Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
Yes, corn is making america fat and it's wonderful that your grandmother lived to 97 (mine was 97 also), but after watching King Corn, you will realize that your grandma was not eating corn fed beef, and drinking high fruitose corn syrup in her sweet teas/soda. It's only been since the 1980's until today that our food in saturated with corn. And it's genectically modified corn that does not taste good until refined. The farmers who grow it do not eat it. Thats chilling.Yep I'm sure that corn is making me fat and I know for sure we are going to be paying $3 a gallon for fresh water.
You know My grand Mother lived to be 97 and ate all this stuff, I just don't understand I guess, I'll find out when my heart explodes, I suppose?:laugh:View attachment 3945
It's not the Bourbon you have to look out for, but the Cola, Sweet BBQ sauce and everlasting baked goods. And yes, it's made from feed corn, bleah.I'll research that, it's news to me. They better not mess with the Bourbon!!:nuts:
If you think there's not going to be a war over fresh water....
it takes more energy to produce ethanol than is saved by using it. Those fertilizer plants run on....fossil fuel! ERGO...they can't afford the fuel to produce the fertilizer to grow the corn to make the alternative fuel (to power the car that Jack built:laugh. ERGO...if they continue to produce it, the price of ethanol will be passed along...so where's the savings to the consumer? ZILCH.This weeks WSJ had a breakdown of AG price and the high cost of fertilizer.
it takes more energy to produce ethanol than is saved by using it.
Question...if ethanol is so much more economical...why don't they just power themselves with what they produce and quit using fossil fuels to power the fertilizer and ethanol plants?
LOL! James, see! I present both sides of the argument!Quote:
Old wives tale-- produced by a report done by an oil industry lobbiest. At current production rate, it only takes about 50% of the energy to make ethanol (including everything) as it produces. Don't believe everything you read. Study hard and you'll see there are other studies out there, including government studies that say ethanol is a net benefit for fuel.
Exactly. When you do the study using ethanol powered farm equipment, the numbers are even better.Originally Posted by luv2read
Question...if ethanol is so much more economical...why don't they just power themselves with what they produce and quit using fossil fuels to power the fertilizer and ethanol plants?
By the way- I am proud to say that I have now gone three weeks and 1200 miles purchasing only E85. I doubt I will ever purchase a full tank of straight gasoline again.
Breaking news: One ethanol plant in Missouri scrapped due to land option expiring. One on indefinite hold and two in IL on indefinite hold.
Or, ethanol producers will hook people like James and the run up the price the same as gasoline once they have a big enough customer base. They are in business too and once they get a big enough foot hold they will run the price up to maximize their profits. They will take a page out of big oils play book, their board members are no different than big oils. Meanwhile the price of everything that uses corn or corn sweetener will go up due to the increased demand on corn ethanol.
The oil companies that own the gas station will keep jacking with the price at the pump so that you don't save that much. Bragging rights about using ethanol won't mean jack.
Give me the black stuff!
Not rumors, but facts - and they're available through FOIA. The oil lobby and auto lobby are hand-in-fist with Congress on this one...anything to delay alternative energy and maximize profits from current fossil fuel technologies. It takes time and money to retool, after all....and if you can get the government to go along with you, why bother? If Congress had only stuck to their guns 30 years ago - but no. As soon as the embargo was lifted, it was business as usual. Sigh.:nuts:In the past it had been rumored that car manufacturing companies were in with the oil companies to not aggresive in doing research on vehicles with alternative form of energy. Now big SUV producing companies like Ford can't give their vehicles away.