No doubt, Ive seen it often - KSA factors, throw that stuff out the window.. gotta hire your brother-in-arms.
Yeah, there is probably some of that going on. KSA factors are often over rated especially in the technical craftsman world. They are usually written by people who have no clue what the job involves.
The fact you feel that way leads me to believe you have never had the privilege of military service.
There are people in the military that spend their whole career looking good, getting awards and organizing social events. The others who are the majority learn one important thing. It's called the J.O.B. If you develop a work ethic, day to day operations will continue to function and you might actually get recognized for that. Probably not, because you didn't look good, get a lot of awards, work at some headquarters and organize social events. This ethic about actually doing the job you were hired for is what many former military people bring with them. They may not fit in to the civil service environment at first as they have little patience with the people who drop around to BS for 15 or 20 minutes or the many e-mails they receive about social or quasi work related events. Some evolve to fit in to the ethic of not doing what they were hired for, some do not. Those that feel they should do what they were hired for are usually classified as a$$holes by their peers who have been around for a while. Those that adapt to “the system” become non productive.
If you are applying for a contract specialist, environmental specialist, engineer, office automation (or whatever a 318 is called these days) and many other positions, yeah it may be pretty cut and dried what the KSA and certifications have to be. That may also apply to IT types, though government network systems are not exactly what they teach at Cisco or Novell school.
Three examples of how flawed the KSA thing is:
- I applied for two identical jobs and sent the same resume and test answers. One agency said I was not qualified, one asked me to come for an interview and hired me.
- A few years ago resumes were sent to a peer review board to be evaluated by the people actually doing the job of the position advertised. I had the privilege of being a member of one board. Some of the resumes were easily culled, eg. "yes I can fix anything and for the last 10 years have been an au pair." That person's test answers stated they were an expert in all areas. Another resume that was thrown on the reject pile because of KSA I asked to look at again. The individual had adapted to working on a lot of different things over the years and could figure things out. The individual was later hired and became one of the best techs we ever had. He answered the KSA questions honestly and almost wasn't considered. And yes he was a veteran. A jar head. Served in a place named A Shau a long time ago. Did his job in spite of some minor distractions. Became a civilian and used the "get it done" ethic to his advantage.
- Now the questionnaire is culled at headquarters by HR types. I recently applied for a foreman job at my agency. I answered the questions honestly. My application was nor forwarded to my agency. I talked to a HR person at HQ and was told my leadership skills were good but my technical skills did not qualify. I have held this job for 12 years. Get good annual reviews. Now HR says I am not qualified to hold the job I hold. Maybe I should become active in the employees association and the EEO council.
So you are right, “KSA factors, throw that stuff out the window.” Unless you lie about it. And make sure you can be an activist over the incidental detail of doing the job you were hired to do.
Birchtree, I am high jacking your thread for this but it pushed a button.
Good luck with the cat cover and hope your scratch wounds heal up OK. Cats only draw blood because they love you.:toung: