I stand corrected and I appologize; if we have a winning chance then we should fight with all our might and not give up until the battle is over. I THOUGHT THE BATTLE WAS OVER. I can absolutely guarantee you that only a very small fraction of the existing .01% have any idea we may still have a chance. [/COLOR][/B]
SO PLEASE IGNORE MY PREVIOUS MESSAGE.
The battle is NOT over. The battle has only just begun. If this were a baseball game, the opposing side has batted in the first inning, and we're now up to bat.
There will be LOTS of back and forth in this game to come.
Look at it this way-
First of all, there IS NO PROBLEM.
1. As pointed out in the actual statistics, the funds are all beating the indexes they are supposed to represent. That is the job of the TSP Board- to try and meet those indexes. Period. If they are able to bring returns that meet or beat the indexes, they have done there primary job.
2. And then there is the cost arguement. TSP is already less than one-tenth the administrative cost of any comparable mutual fund. The is NOT a cost problem. Period. So TSP has already done there job.
3. The "proposed solution" is not a solution at all. Limiting intefund trasnfers does NOT increase the fund's return. As pointed out before, part of the reason the funds BEAT the indexes already is that Barclays is now using "Covered calls" and "fair value adjustments" that operate properly off the fact that people are moving funds. If you impose these draconian restrictions, you HARM the rate of return, not help it. Anyone who has done the actual math, and reviewed the actual data, would discover this fact. It is up to us to shine a BRIGHT LIGHT on truth for all the world to see.
4. It doesn't matter if it is ONE PERSON, or 3,000 who are adversely affected. The fact is that the Thrift Board is able to ram through restrictions without being questioned is what is at stake here. So today "someone" * (Tracey Ray) discovered something that has been going on since the day they invested HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS OF OUR MONEY to allow- the daily movement of funds. This is nothing new. But SHE suddenly discovers it, and decides "it must be a problem", because it doesn't fit with HER concept of how people should handle their own money.
She is entitled to HER concept of how people should handle their own money. However, she is NOT entitled to impose that concept on others. Heck, half the people in the TSP are uneducated or fearful to the point that they never stray out of the G fund. THEY are the ones that Tracey Ray should focus on. Educating them, not handcuffing us.
And that is the whole point. There IS NO "One size fits all" correct way to handle money. Some people need risk, others need safety. Each individual needs to know his/her own situation, and decide for themselves what THEY need to try and accomplish.
Sure, there will be both winners and losers when people are allowed the freedom to try. But THAT is the Thrift Board's job- to allow for the maximum freedom of people to invest for their own retirement. As long as the funds are meeting the indexes, fine. As long as adminstrative costs are "low", (No one can argue that costs one-tenth the costs of average mutual funds are not low), they are doing their job. At that point, the Thrift Board needs to step back and get out of the way. Period.
The vast majority of the "0.1%" KNOW ALREADY that this action is wrong. The vast majority of those 0.1% already know that the Thrift Board is incorrect in identifying the "problem", and the vast majority of those already know that the "solution" being proposed is NOT going to have a positive affect on the returns or the costs. It is EXACTLY because the vast majority of those 0.1% UNDERSTAND how the system is working, how the costs are allocated, how Barclays is working the system, and how THEY = the 0.1% = are able to influence the outcome ONLY IF THEY ALL STAND TOGETHER, and shine the light of truth on this.
This IS the American way.
Truth. Justice. American Way.
Soapbox mode off......