Stealth Rally

00.thumbnail.stealth.jpg

Perhaps it was inspired by a meeting currently in progress at Jackson Hole, WY, or more to the point, by a perceived Fed rescue, but whatever the reason today's action caught the bears off-guard as a seemingly innocuous open turned into a full blown bullish assault that saw the major averages post hefty gains across the board. At the close, the DOW had rallied 2.97%, the Nasdaq 4.29%, and the S&P 500 3.43%.

During the course of the rally stocks did see a brief, relatively shallow sell-off that came in response to reports of a moderate earthquake striking the Washington, D.C. area, but even that bit of unexpected news did little to squash the bullish party once it was learned that no major damage or casualties were reported.

And while the bull was doing a dance, gold fell 1.4% to a closing price of $1863.50 per ounce, while treasuries were relatively flat.

So what do we make of today's action? We know how volatile this market can be and we seem to have a catalyst in the form of a potential Fed rescue to explain the seemingly unfounded buying spree. Buying the rumor? And what happens once the Fed Chairman makes his anticipated media appearance at the conclusion of this year's Federal Reserve symposium?

While gold may have fallen and treasures finished flat, neither indicator seemed to suggest the reality of our current economic situation has changed. Is that a clue to the not-so-distant future of stock prices?

Here's today's charts:

NAMO-NYMO.jpg

Both NAMO and NYMO added to their modest gains yesterdays and are now both sitting near the net-neutral line. Both are also now flashing buys.

NAHL-NYHL.jpg

NAHL and NYHL are also now back to buy conditions.

TRIN-TRINQ.jpg

Yesterday I had said that "these two signals suggest that a bit more upside may come in the short term, but I'm not expecting anything significant."

I was only half right in that we got the upside, but rather than token upside action we got a significant rally. Both remain in buy conditions as a result and believe it or not, neither is suggesting more than modestly overbought conditions, which means more upside may be on the way.

BPCOMPQ.png

Yes, it's been on a buy all along, but BPCOMPQ has shown little to inspire its buy condition as it has grudgingly fallen for a number of days. Until today that is, but only in modest measure as it turned up just a bit on today's action.

So all Seven Sentinels are back in an unconfirmed buy condition, while the system officially remains on an intermediate term sell. To confirm a buy condition NYMO needs to rise above its Aug 15th high of about 38 on the chart, which is not all that far off if this rally has any legs.

And would I follow such a signal should it be produced before the Fed announcement on Friday?

Not a chance.
 
This past week feels so much like 1978/79 climax selling - also known as massacres. I rode those and I'll keep riding this one as I continue to buy at golden prices.
 
Sure hope you are correct Birch!! Felt like I should roll in to G Fund today to lock in this bounce, but did not.... Will hold out for more upside... Have to gain 10% soon to get back to even for the month!
 
isnt it too early to price in fed friday? i would understand if its wednesday but not today... i hope for another couple days like today so we can lessen the loss :)
 
Dutchy;bt3857 said:
Sure hope you are correct Birch!! Felt like I should roll in to G Fund today to lock in this bounce, but did not.... Will hold out for more upside... Have to gain 10% soon to get back to even for the month!
11573217739byzjZ.jpg


Aye Mon,
Suckah rally today based on Voodoo economics,
Dat bad US data mean im traders hopin Ben be givin more QE gov't subsidy to Wall St,
You had im fleeting window to exit, before greed kill ya, like it be killin da man of white bark,
Da "G" ganga fund was yer potential saviour b4 clock struck im noon trading deadline.
Only one ting can cure yer pain now, I go prepare it fer you,
I roll im dutchy...to smoke yer pain away,
If you iz lucky, and market only slightly down,
you would be wise to vacate today before TSP deadline,
let other sucka's hold door to sucka's rally,
Wait till time be in right to strike in stocks,
Dat be in aftah Labor dey, near SP 975-1050.
Peace Mon,
:)

 
How much turnover has there been in the Top 50 since this route and rally craze hit?
 
At yesterday's close, the Top 50s total stock exposure was 28.04%. They began the week at 13%. I noticed most of the stock holders are in the upper end of the Top 50 (1-21), so some jumped on this rally pretty quick and did not rise from lower levels.

Unregistered;bt3864 said:
How much turnover has there been in the Top 50 since this route and rally craze hit?
 
Ah, you sort of answered my ambiguous question. Thanks, CH. I meant how many of the Top 50 individuals now were in the Top 50 then (say, 8/1)? My impression is that from week to week under normal conditions, only a handful might be toppled, and many weeks there will be no change. During a bloodbath like this, you have to be nimble to maintain your throne. I would compare names, but I don't have the data. I don't imagine you would either, so I should be asking whats-his-name, the site owner.
Sadly, I was not so nimble. Wishful thinking (then unavailability) kept me in longer than was prudent. Since then, I have correctly called the big reverses and I could have recouped my losses if we weren't limited in trades.
-pax

coolhand;bt3865 said:
At yesterday's close, the Top 50s total stock exposure was 28.04%. They began the week at 13%. I noticed most of the stock holders are in the upper end of the Top 50 (1-21), so some jumped on this rally pretty quick and did not rise from lower levels.

FireWeatherMet, hilarious post. Thanks, mon.
 
I see. I don't maintain a list of names, only the statistics. And I only take that snapshot on last day of the week (usually Friday). You are correct that most weeks the names don't change much, but when volatility gets crazy, folks are more likely to drop off or jump up depending on how they were positioned relative to the market.

Unregistered;bt3878 said:
Ah, you sort of answered my ambiguous question. Thanks, CH. I meant how many of the Top 50 individuals now were in the Top 50 then (say, 8/1)? My impression is that from week to week under normal conditions, only a handful might be toppled, and many weeks there will be no change. During a bloodbath like this, you have to be nimble to maintain your throne. I would compare names, but I don't have the data. I don't imagine you would either, so I should be asking whats-his-name, the site owner.
Sadly, I was not so nimble. Wishful thinking (then unavailability) kept me in longer than was prudent. Since then, I have correctly called the big reverses and I could have recouped my losses if we weren't limited in trades.
-pax



FireWeatherMet, hilarious post. Thanks, mon.
 
Back
Top