows into mutual funds, holiday retail sales, and other stimulative factors in play.

"Earnings growth for the S&P 500 continues to be robust, and could endup beating north of 10 percent for the year," Tradition Capital's Halliburton said, adding he thinks those will support stocks even if short-term rates keep rising.

"Looking into the fourth quarter, the market could move up a little from here," he added. Top of page



Find this article at:
http://money.cnn.com/2005/09/30/markets/3Qwrapup/index.htm
 
imported post

[size=+2]Iran says to hold back oil sales if sent to U.N.[/size]
By Yara Bayoumy
DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran, the world's fourth biggest oil producer, may hold back on oil sales if its nuclear programme is referred to the U.N. Security Council, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview published on Saturday.
Iran has failed to convince the United States and the European Union its nuclear programme is peaceful, prompting the U.N. nuclear watchdog to recommend Tehran be reported to the Security Council for possible sanctions.




2005-10-01T170428Z_01_NOOTR_RTRJONP_1_India-217923-3-pic0.jpg



Iran may respond by holding back on oil sales if its nuclear programme is referred to the United Nations Security Council, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview published on Saturday. Ahmadinejad attends a ceremony for the start of the new university year in Tehran September 27, 2005. (REUTERS/Raheb Homavandi)Diplomats expect a referral is likely in November.
"If Iran's case is sent to the Security Council, we will respond by many ways, for example by holding back on oil sales," Ahmadinejad told the United Arab Emirates' English-language daily, the Khaleej Times.
He did not specify what he meant. Oil accounts for about 80 percent of Iran's export earnings.
"We have been extremely cooperative, we have had more than 1,200 man days of inspections, monitoring cameras are everywhere in our facilities," the president added.
Analysts had predicted Iran could use its abundant oil resources as leverage against countries seeking to send it to the Security Council.
OPEC heavyweight Iran pumps around 4 million barrels per day.
It sees politics and its hydrocarbon resources as intimately linked. Nationalist leader Mohammad Mossadegh, who was ousted in a CIA-backed coup in 1953 after nationalising the British-run oilfields, is an enduring symbol of national pride.
Ahmadinejad's remarks are the latest in a series of warnings Iran has made against sending its case to New York.
On Thursday, it reiterated it would resume uranium enrichment and stop allowing U.N. snap inspections of its atomic facilities if it was referred.
Iran has restarted nuclear fuel related work but has so far stopped short of actually producing enriched uranium in underground facilities near the central town of Natanz.
Washington says this enriched uranium will be used in warheads but Tehran insists it is only needed for power stations.
Tehran has already threatened to use trade ties to punish countries that voted to report it to the Security Council, possibly endangering major deals with India and Japan.
The 35-nation governing board of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) meets next month to discuss Iran.
"So I urge the U.N. not to bend to U.S. pressure," Ahmadinejad said.
"We understand and we know that their (the Western powers') intentions are bad. All of our activities have been transparent to the IAEA and we've announced many times that because of our religious and cultural views (we) are against the creation and use of nuclear weapons."


http://tinyurl.com/9gkcl

here comes ole flat top......oil may end up being the straw with these guys.
 
imported post

Indian Government at a loss what to do

- Iran scraps Gas deal with India after India votes against Iran
Kiran Chaube
Sep. 29, 2005



http://goldismoney.info/forums/showthread.php?t=24405




India thought Iran will not retaliate. It voted against Iran in IAEA resolution to allow referral to UN Security Council. Iran has retaliated. It cancelled all gas sale to India.

Iran has scrapped a natural gas export deal with India after New Delhi voted in favor of a UN atomic agency resolution putting Tehran on notice over its nuclear program, a newspaper reported on Wednesday.

Under a deal signed in June, India planned to import 5 million tons of liquefied natural gas annually for 25 years with deliveries from Iran starting in 2009.

Iran's decision to cancel the deal was conveyed to India's permanent representative at the International Atomic Energy Agency by Iran's ambassador in Vienna, Austria.

It followed India's decision to join the US, Britain, France, Germany and other nations in backing a resolution calling on the agency to consider reporting Iran to the UN Security Council for not complying with the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
 
imported post

Birchtree wrote:
The I fund had a good September run, foreign speculators may be getting ready to take some profits for a few weeks - wouldn't hurt to step back a bit if you are a trader - long termers just ride through it and accumulate - IMHO.
Good call, Birchtree.
 
Back
Top