coolhand's Account Talk

I believe I heard the guy just above say that Congressmen and Senators get their full salaries as retirement after serving one term. I've heard that before, too, yet know it's not correct. I wonder if the people repeating it believe it or just use the idea to inflame.

The guy is out to lunch on that point but he makes other good ones. Here is the scoop on congressional retirement:

"Prior to 1984, neither federal civil service workers nor Members of Congress
paid taxes to Social Security, nor were they eligible for Social Security benefits.
Members of Congress and other federal employees were instead covered by a
separate pension plan called the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS). The 1983
amendments to the Social Security Act (P.L. 98-21) required federal employees first
hired after 1983 to participate in Social Security. These amendments also required
all Members of Congress to participate in Social Security as of January 1, 1984,
regardless of when they first entered Congress. Because the CSRS was not designed
to coordinate with Social Security, Congress directed the development of a new
retirement plan for federal workers. The result was the Federal Employees’
Retirement System Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-335).
Members of Congress first elected in 1984 or later are covered automatically
under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS), unless they decline this
coverage. Those who already were in Congress when Social Security coverage went
into effect could either remain in CSRS or change their coverage to FERS. Members
are now covered under one of four different retirement arrangements:
!
Full coverage under both CSRS and Social Security;

!
The “CSRS Offset” plan, which includes both CSRS and Social
Security, but with CSRS contributions and benefits reduced by
Social Security contributions and benefits;

!
FERS plus Social Security; or

!
Social Security alone.
Congressional pensions, like those of other federal employees, are financed
through a combination of employee and employer contributions. All Members pay
Social Security payroll taxes equal to 6.2% of the Social Security taxable wage base
($97,500 in 2007). Members covered by FERS also pay 1.3% of full salary to the
Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. Members covered by CSRS Offset
pay 1.8% of the first $97,500 of salary, and 8.0% of salary above this amount, into

the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund."

http://www.senate.gov/reference/resources/pdf/RL30631.pdf
 
I was surprised by the degree of weakness we saw on OPEX last Friday (the day I bailed to G) and then the degree of strength today.

I guess today's strength continues to lend credence to the IT Seven Sentinels signal, huh? :rolleyes:

Still, we'll be seeing some weakness again; probably by midweek.

While I didn't get to partake in today's gains in my TSP account, I was holding FAS in my Scottrade account. Flexibility is a wonderful thing. :D
 
The SS signal is the only reason I went in 25% two weeks ago then a total of 50% last week. I know the main reason for what we saw today was home sales news and the feds announcement so I'm wondering how we would have faired if that news hadn't come out. Staying with the SS signal for now and staying 50% in.
 
Never heard of Charles Nenner before reading on the MB. Do you guys give any vindication to his latest predictions based on what is occurring or is it all announcement driven? His interviews are hard for me to interpret but I believe he predicted a bottom in mid March followed by a rally into April/May.
 
While I didn't get to partake in today's gains in my TSP account, I was holding FAS in my Scottrade account. Flexibility is a wonderful thing. :D
Congratulations on the FAS! :cool: I sold mine last week, made an 8% profit and thought I did well. Woulda, shoulda, coulda. :rolleyes: :cheesy:

Lady
 
Never heard of Charles Nenner before reading on the MB. Do you guys give any vindication to his latest predictions based on what is occurring or is it all announcement driven? His interviews are hard for me to interpret but I believe he predicted a bottom in mid March followed by a rally into April/May.

I know who he is, but I don't follow many gurus. Too many of em' and they're all right and wrong at one time or another. I try to stick with sentiment and TA.
 
The SS signal is the only reason I went in 25% two weeks ago then a total of 50% last week. I know the main reason for what we saw today was home sales news and the feds announcement so I'm wondering how we would have faired if that news hadn't come out. Staying with the SS signal for now and staying 50% in.

Congrats on taking advantage of the signal. I had reservations about getting out last week, but there will be many more opportunities. :)

Still in buy territory too. ;)
 
Congratulations on the FAS! :cool: I sold mine last week, made an 8% profit and thought I did well. Woulda, shoulda, coulda. :rolleyes: :cheesy:

Lady

They made me work for it, as always. :rolleyes:

Bought and sold too soon on both counts, but hey, a gain is a gain.
 
Latest read of the Seven Sentinels:

Seven Sentinels suggest a middle ground between "buy shallow pullbacks" and "immediate move to new lows". SS's are still on a buy signal, and will take some time to roll over, given the strength of the initial thrust, and strength of uptrend in progress. Thus my take is that we will have a sharp pullback here, followed by more tests to new highs, before they finally produce a sell signal and an "all-clear" for a slide into new low ground. JMHO, based on my observations of SS's over time....D
 
Good video, unfortunately it'll just fall on deaf ears. Will we learn from our past mistakes...no, we still elect the same pols that got us into this mess.

The chart showing that the loans that Fannie and Freddie have given to those that can't afford them, failing sooner and sooner was very telling and we're doing the samer thing again. I'm afraid nothing short of a depression will cure what ails us. When you have Krugman and Gingrich both saying the latest Geithner plan will fail, that sure doesn't sound promising.

Edit:

Interesting followup link on the latest plan and it's workings. It looks like the asset managers will make all the money. Just a giant pyramid scheme, with the general public being on the top?

http://www.businessweek.com/investo...chan=top+news_top+news+index+-+temp_top+story

Thanks for sharing, :)
CB
 
Last edited:
Latest read of the Seven Sentinels:

Seven Sentinels suggest a middle ground between "buy shallow pullbacks" and "immediate move to new lows". SS's are still on a buy signal, and will take some time to roll over, given the strength of the initial thrust, and strength of uptrend in progress. Thus my take is that we will have a sharp pullback here, followed by more tests to new highs, before they finally produce a sell signal and an "all-clear" for a slide into new low ground. JMHO, based on my observations of SS's over time....D

Thanks Cool,

I enjoy your analysis of the SS's and look forward to them. Now I just gotta get in after the next pullback. I do hate chasing a rally :D

CB
 
Amazing...simply amazing. :(

I wish there was some good news to post, but alas I cannot find any. :blink:

If it wasn't for trying to grow my retirement, I would probably pretty much tune out all news on the internet. I haven't watched any TV news shows in almost 5 years now, though I do catch Bloomberg and CNBC for the financial news.

CB
 
Back
Top