The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the
IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
It's all in the graph design. Just need the Y axis to run from 0 to 100.Presto back to American Idol Wasteland.
Soon to be made in China!Well I'm off...Just got a phone call from the State police, knowing I have the HUMMER, wanting help getting people stranded out stuck in their cars along the interstates and highways..A real mess..I gassed up last night figuring this would happen..It will be a blast blowing through the drifts..God Bless the HUMMER
![]()
Not much snow in San Diego, but we do get down into the forties at night. Daytime temps are in the seventies, so we warm up pretty quick! It was cold yesterday, with a steady drizzle falling and highs in the low sixties. I actually needed my jacket to go to the store!:laugh: Where's that global warming thing I keep hearing about?I can really feel the global warming here in Missouri this morning. I don't think that even with the sun up and 10 deg temp is going to melt much of the snow.![]()
I watch How the Earth was Made again. Next phase will be a ice sheet that reaches down to Missouri. One like it years ago carved out the Great Lakes and then filled them up when it melted. Now that's power!!
Trivia, largest salt mine in the world under the Lakes. At one time was a inland sea. Lowest point in North American is the bottom of Lake Superior, also deepest lake. Next, lower water levels in the Lakes is being caused in part by post glacial rebound now that all the weight is off of the crust. Lakes have been shrinking in size for centuries as they can identify all the different beach heads well above the current water levels.
Note: We are insignificant compared to the grander scheme of things.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-glacial_rebound
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:Don't drop your sunglasses out of the boat there. lol
I watched the AZ and Neb..game..thought they were playing in Nebraska at first with all the snow coming down...:nuts:Not much snow in San Diego, but we do get down into the forties at night. Daytime temps are in the seventies, so we warm up pretty quick! It was cold yesterday, with a steady drizzle falling and highs in the low sixties. I actually needed my jacket to go to the store!:laugh: Where's that global warming thing I keep hearing about?
HA!..And what was that I quoted somebody saying about WIKI?...Oh, yeah, I remember..Wiki is trying to clean house. At least in this area.
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/12/wikipedia-agw-bias-wiki-censor-william-connolley-axed/
Buster;241904]Yes and what About Wiki ?
Since Wikipedia is in reality a vast and changing document the answers can only be general. The information contained in Wikipedia, like all information, depends on the knowledge or the ability of the person giving the information. Where they don't have specific knowledge of a particular subject they rely on the accuracy of their sources of information, which may be limited or, in questions of opinion, may give a somewhat biased view, (as everyone tends to do) based on the conclusions they have reached from their own viewpoint and/or study.
Another problem with Wikipedia is that it is 'consensus driven' in that the policy regarding answers relating to opinion requires a consensus view to be put. This may be the correct view, or as we all know, 'the majority is not always right.' The majority once thought the earth was the center of the universe. Thus we end up with pooled ignorance.
On matters of opinion, such as religious or moral questions, there must be due recognition that any answer will inevitably reflect either the bias of the writer of the article or the current consensus view or what the author or authors think is the current consensus view. All of these could be wrong, either in whole or in part, but will naturally be well-presented as fact and with supporting argumentation, which may or may not be spurious, if one does not have the knowledge to critique it.
In other words, as with anything, learn to check your facts, no matter how well argued.
Wiki is trying to clean house. At least in this area.
http://deathby1000papercuts.com/2009/12/wikipedia-agw-bias-wiki-censor-william-connolley-axed/

Looks like another sleepless night for me.
I'm just sick over this and don't see how anyone with such outstanding character could do such a thing. He looks like he could easily be a distinguished university professor - maybe a Nobel Prize Winner - ..... how could he do this ???
And worse of all -- we know members of this MB use the Wikipedia as though it's the sacred truth.
How could he not know the dangers of MEDIA POWER and it's ability to sway the masses? How could he not realize the millions of people having uncontrolled anxiety and the endless hardships that would spread across the globe?
Yet when you see the little Bear in his pack you have to know deep down he's a tender, loving, caring individual.