Bear Cave 2 (Bull Allowed)

SPX Topping Valuations 3

Adam Hamilton
Apr 18, 2014

The lofty stock markets are starting to wobble, with selloffs' frequency and sharpness increasing. The dominant reason the Fed's stock levitation is running out of steam is severe overvaluation. Stocks are just far too expensive today compared to historic precedent, a dangerous state seen when bull markets are topping. Rampant overvaluation is a glaring warning sign to investors that selling is just beginning.

Apr 18, 2014 SPX Topping Valuations 3 Adam Hamilton 321gold ...inc ...s
 
April 14, 2014
Margins, Multiples, and the Iron Law of Valuation

John P. Hussman, Ph.D.
All rights reserved and actively enforced.
Reprint Policy

The equity market remains valued at nearly double its historical norms on reliable measures of valuation (though numerous unreliable alternatives can be sought if one seeks comfort rather than reliability). The same measures that indicated that the S&P 500 was priced in 2009 to achieve 10-14% annual total returns over the next decade presently indicate estimated 10-year nominal total returns of only about 2.7% annually. That’s up from about 2.3% annually last week, which is about the impact that a 4% market decline would be expected to have on 10-year expected returns. I should note that sentiment remains wildly bullish (55% bulls to 19% bears, record margin debt, heavy IPO issuance, record “covenant lite” debt issuance), and fear as measured by option volatilities is still quite contained, but “tail risk” as measured by option skew remains elevated. In all, the recent pullback is nowhere near the scale that should be considered material. What’s material is the extent of present market overvaluation, and the continuing breakdown in market internals we’re observing. Remember – most market tops are not a moment but a process. Plunges and spikes of several percent in either direction are typically forgettable and irrelevant in the context of the fluctuations that occur over the complete cycle.

Hussman Funds - Weekly Market Comment: Margins, Multiples, and the Iron Law of Valuation - April 14, 2014
 
Someone much smarter in these things than I please help me here. I'm not an economist so if this is a flawed thought, please forgive me ahead of time. It would seem that the amount of currency available by the public to invest and the number of people investing would be a factor in explaining increased valuations. It seems that given the increase in the number of people investing due to more 401(k) and IRA accounts and the increased amount of currency in circulation would naturally drive valuations higher, especially for those stocks in the most popular index funds (say the S&P 500). So comparison of today's valuations to valuations in the past isn't an apples to apples comparison... Is it? Wouldn't there need to be some kind of adjustment factor?? Curious....
 
Someone much smarter in these things than I please help me here. I'm not an economist so if this is a flawed thought, please forgive me ahead of time. It would seem that the amount of currency available by the public to invest and the number of people investing would be a factor in explaining increased valuations. It seems that given the increase in the number of people investing due to more 401(k) and IRA accounts and the increased amount of currency in circulation would naturally drive valuations higher, especially for those stocks in the most popular index funds (say the S&P 500). So comparison of today's valuations to valuations in the past isn't an apples to apples comparison... Is it? Wouldn't there need to be some kind of adjustment factor?? Curious....

I'm no expert either and fundamental analysis is not my thing, but off the top of my head:

One meaningful, quick and realistic way to compare valuations of the past, or at any time, is to use the PE Ratios (Price-to-Earnings) of the company. This will cancel out the effects of inflation. (It can get more complicated/accurate when you start to take into account the assets/debts of the company, etc.).

Hope this helps:)
 
Thanks Que. Yes, I get P/E. My point though is if more currency is in circulation (we're at an all time high) then more dollars are available to purchase equities pushing the P in the P/E up. More people are investing through investment and retirement accts. There is just more money being put in play than ever before - it has to have an effect on the purchase price of equites. Sort of an inflation thing. I guess what I'm wondering is if P/E's of today need to be normalized in some way to be comparable to P/E's of the past (even the somewhat recent past). If true then higher valuations may not need to be as much a concern as some might want to think (within reason and considering the other important fundamentals of a company in question). Just thinking out loud here....
 
Thanks Que. Yes, I get P/E. My point though is if more currency is in circulation (we're at an all time high) then more dollars are available to purchase equities pushing the P in the P/E up. More people are investing through investment and retirement accts. There is just more money being put in play than ever before - it has to have an effect on the purchase price of equites. Sort of an inflation thing. I guess what I'm wondering is if P/E's of today need to be normalized in some way to be comparable to P/E's of the past (even the somewhat recent past). If true then higher valuations may not need to be as much a concern as some might want to think (within reason and considering the other important fundamentals of a company in question). Just thinking out loud here....

I don't think most want p/e's (and the like...peg, etc.) 'normalized.' 10 x earnings means the same today as it did in the past.

For example, cars cost more now than in the past, but are they more expensive now than then? How can we know? We compare it to a constant: earnings. If cars cost one year's earnings in the past, and cost one year's earnings now; then it could be argued that they are not more expensive. The use of a ratio cancels out the inflation factor. It is a way to compare the past with now.

UPDATE: You wouldn't want to say, to the effect of, if not in these exact words, "well, let's change the formulas so that these cars today, that cost 2 years' earnings are considered the same as cars in the past that cost 1 years' earnings."

P/e is the same way.

Things will normalize themselves when the bubble bursts and irrational exuberance fades away. :)

Sorry I can't explain it better.:(
 
Last edited:
A few of the discount brokers are beginning to experience record volume transactions - it would seem mom and pop are coming back to equities. The question now is are they coming back close to a top or will they push the market much, much, higher. I think they will be buying along with me for the next decade.
 
A few of the discount brokers are beginning to experience record volume transactions - it would seem mom and pop are coming back to equities. The question now is are they coming back close to a top or will they push the market much, much, higher. I think they will be buying along with me for the next decade.


The longer-term cycles indicate share prices will be deeply discounted in the next few years as the S&P 500 heads back under 1000. Since you are a long-term investor it will not matter, but I'll wait for PE ratios to get back under 10 again before I buy the S&P 500 for a position trade or an investment.

Took another beating on my GDXJ shares, so I converted 2000 shares into a Roth during this beat down so when they double or triple in the next year the money will be tax free.

Did the same thing in December of 2013 when prices were very low.... No need for us to make are next Million and have to pay taxes on it. Well, maybe a half million.

Take care and have a nice Easter.

Sometimes I don't post for a few weeks due to my health.....I'm taking Amitriptyline for fibromyalgia pain, and sometimes I'm just not up to reading or posting.

We are close to the next big move up for the gold miners in my opinion, but for now the sell-off continues. Watching to see if gold breaks thru 1280/1260 support levels...and if it does..... after that maybe much lower, but I'll keep adding shares of GDXJ like I always do.
 
April 21, 2014
The Federal Reserve's Two Legged Stool


So yes, the equity market is in extremely speculative territory. For the median stock, the overvaluation is more extreme than in 2000. For the broad capitalization-weighted market, the Fed has elevated valuations to the level that promises poor investment returns, and negative real returns – from present levels – for at least a decade. If the Fed truly wishes to achieve its mandate of long run price stability and maximum employment, another leg of the stool is needed in Fed policy, and that is the avoidance of actions that promote yield-seeking speculation and malinvestment.

It is too late to avoid that outcome in this cycle, as it has already occurred. Now we must manage the consequences. One hopes that those consequences will be contained to the financial markets and not the broad economy. Oversight – particularly in leveraged equity, leveraged loans, and covenant lite lending – should be far higher on the agenda than promoting further overvaluation and speculation, in the hope that some small benefit will trickle down to the masses.

Hussman Funds - Weekly Market Comment
 
Dear subscribers,


This is update #1994 for Sunday evening, April 20, 2014.


VIX slumped once again to another important higher low, which it has done repeatedly since March 2013 each time that U.S. equity indices are set for their next correction. Therefore, expect an upcoming decline for the S&P 500, the Russell 2000, and funds which are closely correlated with these. Meanwhile, U.S. Treasuries climbed to their highest points in ten months, which has made them vulnerable to soon resuming their bear markets which began at their all-time peaks in July 2012. As both stocks and bonds will spend the next year declining moderately, investors will be eager to own the relatively few assets which are rallying. Gold and silver mining shares have recently been weak, and should soon resume their uptrends which began in December 2013 and were interrupted by corrections after too many investors became excited about these during the late winter. At Thursday's 3:37 p.m. low of 34.525, GDXJ had slumped almost exactly one fourth from its peak of 46.00 on March 14, 2014. The next important short-term high for GDXJ will likely be in the mid-50s on its way to eventually quadrupling from its December 23, 2013 low of 28.82. As is frequently the case during corrections--but not during true bear markets--GDX has formed several higher intraday lows since March 27, 2014 which are detailed in the paragraph just above today's main topic. I am continuing to shift the most depressed assets from non-Roth retirement accounts into Roth accounts to lock in their valuations for tax purposes and to ensure that all future gains will be tax free.

True Contrarian
 
A few of the discount brokers are beginning to experience record volume transactions - it would seem mom and pop are coming back to equities. The question now is are they coming back close to a top or will they push the market much, much, higher. I think they will be buying along with me for the next decade.

A comment below from Kaplan about folks coming back to equities. Now, he could be completely incorrect, or his timing could be way off and the Bull is far from over, and you are correct. We shall find out in the next few years.


Equities more recently experienced near-record inflows combined with all-time record margin debt and classic signs of investor exuberance. Thus, their bear markets are younger, and could continue for as long as three more years. The first year of a bear market is generally accompanied by moderate declines, which encourages investors to keep hanging on and hoping for the best when they should be most aggressive in reducing their exposure. We have already begun to experience a key transition in which the biggest high-flying names of the past several months, including many technology favorites, have been among the weakest performers, while some of the worst performers of 2013 have been among the most notable winners. This process is still in its early stages and hasn't been widely trumpeted by the mainstream financial media. The pattern of numerous higher lows for VIX since March 14, 2013, which was an almost exact repeat of its behavior after December 15, 2006, has been ignored by virtually everyone, while very few well-known analysts (with the notable exception of Michael A. Gayed as pointed out in a link earlier in this update) have pointed out the failure of the Russell 2000 and other small-cap benchmarks to surpass their early March 2014 all-time highs while the S&P 500 Index and Dow Jones Industrial Average were repeatedly setting new tops in April. Investors generally have no clue that we are almost certainly on the verge of another crushing bear market where U.S. equities lose more than 50% of their value--and probably more than 60%--during the next few years.

True Contrarian


http://www.minyanville.com/trading-...-Gayed-Will-Small-Caps-Get/4/16/2014/id/54630
 
Watch Out for This "Sell" Signal
By Jeff Clark
Tuesday, April 22, 2014

If you took our advice to buy stocks last week, you're up a solid amount.

Last Tuesday, stocks looked like they were heading over the cliff. The S&P 500 traded as low as 1,815. Many investors thought the long-awaited correction was finally here.

But we said this old bull market still had one more kick left in it. So the selloff had us looking to buy stocks in anticipation of a rally going into the end of the month.

On Thursday, the S&P 500 closed at about 1,865 – up 2.7% from Tuesday's low. That's a solid return for two trading days. And there's more to come. But there's also trouble brewing around the corner...

With more than a week to go before the end of this seasonal bullish period, there's a good chance the S&P 500 will make a run at the 1,900 level.

But there's a reason Wall Street veterans "sell in May and go away." Historically, the first day of May kicks off a seasonally weak period for stock prices.

Growth Stock Wire | Stock Market Analysis, Market News & Stock Picks
 
This is special intraday update #1995c for Tuesday morning, April 22, 2014.


I bought HDGE at 12.79 and then at 12.69, each using 0.10% of my net worth. I would rate each of these trades as a 7.5; now that the Russell 2000 has failed to confirm the April 2014 peaks for the S&P 500, the likelihood that U.S. equities are in a bear market has become far greater. We are unlikely to have a 2014 collapse as many bearish analysts have foolishly been predicting, since most bear markets begin quietly and only accelerate after a downtrend has been intact and has been forming several lower highs for a year or more. Therefore, there will be numerous opportunities to buy HDGE at higher lows and to otherwise take advantage of what will likely be a severe bear market--perhaps leading to even greater percentage declines than the crushing 2007-2009 plunge. This is partly because we reached higher highs in 2014 than we had achieved in 2007, so if we slump to the same absolute bottoms it will represent a greater total loss for most U.S. equity indices.

True Contrarian
 
The Cost of Code Red

By John Mauldin

April 26, 2014


(It is especially important to read the opening quotes this week. They set up the theme in the proper context.)

“There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.”

– Ludwig von Mises

“No very deep knowledge of economics is usually needed for grasping the immediate effects of a measure; but the task of economics is to foretell the remoter effects, and so to allow us to avoid such acts as attempt to remedy a present ill by sowing the seeds of a much greater ill for the future.”

– Ludwig von Mises

“[Central banks are at] serious risk of exhausting the policy room for manoeuver over time.”

– Jaime Caruana, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements

“The gap between the models in the world of monetary policymaking is now wider than at any time since the 1930s.”

– Benjamin Friedman, William Joseph Maier Professor of Political Economy, Harvard

To listen to most of the heads of the world’s central banks, things are going along swimmingly. The dogmatic majority exude a great deal of confidence in their ability to manage their economies through whatever crisis may present itself. (Raghuram Rajan, the sober-minded head of the Reserve Bank of India, is a notable exception.)

However, there is reason to believe that there have been major policy mistakes made by central banks – and…

The Cost of Code Red | Thoughts from the Frontline Investment Newsletter | Mauldin Economics
 
April 28, 2014
The Future is Now
John P. Hussman, Ph.D.

I’ve historically encouraged buy-and-hold investors to maintain their own investment discipline, though with a realistic and historically-informed understanding of prospective return and risk. At present, my concern is that many buy-and-hold investors are unaware of how dismal prospective returns are likely to be from current prices, over every investment horizon of a decade or less. Given the duration of the equity market (which mathematically works out to be roughly the market price/dividend multiple), a passive 100% exposure to equities is appropriate only for investors with a horizon of about 50 years. Passive buy-and-hold investors would be well-advised to scale their equity exposures accordingly, based on their own actual investment horizons. Meanwhile, it seems clear that investors have mentally minimized their concept of potential downside, despite two 50% bear market losses in recent memory that were both accompanied by aggressive Fed easing all the way down.

At present, the picture below is just a monthly chart of the S&P 500 since 1995. Not long from now, perhaps less than 2 or 3 years, many investors will look at the same chart with their head in their hands, asking “What was I thinking?” The central message to investors with unhedged equity positions and investment horizons shorter than about 7 years: Prospective returns have reached zero. The value you seek from selling in the future is already on the table today. The future is now.

Hussman Funds - Weekly Market Comment: The Future is Now - April 28, 2014
 
Sunday, May 4, 2014

COMMODITIES MOVING DOWN INTO THE MIDYEAR CORRECTION


So far my 2014 expectations are playing out pretty much as planned, with a few adjustments. With the threat of war in the Ukraine I think the final bubble phase in stocks is now off the table. I doubt we can get the euphoric buying pressure necessary to generate a parabola as long as tensions in Eastern Europe continue to escalate. No bubble phase in stocks = no capitulation phase in gold. The Ukraine event was a game changer.

Gold Scents
 
Wednesday, April 30, 2014"Inflation is when you pay fifteen dollars for the ten-dollar haircut you used to get for five dollars when you had hair." --Sam Ewing
INFLATION IS THE LEAST APPRECIATED PHENOMENON TODAY (April 30, 2014):

If you were to poll ten thousand investors about what is most likely to occur in the worldwide economy during the upcoming twelve to fifteen months, then rising inflationary expectations would probably be among the least popular responses. However, evidence demonstrates that there has already been the kind of behavior which typifies a period of global reflation. Commodities from coffee to corn to limes to palladium to soybeans have been surging in recent months, while gasoline (petrol) prices recently climbed to 13-month highs. Each of these so far has been attributed to a separate localized reason rather than the unifying theme of rising prices, but eventually these will be recognized as part of a related theme. Rents have been steadily rising in the U.S. and around the world, while wages have been increasing at their fastest pace since before the last recession as unemployment especially among skilled workers has declined to a sufficiently low point where there is a shortage of qualified candidates in many fields and particularly in certain specialties.

The U.S. Federal Reserve appears to be obsessed with the risk of deflation, while being unconcerned about the possibility of rising prices. Because the Fed wants higher U.S. housing prices, the usually inflation-wary Fed is likely to continue to be especially accommodative toward allowing inflation to move higher especially if this helps to keep unemployment low. The Fed giving the green light to rising prices is especially dangerous, since history has demonstrated that once inflation appears it will become quite challenging to suppress. The shares of companies which benefit from rising inflationary expectations, including most emerging-market equities and commodity producers, had mostly bottomed at five-year lows at various points from June 2013 through March 2014 and have begun what could become dramatic uptrends as they revisit their respective peak levels from 2013, 2012, and 2011, in that order.

General U.S. equity indices have likely terminated their uptrends which mostly began in early March 2009. Whenever we are transitioning from a U.S. equity bull market to a bear market, inflation historically is most likely to emerge. This is partly because companies and employees are reluctant to raise prices or to ask for higher wages when memories of the previous recession remain fresh. As time passes and four or five years have passed since the last economic downturn, companies and individuals become bolder in asking for more money to buy their goods or to compensate them for their services. Thus, inflation becomes artificially depressed in the early years following any recession, and later accelerates dramatically in order to catch up to reality.

As a result, we have a situation in which the Fed is concerned with deflation and nearly all investors aren't worried about inflation, while historically we are maximally likely to experience rising prices for goods and services. This will lead to what appears to be a "sudden, unexpected" inflationary surge which will of course be completely predictable, just as we had previously experienced in 2007-2008, 1972-1973, 1936-1937, and during similar periods near the beginning of important U.S. equity bear markets. In 2008, the prices of many energy and agricultural products surged to their highest levels in decades. Everyone in July 2008 was worried about how much higher gasoline prices would become. A half year later, no one was concerned about gasoline while everyone feared that they would lose their jobs. We are likely to experience a similar economic sequence during the next two to three years, where we first have concerns about rising prices--and then, less than a year later, everyone has shifted their focus to the serious problems facing a contracting global economy.

During this kind of transition, the shares of mining companies and emerging-market equities are often among the top performers during the first year following the end of a U.S. equity bull market, with long-dated U.S. Treasuries generally being the biggest winners during the second and sometimes the third year. Investors will progressively realize that they can no longer make money by remaining in their favorite securities, and will eagerly seek out whichever alternatives appear to have established the strongest uptrends. Now is the ideal time to own many of the funds listed in the following paragraph; during the first half of 2015, it will likely become timely to gradually shift out of these and into pure U.S. Treasury funds including TLT and ZROZ. Especially since so few investors recognize or appreciate patterns which have occurred repeatedly in past decades, very few people have positioned themselves to profit from global reflation. Therefore, if you take action sooner rather than later, you will be among the first to embrace this concept. As Warren Buffett has sagely said, what one wise investor does in the beginning many fools do in the end.

True Contrarian
 
November 4, 2013
Leash the Dogma

John P. Hussman, Ph.D.

For the sake of completeness, I should also note that virtually every “overvalued, overbought, overbullish” syndrome we define is on red alert. I hesitate a bit on this point, because in contrast to nearly a century of market history where these syndromes were reliably associated with deep losses, the emergence of these syndromes since late-2011 has repeatedly been followed by yet further speculation (see the chart in The Road to Easy Street). My impression remains that this is not a permanent change in market dynamics, but simply reflects an anvil that has not yet dropped. So these syndromes have admittedly done us no favors in the more recent period. Still, it remains our job, and our discipline, to view market action within its full historical context.

In any event, I continue to believe that it is plausible to expect the S&P 500 to lose 40-55% of its value over the completion of the present cycle, and suspect that whatever further gains the market enjoys from this point will be surrendered in the first few complacent weeks following the market’s peak. That’s how it works. If all of this seems like hyperbole, please recall my similar concern at the 2007 peak (see Fair Value – 40% Off), and the negative 10-year return projections – even on best-case assumptions – that we correctly estimated for the S&P 500 in 2000. These numbers relate to the striking gap between present valuation levels and normal historical precedent, not to personal opinion.

None of our own challenges in this decidedly unfinished half-cycle relate to our consistent ability to correctly assess long-term investment prospects. We may yet see some amount of further short-term speculation, but already for the median stock, the long-term investment outlook has never been worse.

Hussman Funds - Weekly Market Comment: Leash the Dogma - November 4, 2013
 
Major Stock Selloff Looms

Adam Hamilton
Archives
May 09, 2014

A major selloff is brewing in the lofty US stock markets, which have been grinding sideways for a couple months now. Momentum has faded despite selective positive earnings-season news and Janet Yellen's jawboning. Stocks remain very overvalued, way too expensive for prudent investors to buy. And it's been far too long since their last necessary and healthy correction to rebalance sentiment, so one is seriously overdue.

Last year's extraordinary stock-market levitation has run out of steam. In the 15.7 months leading into early March 2014, the flagship S&P 500 stock index blasted 38.8% higher! Capital indiscriminately flooded into stocks regardless of fundamentals or valuations because the Federal Reserve was doing its darnedest to convince traders that it was effectively backstopping the stock markets. This bred extreme complacency.

Top Fed officials including Ben Bernanke and now Janet Yellen kept implying that the Fed was ready to spin up its monetary printing presses to arrest any meaningful stock-market selloff. So traders greedily bought stocks, ignoring all normal stock-market-topping warning signs. But in the past couple months, this buying has largely vanished. While the S&P 500 has stalled, hyper-overvalued momentum stocks are crumbling.

May 09, 2014 Major Stock Selloff Looms Adam Hamilton 321gold ...inc ...s
 
Back
Top