Carnac's Corner

Techy,

Let's remember to walk our talk - save some of that vituperative ammunition for me - only the lonely know the way I feel today. Snort.
 
M_M
07/19-07/21
Posts: 133, 135, 138, 140, 141.
This is an open forum, but somewhere (?) there is a line.
Spaf
 
Spaf said:
M_M
07/19-07/21
Posts: 133, 135, 138, 140, 141.
This is an open forum, but somewhere (?) there is a line.
Spaf

You tell me, better yet tell everyone, what was said in those posts that was so bad?

I didn't call techy a queer did I?

Thank you for your attention.
 
Spaf said:
M_M
07/19-07/21
Posts: 133, 135, 138, 140, 141.
This is an open forum, but somewhere (?) there is a line.
Spaf

Spaf,

You are losing your objectivity. I find everyone of those posts wholly appropriate given Tech's propensity for lying about his track record. And yet you fail to mention Tech's completely inappropriate language.

Dave
<><
 
Spaf said:
M_M
07/19-07/21
Posts: 133, 135, 138, 140, 141.
This is an open forum, but somewhere (?) there is a line.
Spaf

Here are some posts you may have missed:

44
57
58
59
68
71
74
76
80
90
91
92
94
95
103
105
110
114
 
I was forced to turn off my ignore button to see what the fuss was about.

I guess I have to ask, Tom do you have Techy's moves that he has PM'd to you and do you have a date stamp on the moves? (I'm not in a hurry for the numbers cause I'm sure you are busy with the recent vacation.)

My observation echo's what Wheels said in terms of the "conversation" between these two.

If you set up your own thread and tout your crystal ball abilities, you need to be able to back it up.
 
Wheels said:
Spaf,

You are losing your objectivity. I find everyone of those posts wholly appropriate given Tech's propensity for lying about his track record. And yet you fail to mention Tech's completely inappropriate language.

Dave
<><

Na...The objective is the order on the board. I'm not taking sides.
M_M recent post was causing irritation. Appropriate? I don't care! Lying? I'm not the judge.
Tech's language! Yea, and probable get worse if they don't seperate.

You can't take the baby and cut it in half!

It's either stop it or lock it.
 
Spaf said:
Na...The objective is the order on the board. I'm not taking sides.
M_M recent post was causing irritation. Appropriate? I don't care! Lying? I'm not the judge.
Tech's language! Yea, and probable get worse if they don't seperate.

You can't take the baby and cut it in half!

It's either stop it or lock it.

Yeap couldn't agree more....glad you saw it....and I don't lie....thanks for those who believe.....
 
Wheels said:
Spaf,

You are losing your objectivity. I find everyone of those posts wholly appropriate given Tech's propensity for lying about his track record. And yet you fail to mention Tech's completely inappropriate language.

Dave
<><

wonder how many stories you told your friends when you was a kid....Nnutt was keeping a backup copy of my trades (I did that to ensure I had a backup-u never know what can happen and it did....), the same that I posted to Tom....they will be posted for those who accuse me a liar......such nice manners...
 
Re: Carnac's Crystal Ball Séance???

Alright everyone settle around the table and lets see what the Crystal Ball has in store for us....

Degredation of the markets to continue....looking for the eom 1st week of Aug to check the 1224 -1200 range in the S&P.....other funds degrade as well...as mentioned earlier in the last month or so.....

F fund is climbing but looks to be taken a rest....for the time being....it should climb as it did in 2000 while the CSI funds degrade.....
 
The_Technician said:
Crystal Ball sezzzz.....be looking for 1200 or below on the S&P, 510 to 520 on the Wilshire, and mid 50's on the EAFE........more than likely within the end of the month....

Batter up!!!

this was the post on 7/05/2006 mentioning what I thought the ball was saying....
 
The_Technician said:
this was the post on 7/05/2006 mentioning what I thought the ball was saying....

This format of fund status by the Crystal Ball could be a good possibility.....

7/24/06

Longer Term- F C S I caution to the downside thru Aug 8th...

Shorter Term- F C S I C,S funds looks like they could make a short term move and today may be the day to get in....I will look again before deadline.....;)
 
7/24/06

Longer Term- F C S I caution to the downside thru Aug 8th...

Shorter Term- F C S I C,S funds looks like they are making a short term move today, Friday was the day to move in (missed it-I'm too busy around the house of late), tomorrow may be another opportunity to get in....
 
The_Technician said:
7/24/06

Longer Term- F C S I caution to the downside thru Aug 8th...

Shorter Term- F C S I C,S funds looks like they are making a short term move today, Friday was the day to move in (missed it-I'm too busy around the house of late), tomorrow may be another opportunity to get in....
Tomorrow could be a dull day or a bit of a loss....
 
Initial Morning Review 7/25/06

Longer Term- F C S I caution to the downside thru Aug 8th...

Shorter Term- F C S I
C,S funds looks like they could make a short term move down.

Carnac's_Crystal Ball_ _______Current Status_____F____C____S____I
_______________________________Invested________?_____?_____?____?
_____________________________Not Invested_______?_____?_____?____?

Note: O=Get Out I=Get In
[/quote]
 
Last edited:
Edited/Changed Format......

Carnac’s Crystal Ball - Initial Morning Review7/25/06

Longer Term -
Caution to the downside thru Aug 8th...

Shorter Term F, C, S, I funds looks like they could make a short term
move down.

Carnac's_Crystal Ball_ __Current Reading____
_F____C____S____I

“As in Life, there are no guarantees in what the ball reads …”
Note:
Get/Stay Out Get/Stay In
 
Last edited:
Morning Tech!

RE: Investment advice

I know it's a damned if you do, damned if you dont situation, but I don't think we should tell folks to get in / get out.

Regarding Investment "Advice"

Reason being:

[TSP Talk provides a forum for investment and trading discussion, as well as samples of investment research. TSP Talk.com and TSP Talk does not warrant any of the information posted here, nor does such constitute investment advice by our posters or us. We do not endorse any service that advertises on the site, nor any poster who discusses his trades on the site.

Let us repeat: We are NOT your investment advisor. Do NOT take any action based upon what you read at this site without seeking independent confirmation as well as competent professional advice.

In other words, your decisions are your own. If you don't have a signed contractual agreement with US, then what you read here is NOT investment advice to you, no matter what you think it looks like.]

I think this disclaimer is appropriate at this point. We like your posts, but want to make sure that readers understand that the posts are your opinion as a member and do not constitute certified professional financial information.

PS: Not that it makes a hill of beans, cause I gave up on those "P's" a long time ago!..........:D ............Cheers!
 
Back
Top