Birchtree
Well-known member
imported post
Here is another example of my contrarian approach. Back in 1999 and into 2000 when everyone it seems was riding the Nasdaq Composite Index up from 2000 level to the 5048.62 level, this fool missed the whole tech-stock bubble. The reason was that I refused to succumb to the hype - and I refused to get involved. Do you know how difficult it was to maintain that posture - and to be all alone while doing it. I wasn't making much money. Well I made some but not enough that I'd want to tell anyone about. I stayed with the boring sp500 type stocks and some small value type stocks. If I had invested $10,000 in a technology mutual in 1997 it would have been worth close to $50,000 at the peak. $10,000 in an sp500 fund would have provided close to $15,000. The rest is history - I had a broker offer to help me make some money in tech - I told him no thanks, but to remember that every dog has his day and mine was coming. These cycles just last a long time somtimes - searching for the extremes. That time frame should be year end 1997. So you see it's not easy being a contrarian - going against the best and brightest on the Street. And I have other examples to demonstrate my approach - but no grand standing - I am who I am and I spend my money where I see opportunity. It's hard to find someone to help pay taxes at the end of the year. I think this cycle will show the C fund to be the outperformer. Yes it will probably take a few years - but I have capital and I have time. I now even have a Frog that I can monitor and hopefully use as my own contrary indicator. And I have a back up that I can also use as a contrary indicator, how can I possibly lose in this sweet situation?
Dennis
Here is another example of my contrarian approach. Back in 1999 and into 2000 when everyone it seems was riding the Nasdaq Composite Index up from 2000 level to the 5048.62 level, this fool missed the whole tech-stock bubble. The reason was that I refused to succumb to the hype - and I refused to get involved. Do you know how difficult it was to maintain that posture - and to be all alone while doing it. I wasn't making much money. Well I made some but not enough that I'd want to tell anyone about. I stayed with the boring sp500 type stocks and some small value type stocks. If I had invested $10,000 in a technology mutual in 1997 it would have been worth close to $50,000 at the peak. $10,000 in an sp500 fund would have provided close to $15,000. The rest is history - I had a broker offer to help me make some money in tech - I told him no thanks, but to remember that every dog has his day and mine was coming. These cycles just last a long time somtimes - searching for the extremes. That time frame should be year end 1997. So you see it's not easy being a contrarian - going against the best and brightest on the Street. And I have other examples to demonstrate my approach - but no grand standing - I am who I am and I spend my money where I see opportunity. It's hard to find someone to help pay taxes at the end of the year. I think this cycle will show the C fund to be the outperformer. Yes it will probably take a few years - but I have capital and I have time. I now even have a Frog that I can monitor and hopefully use as my own contrary indicator. And I have a back up that I can also use as a contrary indicator, how can I possibly lose in this sweet situation?
Dennis