Birchtree's Account Talk

Birchy you should be doing swell. With the month 2/3 over my C-fund is leading the pack. If the present pattern holds, on Mar 1st I will be selling shares of G- and C-funds, buying shares of S- and I-funds, maybe 50 each.

Dave
 
The wall flower sends best regards

DaveM,

My first thought was why sell a winner - then I remembered you balance. That is one disadvantage of regular balancing - it's all in the sacrifice. But a system is a system - and you will be proven over time to be straight on correct. The wall flower is finally showing spunk and perky attributes. I just purchased some C fund courtesy of dollar cost averaging and the price was unfortunately on the higher side. That means of course all the other dollar cost purchases were (at least for now) on the lower side of pricing. This is a great country. Take care.

Dennis
 
No top in sight

The Dow Jones Industrials joined the Dow Transports in posting new 52 week highs, as a positive signal in terms of Dow Theory. Primary trend confirmation at Dow 11,722.98 may be in play. Will we then get back to back secular bull markets - never happened in history before. I'm patiently waiting - waited on Japan for 5 years.

From a TA:
Since breadth of market (ormoney flow) leads price as to its ultimate direction, this kind of information has continued to do an exceptional job in its forecasting abilities for the market overall since the 2002 lows. So, if history is any indication, and with the strength we continue to see at this juncture with A/D lines themselves, this would then strongly suggest that we have much further to go on the upside before all is said and done - for we can't even think a termination point, as far as price is concerned, until these same A/D lines show a lessening of money flow, while price itself is making higher highs.

Bottom line then is that it's better to stay the course until the course changes unless, of course, one considers technical analysis as voodoo (which many do....thankfully) and use fundamental supposition as their foundational basis of market direction. The NYSE cumulative A/D line is a cumulative total of money moving in or out of the NYSE at a given point in time on a trend basis and will probably be testing new highs this week. We'll watch and see.
 
I sell the winners each month to spread it around. Last month I bought 50 shares of C-fund because it was lagging, now I am reaping the benefit. For the quarter so far I am running about 3.5% which is pretty close to the C-fund return for the year. The wall flower is happy.

Dave
 
Undeniable disbelief in the rally

Not everything is perfect howerver, the NYSE breadth MCSUM has taken the form of a ledge pattern, so we'll need to see some more upside acceleration fairly quickly for this ledge structure to be null and void. Many index volume MCOs continue to support many bottoms above bottoms and until this line of positive influence is violated, the path of least resistance is higher and pull backs should be used to accumulate positions based on individual merit of the pattern.

Last week's market maker call-put premium ratio for closing BTO (buy to open) positions was the lowest since early March 2003. This weekly indicator can be volatile, but historically, when the indicator reaches levels as currently observed, price bottoms are typically forming. Wth the strengthing of many index internals, particularly the RUT components and large caps, many important sentiment indicators (disbelief is widespread) are supporting the notion of further price strength going forward. We may see a noticeable upside pop in prices over the next few weeks. Something similar to a rip snorter - like off the 2002 July bottom. Two back to back 400 point gainers - that would be impressive. Very few are prepared and the bull likes it that way - no baggage please.
 
Mikelong,

If I post information from the Wall Street Journal it will not be edited - they write a lot better than I do. Hope you have found some of the information helpful.

Dennis
 
Even more undeniable disbelief in the rally

Money knows what money likes and money likes to make more money.

With the recent DJIA high of 11137.17, there are many indexes that have broken out to new all-time, or recovery highs.

NYSE common A/D line (U.S. and foreign issues): all-time high
NYSE U.S. only operating companies (OCO) A/D line: all-time high
Unweighted NYA: all-time high
NYSE common only UD line: all-time high
NYSE common only $ weighted UD line: all-time high
Unweighted MID index: all-time high
Unweighted Russell 1000 index: new recovery high
Unweighted DJIA: all-time high
Unweighted SPX: new recovery high
Unweighted RUT: all-time high
DJ STOXX 50: new recovery high
S&P small cap 600: all-time high
NYSE financial index: all-time high
Russell 2000: all-time high
Valuline index: all-time high

I'm sure I may have missed some of the foreign indexes - but I'm not chasing the I fund - only collecting the gains. My question is what will be the fuse for the upcoming rally? I hope the Military will stand aside and let Sadr's Mahdi Army militia stand up and defend their shrines against the Sunni Jihads. If civil war starts - well so be it - end the violence one way or the other. Hooah!
 
Yield Curve Inversions

From Merrill:

Looking back to 1953, we examined all the instances of Treasury yield-curve inversions. We found that an inversion between the three-month T-bill and the 10 year note signaled a market correction with a six to 18 month lag four out of the six times that an inversion occurred. Moreover, the average correction was 10% and bottomed 16 to 18 months after the inversion occurred. The various other yield-curve inversions that we studied did not give any indication of future equity market weakness. The current spread between the three-month T-bill and the 10 year T-note remains positive. Care to challenge Mr Wizard?
 
Financial stocks lead the S&P Herd

From TWSJ:

As a group, financial stocks - not energy stocks - dominate the S&P 500 stock index. A look at the total stock-market values of sectors in the S&P 500 over the years, shows the financial services industry went from being a relative bit player to a dominant force. Banks, stock brokers, insurance companies and the like make up 21% of the index's market value. The I fund financials are at 24.8%. Technology is next in the S&P 500 at 15%, followed by drug and other health-related stocks at 13%. Industrials are at 11%. Energy stocks, for all their gains, come in sixth, with 9%. I skipped consumer discretionary at 10% just because. And that is good news for the stock market, because financial stocks have longer coattails.

When oil stocks are dominant, as they were in the 1970s, it is because oil prices are so high that other parts of the economy suffer. When financials are strong, it is because inflation and interest rates are low. That is great news for banks and insurance companies because it holds down their cost of obtaining funds. And low interest rates hold down costs and boost profits at most other companies, too. That is why investors love to see financiala lead the market.

The question is whether financials are going to stay strong and keep leading stocks higher. Every decade, it seems, a different group of stocks takes command. The 1970s were a miserable period for most stocks, with oil prices soaring, oil stocks dominated the market. Back then, energy companies represented more than 20% of the S&P 500.

In the 1980s, as big consumer companies expanded world-wide, consumer stocks led. In the 1990s, it was technology. Now, although oil stocks are moving up again - in the 1990s, they were just 5% of the S&P - oil companies are nowhere near as important to the economy as they used to be. Service companies, particularly financial services, play a much biugger role. Which stock group dominates in the future will tell a lot about the market's direction.
 
No wonder your feet require socks

Robo,

Just caught up to your e-mails - thanks for sharing the data. It's this type of data that would make the Wizard melt in his chair. Now, if Bob ends up like Henry - I'll be forced to put on socks, too. Marty Zweig - an all time perennial bear is deep in energy. I'll be on Kudlow at 1700 hours today - he actually likes my bullish sentiment.

Henry talked about rampant bullish sentiment - so why do I feel completely alone in my manure pile? Nobody loves the C fund the way I do. She still continues to be good to me - I'm just waiting for the real good to me. Take care and I know you are having fun - that's important at your age.
 
Now your quoting PMs?

What next your imaginary friend that helped you in the last bear market? :rolleyes:

What his name? Gump. :D

Stay long, Forrest, stay long.
 
Contrary to the consensus

From Merrill with a new employee and different perspective:

Recent data indicate that the economy has been accelerating during the current quarter after sputtering late last year. A number of factors - the cooler housing market, the drag from high energy prices - suggest that the consumers are likely to trim their spending in the coming months and that the economy won't gallop ahead indefinitely. None the less, GDP growth isn't about to stop on a dime. One bright spot is the capital spending side of the economy, which accounts for about 11% of total GDP. It could provide a stronger-than-expected growth push in the quarters ahead. Signs pointing in that direction include an upturn in unfilled orders for capital goods, an increase in commercial and industrial loans, higher than average levels of cash on corporate balance sheets, and rising capacity utilization rates in many industries.

Another point to consider is that pricing has been improving in a number of sectors. Even though broad measures of inflation have been well-behaved, corporate sales have been growing at double-digit rates for nine consecutive quarters. That is a plus on several scores: it demonstrates that underlying demand trends have been on the strong side, which ought to encourage companies to increase their capital spending; and it provides a strong hint that the outlook for corporate profits is good. The current consensus is that S&P operating earnings will increase by about 11% this year, down from 13% last year but well-above the long-term average of roughly 7%. If corporate sales continue to rise at double-digit rates, the consensus earnings forecast could prove to be low.

Contrary to the consensus, we think that the Federal Reserve will end its tightening campaign soon. We expect the FOMC to push the funds rate to 4.75% at the March 27-28 meeting. That's likely to be the peak. Policymakers will begin to ease during the second half of 2006, in our opinion, and the funds rate will be down to 4.25% by the end of the year. The easing is likely to continue into the first quarter of 2007, with the funds rate reaching 3.75% and stayinf there throughout the year.

The inflation numbers were the brightest note in the recent economic data. Core PCE prices increased by only 0.16% pushing the yearly rate down to 1.8% from 1.9%. Fed Chairman Bernanke said recently that his greatest concerns for the economy are higher inflation (which would mean higher interest rates) and a downturn in the housing market (which would mean lower rates). He seems to be getting considerably more of the latter than the former. In spite of the Fed's worry that the low unemployment rate will fuel higher inflation, just the opposite continues to unfold. We expect a re-play, more or less, of the soft landing of 1995-96.

A final point: an inverted yield curve tells little, if anything, about the direction of the stock market. The correlation between the yield curve and the direction of the stock market is basically zero.

The oceanic account went back above the $1M this week - hope I can hold the positions and add some gains this week - I'm frankly starting to get excited with all the bear paws around. The old story is that bull markets do not like company, the market will do everything it can to make the majority gun shy and keep the bears from recognizing the prevailing trend. Just look at the head fake we had before the close on Friday - frustrating but some times necessary.

Dennis - the bullmeister.
 
Birchtree said:
From Merrill with a new employee and different perspective:

Recent data indicate that the economy has been accelerating during the current quarter after sputtering late last year. A number of factors - the cooler housing market, the drag from high energy prices - suggest that the consumers are likely to trim their spending in the coming months and that the economy won't gallop ahead indefinitely. None the less, GDP growth isn't about to stop on a dime. One bright spot is the capital spending side of the economy, which accounts for about 11% of total GDP. It could provide a stronger-than-expected growth push in the quarters ahead. Signs pointing in that direction include an upturn in unfilled orders for capital goods, an increase in commercial and industrial loans, higher than average levels of cash on corporate balance sheets, and rising capacity utilization rates in many industries.

Another point to consider is that pricing has been improving in a number of sectors. Even though broad measures of inflation have been well-behaved, corporate sales have been growing at double-digit rates for nine consecutive quarters. That is a plus on several scores: it demonstrates that underlying demand trends have been on the strong side, which ought to encourage companies to increase their capital spending; and it provides a strong hint that the outlook for corporate profits is good. The current consensus is that S&P operating earnings will increase by about 11% this year, down from 13% last year but well-above the long-term average of roughly 7%. If corporate sales continue to rise at double-digit rates, the consensus earnings forecast could prove to be low.

Contrary to the consensus, we think that the Federal Reserve will end its tightening campaign soon. We expect the FOMC to push the funds rate to 4.75% at the March 27-28 meeting. That's likely to be the peak. Policymakers will begin to ease during the second half of 2006, in our opinion, and the funds rate will be down to 4.25% by the end of the year. The easing is likely to continue into the first quarter of 2007, with the funds rate reaching 3.75% and stayinf there throughout the year.

The inflation numbers were the brightest note in the recent economic data. Core PCE prices increased by only 0.16% pushing the yearly rate down to 1.8% from 1.9%. Fed Chairman Bernanke said recently that his greatest concerns for the economy are higher inflation (which would mean higher interest rates) and a downturn in the housing market (which would mean lower rates). He seems to be getting considerably more of the latter than the former. In spite of the Fed's worry that the low unemployment rate will fuel higher inflation, just the opposite continues to unfold. We expect a re-play, more or less, of the soft landing of 1995-96.

A final point: an inverted yield curve tells little, if anything, about the direction of the stock market. The correlation between the yield curve and the direction of the stock market is basically zero.
The oceanic account went back above the $1M this week - hope I can hold the positions and add some gains this week - I'm frankly starting to get excited with all the bear paws around. The old story is that bull markets do not like company, the market will do everything it can to make the majority gun shy and keep the bears from recognizing the prevailing trend. Just look at the head fake we had before the close on Friday - frustrating but some times necessary.

Dennis - the bullmeister.

Merrill Lynch U.S. Strategist Richard Bernstein made the following comments about the current status of the yield curve:

Many of our models that incorporate the yield curve are based on monthly average interest rates. Conveniently, the 2s-to-10s yield curve inverted on February 1 and has remained inverted all month. Thus, by our reckoning, the yield curve is now officially inverted. This means several things:


The probability of a profits recession (i.e., two quarters of negative earnings growth for the S&P 500) has significantly risen. Historically, every inverted curve has been followed by a profits recession. Lag times differ, however, between the inversion and the onset of the profits recession. The shortest period between the inversion and the onset of the profits recession was two quarters — the longest was eight quarters.


Because of those varying lead/lag times, we have studied sector performance during the period between the inversion and the onset of the profits recession. Defensive sectors like consumer staples, health care and utilities lead the pack. Technology, consumer discretionary and financials tend to lag.


Many observers will disregard the yield curve's inversion and claim that something is different this time. Of course it could be, but we would caution against taking this line of reasoning because, at every yield-curve inversion, the consensus is that the inversion does not matter, does not signal anything about corporate profits or the economy, or is inverted simply because of bond market technical factors. In 2000, the story was that the curve was inverted simply because the Treasury had stopped issuing 30-year bonds. Nonetheless, the curve inverted and both an economic and profits recession followed.


In our view, an inverted yield curve tells little, if anything, about the direction of the overall stock market. We believe the correlation between the yield curve and the direction of the stock market is basically zero.

http://askmerrill.ml.com/res_article/1,2271,19465,00.html
 
The operative word - in our view

In our view as a Global Securities Research and Economics Group - they all agree on this one point. Otherwise Bernstein is too bearish for me - but you probably like him just fine. When are you going to get out of the G fund? Thanks for reading.
 
Mr Immolator cycle rider

I'm just going to ride this current correction - see where it takes me. Hope I can at least collect a few shares of the C-fund at a $13.70 price.

General Motors is in the process of converting their salaried employees to a defined contribution plan. New employees as of Jan. 1, 2001 are now in a 401 (K) plan. The writing is on the wall too - concerning our own defined benefit plan, it's just a question of when. But if one pays attention in their TSP plan the conversion will ultimately mean greater potential for retirement gains - you just have to learn how to manage your own money. I hope they offer me the chance to convert soon - I'm ready.

The market is currently spooked by interest rates - it has to be something or there would be nothing to worry about. Even though rising rates indicate a growing economy, they can have a tendency to squeeze corporate profits. I'm sticking with Merrill this time around....
 
Have you read Carl Swenlin latest article

Birchtree,

Greetings my friend... I sent you Henry's latest last week, he got squeezed some and went back to 50%. Carl Swenlin is talking rally, but most of the TA's I'm following are in the safety of cash. That's why Carl is probably correct. Read his latest if you get a chance.

http://www.decisionpoint.com/ChartSpotliteFiles/060310_iisent.html

I got tired of only 2 moves a year at Vanguard and opened up a Brokerage Roth IRA with American Century.

I can trade any EFT on the Americian Stock Exchange anytime during the day at the current share price. I still will probably do limited trading, but wanted the ability to sell as often as I wanted to at any time during the day.

Any tips or recommendations would be appreciated. Still keeping most in regular Roth's and Traditional IRA accounts. I'm thinking of trading with around 100k and not planning on shorting. Do you have any Roth's and Traditional IRA's in a Brokerage account or do you use a taxable account. It will cost me 25.00 a transfer, but I don't care based on the flexibility it gives me.

Take Care my friend!!

I hope you have a nice weekend!!!

Robo
 
Last edited:
robo said:
Carl Swenlin is talking rally, but most of the TA's I'm following are in the safety of cash. That's why Carl is probably correct. Read his latest if you get a chance.

I hope you don't mind if I chime in here Birch and Robo... Carl is actually on the bearish side as he believes that we will get that 4 year cycle low sometime in the fall, but his recent bullish reading of this indicator is based on the current, and short term, II sentiment surveys which have been an very interesting phenomenon lately. The market is not really moving down yet sentiment is becoming more and more bearish.

BUT if the market is truley going through a change of character (and I'm not saying it is) this 31% bearish figure, which is one of the highest readings since the market bottomed in early 2003, is actually nowhere near the levels we see in real bear markets when it used to hit 40%, 50% and even 60%.

iisentiment.png

iisentiment2.png


So I believe this is one of those where the market should rally from this level, but if it doesn't we should be prepared for a more prolonged pullback.

Personally I believe that stocks are still very undervalued when comepared to bonds so the downside is a threat, but limited.

Thanks,
Tom
 
Contrarian View

Tom,

I should have been clearer.

Investor's Intelligence sentiment has turned very bearish. This is a bullish development (from a contrarian perspective).

robo
 
No, you were clear. I probably wasn't.

I'm saying that the survey's 31% bearish reading could be bullish for the market based on recent readings (since 2003) but historically this can go much lower (60% or more) meaning the market can still go down much further as 31% is really not that high of a bearish number.

I hope that made sense. These contrarians reading are confusing. :)
 
Back
Top