The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the
IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
ALL
Check out the Politics site at the top right of the page, it has turned ridiculous and I won't even look at it. I think it belongs there and not here.![]()
ALL
Check out the Politics site at the top right of the page, it has turned ridiculous and I won't even look at it. I think it belongs there and not here.![]()
I dont car what the pundits may say
The boy / perp is out of his ever-loving mind.
The sheriff dumpnik knew about this kid long before he went postal.![]()
According to the Washington Post, Arizona has a law on the books that enables anyone to identify a potential victim of mental illness, and remand them for treatment:
Under Arizona law, any one of Jared Lee Loughner’s classmates or teachers at Pima Community College so concerned about his increasingly bizarre behavior could have contacted local officials and asked that he be evaluated for mental illness and potentially committed for psychiatric treatment.
That, according to local mental health and law enforcement officials, never happened.
“To the best of our knowledge, he was never and is currently not enrolled in our system,” said Neal Cash, president of the Community Partnership of Southern Arizona, which provides mental health services in Tucson and Pima County for the state. While most of those it serves are on Medicaid, Cash said anyone diagnosed with a serious mental illness would be in its system.
This is all well and good, but WaPo is leaving a lot out, and indirectly blaming Loughner’s teachers and classmates for not taking advantage of the law. First of all, Arizonans generally don’t appear to be aware of this law. Second, it requires them to petition a court – a laborious procedure that a mere acquaintance may not be willing or even equipped to undertake. Third, Arizona’s lax gun laws failed to catch what Pima Community College did do to Loughner – suspend him from school and disallowing him to return without a mental health clearance. Even if this didn’t trigger anything in the gun background check, you’d think this would have raised the awareness of the people most inclined to get counseling for Loughner, his parents.
But the most glaring oversight here, what WaPo waits until paragraph 21 to tell you, in a story told almost entirely from the perspective of mental health professionals in Arizona, is that the state is one of the worst in the nation at delivering mental health services, and cut back significantly on its mental health programs during the Great Recession in order to balance their budget. That’s not paragraph 21 information; it undermines the entire premise of the article.
On a lighter note, has anyone seen the picture of the shooter?? My first thought was dang, this looks like “Uncle Fester” from that old 1960’s TV show, “The Addams Family”... You know, that dude that could light up a bulb in his mouth...
I wouldn't take it personal Cr...Fab was using the typical expression for someone going/gone crazy..we all know where it comes from, let's not pretend we don't understand it....just like we all know that the USPS workers are wonderful, dedicated public servants of whom we all love and respect..I gave my letter-carrier a $50.00 GC to Lowe's this year..
We all use words that graphically describes something or someone, but without malice or personal intent of harm or disrespect of others...like when we refer to something or someone as a "retard" or "retarded"..Just an expression..Parents of children with Downs..don't like the expression and take issue just as you did with "Going Postal"..
So in that context..I will forever refrain from using that expression again..I understand the underlying implications of it as an insult to all that work for the USPS.![]()
I wouldn't take it personal Cr...Fab was using the typical expression for someone going/gone crazy..we all know where it comes from, let's not pretend we don't understand it..
It would seem the local PD would’ve had some kind of presence at that event. The local PD was aware of past threats to this member of Congress.
This member - rocked the boat my friend and made some waves.
In addition, her local Tucson office was vandalized and threats made.
Did they not cut across the grain -- challenge The System -- try to take matters in their own hands ?
And to top it off someone dropped a firearm at another one of her Tucson public events. The threats were real / well documented and you would think that someone would raise a red flag.
Threats are going to happen to 'anyone' who has the balls to take a stand - especially one that cuts across the grain - that swims upstream when everyone else is swimming downstream.
unless he gets off on a nut plea bargain