Market Talk

imported post

vectorman wrote:
Looks like a good day for panic selling. :s And perhaps a great day for reentering the market. :^ What will Monday bring??? :?
If we are in a strong bull market, we should have seen enough pullback and Friday's action will be enough. This coming week should be interesting in that we are due for a continued rebound unless the market is waiting for a real selloff which we really haven't seen yet.
 
imported post

I was thinking about putting a footin for Monday but was not able to, Work. I will be able to see theopenMonday and may do something then. I do not believe the oil will be a target in Iraq.:) Thats the good. They are to busy trying to ruin the election.:X That is the bad. What I suspect they, (terrorist)realy wantis to have overthrown Iraq and have another Iran with money. Even more extreme then Iran.:sIf things do not go horribly bad thenI suspect the market will do goodMonday. With the security going up I do not believe things can go to bad. It will not be pretty, but,there will be some kind of an election. Perhaps, not a good one. But, there will be one. Monday up, is my guess though I have no money in.
 
imported post

tsptalk wrote:
That's probably true since I capitulated :)
So that's two down and how many to go? heh heh...wimps.

As far as DWCP goes (S Fund), Friday's digesting was on low volume. I am not concerned. For the past 12 sessions, since the sell-off, ~479 seems to be the unmovable support level...the bulls ain't lettin' the bears have it. Perhaps the bears will just get tired and go home? :D The Magic 8-ball says "most likely". (it seems to say that a lot, hmmm, I hope it's not just giving me lip service! :X)

SPX (C Fund) seems to be holding it together...not. I dunno why you guys waste your time with it. I've always seen it just as volatile, if not more, than S and not as much to gain, a crummy risk/reward ratio. (Am I missing something?)

Still holding ~50/50 S/I.
 
imported post

Oh yeah, Iraq: There was no excitement about turning it over to the locals, probably since everyone figured it would be a big clusterf---.

There is much euphoria about the vote and it's all about feelin' good, right? So I think it may be a small boon for the Market.
 
imported post

Rolo wrote:
SPX (C Fund) seems to be holding it together...not. I dunno why you guys waste your time with it. I've always seen it just as volatile, if not more, than S and not as much to gain, a crummy risk/reward ratio. (Am I missing something?)


Very true over the last year and a half or so but the experts all say that small caps outperform big caps for about the first 2 years of a bull market and then it starts to rotate to big caps. Given what has happened this January many (including myself) are asking if this rotation has begun.

Dave
 
imported post

Roger that, Wheelie-O, but I think the HEEeeeeeEEEeeeeeRD is wrong.

Money is cheeeeEEEEEEEeeap cheap cheapand will be for a while, after many rate hikes.

Also note how rate hikes haven't affected borrowing rates all that much.

So my unqualified, professional-wanna-be opinion is:

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSss!!!!

I'll wait for CONFIRMATION of large-cap gains exceeding small-cap gains and will adjust then. Until then, it's just conjecture based on not-much and I'd rather go with a more sure thing, which is that my small-caps and your large-caps were out hanging clothes...my small-caps punched your large-caps right in the nose...for a much huge-er gain over the past 100 days (12.35% vs. 7.32%).
 
imported post

well mho is:

1) dollar will slide again in a big way next time.:X

2) this will help the C fund indirectly since foreigners cash will scoop up relatively inexpensive USequities (big caps mainly) for chump change;)

3) will help the I for obviously reasons.

4) one will need to be a bit more nimble trading this year with oil. deficits and geo-political turmoil taking aim at your ASSets.:shock:

tekno:^

 
imported post

IFi was a buy and hold type i would go 60% C and 40% I right now.

C is in a dumpster (buy low) and theI will hedge your dollar.

jmho

ps: hey do not get me wrong the S fund has rocked will prob. still produce some nice returns.....i have been very happy playing with it since she arrived on the TSP table.
 
imported post

teknobucks wrote:
2) this will help the C fund indirectly since foreigners cash will scoop up relatively inexpensive US assests (big caps mainly) for chump change;)


I never thought of that. Keep an eye on the well-known companies, yes?
 
imported post

Rolo wrote:
teknobucks wrote:
2) this will help the C fund indirectly since foreigners cash will scoop up relatively inexpensive US assests (big caps mainly) for chump change;)


I never thought of that. Keep an eye on the well-known companies, yes?
The international US companies should benefit most from the weak dollar..you know, the coca colas and mcdonalds. That's the C fund. You won't find many international companies in the S fund.
 
imported post

The Shia Will Inherit Iraq
This Election Will Change the World, But Not in the Way the US Wanted
By ROBERT FISK
The Independent

Baghdad.

Shias are about to inherit Iraq, but the election tomorrow that will bring them to power is creating deep fears among the Arab kings and dictators of the Middle East that their Sunni leadership is under threat.

America has insisted on these elections--which will produce a largely Shia parliament representing Iraq's largest religious community--because they are supposed to provide an exit strategy for embattled US forces, but they seem set to change the geopolitical map of the Arab world in ways the Americans could never have imagined. For George Bush and Tony Blair this is the law of unintended consequences writ large.

Amid curfews, frontier closures and country-wide travel restrictions, voting in Iraq will begin tomorrow under the threat of Osama bin Laden's ruling that the poll represents an "apostasy". Voting started among expatriate Iraqis yesterday in Britain, the US, Sweden, Syria and other countries, but the turnout was much smaller than expected.

The Americans have talked up the possibility of massive bloodshed tomorrow and US intelligence authorities have warned embassy staff in Baghdad that insurgents may have been "saving up" suicide bombers for mass attacks on polling stations.

But outside Iraq, Arab leaders are talking of a Shia "Crescent" that will run from Iran through Iraq to Lebanon via Syria, whose Alawite leadership forms a branch of Shia Islam. The underdogs of the Middle East, repressed under the Ottomans, the British and then the pro-Western dictators of the region, will be a new and potent political force.

While Shia political parties in Iraq have promised that they will not demand an Islamic republic--their speeches suggest that they have no desire to recreate the Iranian revolution in their country--their inevitable victory in an election that Iraq's Sunnis will largely boycott mean that this country will become the first Arab nation to be led by Shias.

On the surface, this may not be apparent; Iyad Allawi, the former CIA agent and current Shia "interim" Prime Minister, is widely tipped as the only viable choice for the next prime minister--but the kings and emirs of the Gulf are facing the prospect with trepidation.

In Bahrain, a Sunni monarchy rules over a Shia majority that staged a mini-insurrection in the 1990s. Saudi Arabia has long treated its Shia minority with suspicion and repression.

In the Arab world, they say that God favoured the Shia with oil. Shias live above the richest oil reserves in Saudi Arabia and upon some of the Kuwaiti oil fields. Apart from Mosul, Iraqi Shias live almost exclusively amid their own country's massive oil fields. Iran's oil wealth is controlled by the country's overwhelming Shia majority.

What does all this presage for the Sunni potentates of the Arabian peninsula? Iraq's new national assembly and the next interim government it selects will empower Shias throughout the region, inviting them to question why they too cannot be given a fair share of their country's decision-making.

The Americans originally feared that parliamentary elections in Iraq would create a Shia Islamic republic and made inevitable--and unnecessary--warnings to Iran not to interfere in Iraq. But now they are far more frightened that without elections the 60 per cent Shia community would join the Sunni insurgency.

Tomorrow's poll is thus, for the Americans, a means to an end, a way of claiming that--while Iraq may not have become the stable, liberal democracy they claimed they would create--it has started its journey on the way to Western-style freedom and that American forces can leave.

Few in Iraq believe that these elections will end the insurgency, let alone bring peace and stability. By holding the poll now--when the Shias, who are not fighting the Americans, are voting while the Sunnis, who are fighting the Americans, are not--the elections can only sharpen the divisions between the country's two largest communities.

While Washington had clearly not envisaged the results of its invasion in this way, its demand for "democracy" is now moving the tectonic plates of the Middle East in a new and uncertain direction. The Arab states outside the Shia "Crescent" fear Shia political power even more than they are frightened by genuine democracy.

No wonder, then, King Abdullah of Jordan is warning that this could destabilise the Gulf and pose a "challenge" to the United States. This may also account for the tolerant attitude of Jordan towards the insurgency, many of whose leaders freely cross the border with Iraq.

The American claim that they move secretly from Syria into Iraq appears largely false; the men who run the rebellion against US rule in Iraq are not likely to smuggle themselves across the Syrian-Iraqi desert when they can travel "legally" across the Jordanian border.

Tomorrow's election may be bloody. It may well produce a parliament so top-heavy with Shia candidates that the Americans will be tempted to "top up" the Sunni assembly members by choosing some of their own, who will inevitably be accused of collaboration. But it will establish Shia power in Iraq--and in the wider Arab world--for the first time since the great split between Sunnis and Shias that followed the death of the Prophet Muhammad.
 
imported post

u bears will love this!:

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2004/12/three_peaks_and.html
compare this pattern with present dow on a daily or weekly chart. i have monthly dow charts of each decade back to 1900 and can only find the pattern 3 times, 1929, 1972 and 1999 with drops of 89%,49% and 34%. our 3 peaks were constructed in the 1st 3 quarters of 2004.

you can find all historical dow charts here. http://www.djindexes.com/mdsidx/index.cfm?event=showAverages


and the fence sitters this one:






January 30, 2005

Turning Points
by Andre Gratian










imp.gif


pixel.gif



[align=center]A 3-dimensional approach to technical analysis
Cycles - Structure - Price projections
[/align]
"By the Law of Periodical Repetition, everything which has happened once must happen again, and again, and again -- and not capriciously, but at regular periods, and each thing in its own period, not another's, and each obeying its own law ... The same Nature which delights in periodical repetition in the sky is the Nature which orders the affairs of the earth. Let us not underrate the value of that hint." -- Mark Twain

A Review of the Past two Weeks

This was the comment made 2 weeks ago:

It is apparent that, after the initial sell off, there is a great deal of deceleration taking place, and this is always the precursor to a reversal. Deceleration occurs when there are several cycles affecting the stock market simultaneously and they start to make their lows one at a time. This process is likely to continue until near the end of the month before we have a technical condition which permits a new up trend to develop.

A low point was reached for all the averages on Monday 1/25, and in spite of an attempt at resuming the decline last Friday, prices held above former lows and rallied at the close. This is a sign that the recent lows may hold, but we still have to get through the next couple of trading days to be sure.

The breadth indicators are confirming this possibility. The McCellan oscillator (A/D) is showing some good positive divergence which has gotten more definite in the past few sessions. It has a down trend line running just below the "0" line currently, which will have to be penetrated at the same time as down trend lines are penetrated on the indexes to signal a legitimate reversal to the upside.

The NH/NL indicator has also held very well in this decline and is now attempting to resume its up trend.

Oil may be the defining factor. On Friday, it was down sharply and this undoubtedly had some effect on the market and prevented it from selling off more drastically. I believe that it may have ended its upward correction and may be ready to retrace, although there could be some more distribution in this area. Whether it will be able to break below 40 on its next down wave remains to be seen.

Gold, as suggested in the last newsletter, is taking a breather, but it's probably only a matter of time before it resumes its down trend.

Current Position of the Market.

SPX: Long Term Trend - The long term trend turned up in October 2002 in conjunction with the 12-year cycle. It is now reinforced by the 10-year cycle which turned up in the Fall of 2004. A top is likely in 2005.

SPX: Intermediate Trend - The intermediate up trend is still in progress, but a short-term correction is taking place which may last into mid-February before trying to push higher (see What's next).

SPX: The Short-term trend is far along in its correction and should be much closer to the bottom than the top.

Because of market volatility, the short term trend is better analyzed on a daily basis with the help of hourly charts. This is done in our daily market updates and Closing Comments.

Daily market analysis: If you would like to receive an explanation of how I arrive at buy and sell signals and be notified on the day that they occur, please let me know at ajg@cybertrails.com.

What's next?

Last week, indexes made a potential low for the short-term trend, and it is in the process of being tested. However, although I pay only partial attention to seasonal statistics, January is regarded as the strongest month of the year, and February as the weakest. Will their normal behavior reverse this year? Or does the weak -- instead of strong -- January portend an even weaker February? I believe that seasonality is, like everything else, geared to cyclic configurations, which are always shifting. Therefore, I pay more attention to cycles than to seasonal trends. Two weeks ago I wrote:

The next important cycle to be concerned about is the 20-week cycle which makes its low in 5 weeks, but, like all cycles, it is subservient to the influence of larger cycles, so it may only bring about a minor correction in prices. In any case, as always, there will be plenty of warning from A/D, NH/NL, and momentum indicators. First we'll concentrate on identifying the low of the current correction and then we can turn our attention to the next top.

The above remains our analytic priority. In pulling back to 1163, the SPX came down into its (Fib.) projected range of 1161/1170 and found support. But we must keep in mind that a normal 50% retracement could take the market all the way down to 1154, and if the 20-week cycle brings in a lot of weakness, then we could go down to the .618 retracement level of 1139. Remember, these are only potential targets, and it is up to the market to decide where it wants to go, something that many analysts tend to forget.

If we don't get a decent rally in the next few days, I may stop paying attention to the 9-month cycle. It has been very unreliable in the past couple of years, and since its low occurs regularly 10-12 weeks after the 40-week cycle, it may only be a harmonic of that cycle. Those who are familiar with acoustics know that primary vibrations also produce harmonics. This is well-know in the music field. But it probably applies to the stock market as well, since market cycles are probably caused by energy vibrations. There is also the possibility that certain "cycles" are formed by the combination of other cycles which happen to produce a secondary effect which happens to look like a legitimate cycle. Dewey addresses this phenomenon in his book Cycles, the Mysterious Forces that Create Events and cites examples of what appears to be a legitimate cycle lasting for years and then fading, sometimes returning at a later date and sometimes disappearing forever. So we'll have to see if the 9-month rhythm persists and returns to its former degree of vitality, or if it is no longer effective.

One should also keep in mind that cycles are not the only natural forces which affect the stock market. Or, more accurately stated, they come in different manifestations. "Conventional" cycles are measured from low-to-low, but Gann's time cycles, which often use the same time measurements as the conventional cycles, can be measured from low-to-low, low-to-high, high-to-high, or high-to-low. And you also have Fibonacci time ratios to contend with. The time definition for a market reversal is dependent on all of these factors which sometimes occur simultaneously, and sometimes not. For instance, the next 20-week cycle low will occur not only in conjunction with the low point of the next short-term trading cycle, but with converging Fib. Ratios. All these factors make the third week in February a particularly important date to watch.

A brief analysis of other markets:

Gold and the Dollar: The latest statistics on the shorting activity of the commercial traders (1/25) show that they are expecting some more consolidation in the price of gold before it falls further. It could also mean a decent rally, as the statistics show that the current level of shorting normally results in an up trend which can last several weeks. This would mean that the dollar is expected to expand its base and re-test its lows in the next few weeks. The longer the base, the bigger the move out of the base, and this is still expected to be base-building, not a resumption of the downtrend.

For the long term bears on the dollar, one thing to remember is that it is still the only currency which really qualifies as the world's reserve currency, and this will -- eventually -- place a floor under it, which could very well be now!

Oil: As mentioned above, the price of oil appears to be making a short term top, but could spend more time top-building with rallies to 50 or slightly above. If this happens, it could keep the markets at bay for a while longer, but if it decides to come down right away, it would have the opposite effect and help support a rally.

Charts

The charts provided this week are those of the SPX and of the NASDAQ 100. We will concentrate on looking at the short term down trend which started in early January within the context of the intermediate- term trend which started in 8/04, to see if there is any sign of a short-term reversal about to take place, and what must happen to confirm this.

First, on the daily charts, you will notice that the intermediate up channel is well-defined. It has already been broken on the NASDAQ 100, and the lower trend line is supporting prices for the SPX. If that line is broken, it's no big deal, since it would only mean that the trend is probably shifting to a more shallow slope. But it would extend the corrective move and prolong it.

The next thing to look at is the position of the indicators below the price chart. Note that they are trying to get back into an up trend, which means that the correction could be over, or nearly over. What is still lacking is some clearly defined positive divergence, and this means that we could see additional consolidation of prices before reversing the trend.

Turning to the hourly charts, notice that the down channels are well-defined. (Note: There was bad data on the NASDAQ 100 which I could not correct, so I used the QQQQ chart instead. Same pattern.)

On the SPX 2-hour chart, the channel is drawn using two different techniques; Andrews pitchfork (solid lines) and a conventional method (dashed lines) which connects tops and draws a parallel line across the lows.

You will notice that although the steeper channel lines are being challenged and ready to be penetrated, the top of the dashed channel is still quite a ways away and will have to be penetrated before we can confirm an end to the correction.

The QQQQ hourly chart tells the same story as the SPX 2-hour chart.

Turning to the hourly indicators, note that they are not yet in the configuration which would call for a solid low to be in place. Although the divergence with 1/25 is obvious, we probably need to do a little more work in the move which started down on Friday.

Note: The charts provided are courtesy of "My Trader", Fongan Technology at http://www.fongan.net/mt/.

This is a terrific software package that you can download and use for free in the delayed version. If you want real-time, it will cost you about $50.00 a month. This was brought to my attention by one of our readers and I am very grateful for it.

2530_a.gif


2530_b.gif


2530_c.gif


2530_d.gif


2530_e.gif


SUMMARY:

The correction which started from the1217 level in early January on the SPX may have run its course, but this will have to be confirmed by future market action. The period which extends from the present to the 3rd week in February is going to decide if we reverse right away, continue to build a base, or go lower.

There you have it! From here, the market can either go up, sideways or down! Terrific technical analysis! Unfortunately, there are times when markets go through a murky period, and this is one of them. Like fog which limits visibility, it's only a temporary condition, and you have to wait until it clears up!

P.S.
Beginning on January 1, 2005, upon request, readers not previously enrolled will be entitled to the daily market comments FREE for a 6-week trial period. After that time has expired, they can choose to subscribe on a yearly or quarterly basis. Full details are available on the website "SUBSCRIBE" section, including a choice of yearly or quarterly subscription terms.





Andre Gratian
MarketTurningPoints.com

The above comments about the financial markets are based purely on what I consider to be sound technical analysis principles uncompromised by fundamental considerations. They represent my own opinion and are not meant to be construed as trading or investment advice, but are offered as an analytical point of view which might be of interest to those who follow stock market cycles and technical analysis.

I encourage your questions and comments. Please contact me at: ajg@cybertrails.com
 
imported post

HIGH voter turnout in Iraq ~:D

Coupled with oversold conditions, look for MONSTER RALLY begining on Monday.:dude:

*******8if we do i'm selling downto 7 % in each stock fund balance G:^
 
imported post

U.S. Companies Back in Business in Libya

TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Libya awarded its first contracts to U.S. companies in 18 years Saturday, handing oil and gas exploration licenses to three American firms to draw a line under decades of international isolation.

The United States eased its trade embargo on oil-rich Libya last spring as a reward to Tripoli for giving up weapons of mass destruction.

The European Union swiftly followed suit, paving the way for a plethora companies with oil and gas interests to renegotiate business deals with the North African state.

Tripoli's ties with the West were helped by its agreement in 2003 to accept civil responsibility and make payouts for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing of a Pan Am airliner over Scotland which killed 270 people.

U.S. bid winners Occidental Petroleum Corp, Amerada Hess Corp and ChevronTexaco were among more than 120 companies who registered bids or expressed interests on the offers, Libyan officials said.

A total of 15 licenses were offered for onshore and offshore blocks in one of the world's exploration hotspots.

Australia's Woodside Petroleum Ltd, a Canadian consortium grouping Vernex and Medco, United Arab Emirates' Liwa company, Brazil's Petrobras and Algerian oil and gas giant Sonatrach also won blocks in the first round.

Shortly after naming the bid winners, Libyan state-run National Oil Company chairman Abdullah al-Badri said Tripoli would offer 40 blocks in a second licensing round next month.

Libya produces about 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd) and hopes to raise this to 2.1 million bpd by the end of this decade.

OIL RICH

Occidental Petroleum first entered Libya in 1966. The company's output reached 170,000 bpd before it left in 1986, and it operated on fields with reserves of 23 billion barrels, the company said.

Amerada is part of the Oasis Group, which includes Marathon Oil Corp. and ConocoPhillips.

Oasis production peaked in 1969 at over 1 million bpd and declined to 400,000 bpd in 1986 before expanded U.S. sanctions forced them to leave. Operation of the concessions was taken over by the Libyan state oil company and production eventually ebbed to a trickle.

A member of the OPEC oil producing cartel, Libya says it hopes to attract $30 billion of investments up to 2010, but some economic analysts say the figure could go much higher if political relations with the major powers keep improving.

During the 1970s and 1980s, foreign energy companies flocked to Libya, despite Muammar Gaddafi's hardline anti-Western stance, but in 1986 the United States imposed an embargo on dealings with the country which it accused of sponsoring terrorism.

In 1992, the United Nations imposed economic sanctions in the wake of the Lockerbie bombing, blamed on Libyan intelligence.

But the U.N. sanctions were removed after Gaddafi agreed to pay compensation to the families of the victims as well as to those of a similar French airline disaster in the 1980s for which Libya implicitly accepted responsibility.

The U.S. embargo was finally lifted after the Libyan leader also renounced weapons of mass destruction a year ago and began to move his country back into the global political mainstream.
 
imported post

Russia and Syria sign major weapons deal



World Net Daily | Jan 29 2005

U.S., Israel upset at Moscow's new alliance

Russia and Syria this week signed a major weapons agreement in addition to the energy and trade deal the two countries reportedly reached Wednesday, prompting American and Israeli officials to privately voice concern over Russia's assistance to countries accused of aiding the insurgency in Iraq.

Russian president Vladimir Putin and Syrian president Bashar Assad signed a military cooperation agreement that enables Russia to upgrade Syria's military and sell Damascus advanced arms.

Among the first weapons transferred is the sale of an advanced anti-aircraft missile system mounted on armored personnel carriers, according to sources.

The system is highly effective against low-flying aircraft and cruise missiles, and the mobility offered by the carriers renders the new missiles difficult to detect prior to launch. A deal in the works may also provide Syria with advanced surface missiles capable of engaging multiple targets at once.


Assad was in Russia this week to discuss ways of strengthening ties with the former Soviet Union and to request debt-forgiveness.
Putin pledged joint business ventures, including projects focusing on the development of oil and gas resources in Syria, and agreed to write-off 73 percent of Syria's $13.4 billion debt to Russia.

Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Fradkov, who participated in talks with Assad, said Moscow is ready to cooperate with Syria "in every direction," including facing "new challenges and threats" in the Middle East region.

But U.S. and Israeli officials have been urging Russia to limit the scope of its new military pact with Syria and have expressed concern the weapons could be passed to Hezbollah or to insurgents for use against U.S. forces in Iraq.

Insurgents have been spotted crossing the Syria-Iraq border, and the U.S. says it has substantial intelligence Syria has been providing fighters with funds, weapons and intelligence information. Several detained insurgents have confessed to receiving Syrian support.

Israeli officials have an added gripe. Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin reported last week Israel is upset its own technology may be incorporated in the systems for sale to Syria.

A source in Jerusalem said Prime Minister Ariel Sharon became alarmed as intelligence reports accumulated showing Russia not only is interested in selling hardware to the Syrians, but has been using as bait supposed secretive, growing technological and scientific ties with Israel.

One report reveals the Russians had offered similar proposals to the Iranians and in so doing were blatantly breaching one-by-one weapons agreements and understandings achieved with Israel over the past five years.

The new weapons deal with Syria underscores fears Russia has been aligning itself with regimes working to destabilize American interests in the Middle East, particularly Iran, which intelligence indicates is the primary state sponsor of the Iraq insurgency.

Russia has been the main provider to Iran of nuclear technology and facilities. Moscow claims its nuclear cooperation with Tehran is confined exclusively to civilian nuclear plant construction, such as a previous deal for the construction and supply of Iran's Beshehr reactor.

But sources say Russia has embarked on a government-sponsored nuclear and missile technology transfer program that could provide Iran with the ability to produce nuclear bombs in one to three years. They say Russia still is contemplating providing Tehran with rods that are able to enrich uranium, a deal that was first reported last September.

Earlier this month, Russia reportedly installed a mobile radar system to protect the Bushehr nuclear reactor, and similar systems allegedly are in the works for other Iranian nuclear facilities, with a site in central Iran being fitted for the system. The portable units are designed to detect low, medium and high altitude incoming missiles, and would complicate any attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Sources told WND operators of the Beshehr plant arrived earlier this month at a nuclear training center in Novovoronezh, Russia, where they have been receiving instruction on facility operation.

Iran has been directly connected to violence in Iraq. An agent of Iran's elite Jerusalem Force was arrested this week in Iraq's Diyala province carrying money and planning attacks against U.S.

The Iranian agent reportedly revealed during interrogation the location of a group of other Iranian agents working with them and admitted to having smuggled the group and their weapons through the Iran-Iraq border, avoiding security controls.

The arrest followed the confession last week of Col. Muayed Al-Nasseri, an insurgent leader and former head of Saddam Hussein's "Army of Muhammad," who told U.S. interrogators Iran was the principle financier of the insurgency in Iraq.

The U.S. has been attempting to formulate an appropriate policy to temper Russia's alliances with Iran and Syria. According to officials familiar with the talks, the U.S. has offered Russia different possible compensations in return for severing nuclear dealings with Iran including financial packages, agreeing to the Russian import of nuclear waste from Taiwan, South Korea or Japan, and even having NASA contract certain services from the Russians. But the offers were not effective.

One source said Bush is being pressured into warning Russia in a summit next month with Putin that relations with the U.S. are dependent on its cutting ties with Iran and Syria.

"Russia is trying to gain a foothold in the Middle East by lining itself up with Syria and Iraq," said the source. "This is part of a new global order being oriented after September 11 and with America staking out its position in the war on terror. U.S. policy on Russia needs to be updated to reflect this."
 
imported post

great articles!

with all this conflicting infomation I asked an expert for his thoughts. Is this a good week to get invested or not???



32-106-G1.gif








there you have it folks!!!! LOL
 
Back
Top