alevin
Well-known member
thanks Steady.
Another little something I was contemplating recently, hadn't gotten around to posting yet. Basically, it edicated me about P/E ratios and how they differ between cyclical bears and secular bears. I've been waiting for 7x P/Es, but didn't realize you only get those at bottom of secular bears, which don't come til nearly the end of the secular cycle. the one we're in is only about halfway through, which fits other prognoses I've seen that things will really really tank about the time I'm due to retire around 2019 or so. Per this article we're in a cyclical bear within the secular bear. If this is the cyclical, what's the secular going to be like?
http://www.zealllc.com/2009/bearcyc.htm
Another little something I was contemplating recently, hadn't gotten around to posting yet. Basically, it edicated me about P/E ratios and how they differ between cyclical bears and secular bears. I've been waiting for 7x P/Es, but didn't realize you only get those at bottom of secular bears, which don't come til nearly the end of the secular cycle. the one we're in is only about halfway through, which fits other prognoses I've seen that things will really really tank about the time I'm due to retire around 2019 or so. Per this article we're in a cyclical bear within the secular bear. If this is the cyclical, what's the secular going to be like?
Realize that today’s bearish arguments stating that 7x earnings wasn’t hit in March, so therefore today’s stock markets can’t be in a new bull, are totally specious. Anyone advancing this 7x thesis does not understand stock bears and has not studied them. Major and very profitable cyclical bulls can erupt within secular bears from all kinds of valuation levels. 7x earnings are not seen until the very end of a secular bear!
[which started in 2000-per this article-as well as others I've been reading].If you carefully study this chart, it utterly shatters the popular notion among traders today that a stock bear can’t end until we see 7x earnings. While a secular bear won’t end until such low valuations are seen, cyclical bears can end regardless of where valuations happen to be because valuations are not what drive these cyclical moves within secular trends.
In the last secular bear that ended in 1982, general stock valuations did indeed fall under a P/E ratio of 7x earnings. But it didn’t happen until 17 years in! In October 1966, the SPX bottomed at 18.8x earnings and then rallied 48% by November 1968. In May 1970 the SPX bottomed again at 13.8x earnings, still way above the 7x metric. Yet out of those “overvalued” lows a strong 74% cyclical bull emerged that ran until January 1973. And this pattern goes on and on if you follow the red line above.
The key point is that cyclical-bear bottoms within secular bears don’t require any certain P/E-ratio level. That is a misleading myth propagated by sloppy analysts too lazy to actually study market history. Cyclical bears bottom when stocks get too oversold near the bottom of their secular-bear trading range, it has nothing to do with valuations. The best example of this ironclad truth is from our current secular bear
http://www.zealllc.com/2009/bearcyc.htm
Last edited: