The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
Ascending Wedge Implies Correction Imminent
by Carl Swenlin
August 15, 2008 The rally that began off the July lows has not demonstrated the kind of strength we normally expect from the deeply oversold conditions that were present at its beginning. Instead, the meager price advance has served only relieve oversold compression and advance internal indicators to moderately overbought levels. In the process, as the chart shows, the price pattern has morphed into an ascending wedge formation, a bearish formation that usually breaks to the downside. Since we are in a bear market (the primary trend is down), odds of the negative outcome are increased.
Bottom Line: While our trend-following model has us on an intermediate-term buy signal, my opinion is that we should expect a correction which, at the very least, will retest the July lows. Since we are in a bear market, there is also a strong possibility that any correction could be the start of the next leg down.
Question, no political bashing. What was different about how this war was managed that put us in the red financially as a country?
It was why the cost in dollars was so high. We did something on a major scale not done like this before.
I'll be back in a few to give you my theory.
U.S. likely to recapitalize Fannie, Freddie: report
Sun Aug 17, 2008 2:47pm EDT
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Treasury is growing increasingly likely to recapitalize Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the months ahead on the taxpayer's dime, Barron's reported in its August 18 edition.
The weekly financial newspaper said that such a move could wipe out existing holders of the agencies' common stock, with preferred shareholders and even holders of the two entities' $19 billion of subordinated debt also suffering losses.
An insider in the Bush administration told Barron's that Fannie and Freddie "are being jawboned" by the Treasury Department and their new regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), to raise more equity.
But government officials don't expect the agencies to succeed, Barron's reported.
If the government-sponsored enterprises fail to raise fresh capital, the administration is likely to mount its own recapitalization, with Treasury infusing taxpayer money into the agencies, according to the Barron's source.
The paper reported the infusion would take the form of a preferred stock with such seniority, dividend preference and convertibility rights that Fannie's and Freddie's existing common shares "effectively would be wiped out, and their preferred shares left bereft of dividends."
The report called an equity injection by the government a quasi-nationalization -- without having to put the agencies' liabilities on the U.S. balance sheet, and thus doubling the U.S. debt.
After accounting for deferred tax assets and generous asset marks, Fannie and Freddie each may have a negative $50 billion in asset value, and little prospect of digging themselves out of the hole, Barron's reported.
(Reporting by Ed Tobin, editing by Richard Chang)
NOW, if they do this and even though they keep it off the Counties balance sheet. Will it make the dollar weaker because they created capital to Fred and Fan out of thin air. Increasing money supply thus decreasing dollar strength. I think so.
Bud Gerber: You know what they're calling this bond drive? The Mighty Seventh. They might've called it the "We're Flat ****ing Broke And Can't Even Afford Bullets So We're Begging For Your Pennies" bond drive, but it didn't have quite the ring. They could've called it that, though, because the last four bond drives came up so short we just printed money instead. Ask any smart boy on Wall Street, he'll tell you our dollar is next to worthless, we've borrowed so much. And nobody is lending any more. Ships aren't being built, tanks aren't being built, machine guns, bazookas, hand grenades, zip. You think this is a farce? You want to go back to your buddies? Well stuff some rocks in your pockets before you get on the plane, because that's all we got left to throw at the Japanese. And don't be surprised if your plane doesn't make it off the runway, because the fuel dumps are empty. And our good friends, the Arabs, are only taking bullion. If we don't raise $14 billion, and that's million with a "B," this war is over by the end of the month. We make a deal with the Japanese, we give whatever they want and we come home, because you've seen them fight, and they sure as **** ain't giving up. $14 billion! The last three drives didn't make that much all together.
<steps on soapbox>Subcontracting of mercenaries. We subcontracted the most ever during this war in order to avoid the draft and at a premium. The draft would have been political suicide for any politician, so any and all support roles were subcontracted out in order to use active duty personnel in combat roles. We even use mercenaries to the max with Blackwater. These companies paid top dollar to anyone who wanted to make good money in a combat zone. They recruited guys right off of the line with big money offers in comparison to what a lowly E-2, E-3, or E-4 was getting from their government.
An E-3 over 3 years in service base pay is $1790 a month plus no taxes, combat, haz duty pay, and benefits. So $21,500 a year or go to work for Blackwater for $50,000 to $80,000 plus depending of training, level of experience, with benefits, and tax free. Sign me up! Plus the tax payer got shafted when they lost that veteran because of all of the training dollars spent on them.
You could of drafted 3 Privates or more for what the subcontracting of one civilian cost the taxpayer, but you would have had to draft and that is a dirty word. So there is a huge price to pay if you want to avoid a draft and that price is subcontracting mercenaries.
Nobody had the will or the balls to use the draft or get out and instead they bent to the will of the people to protect their political carers. All are guilty, all are to blame, all are trying to save their jobs and not do the right thing but do what is going to keep them in office.
The people do not always know what is best for them or the country, but they have a vote and the career politician fears the vote.
So vote.
<steps off soapbox>
<steps on soapbox>
We have an inexhaustible source of mercenaries with the will to kill already on the taxpayer dole...in our prisons and on our streets. Round em up, train em, arm em, offer them pardons or amnesties if they fight and survive, and send them over. Ever see The Dirty Dozen or The Devils Brigade?
OPEC official says output cuts may be needed
By MarketWatch
Last update: 3:09 p.m. EDT Aug. 16, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- An Iranian official in the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries said Saturday that the producers group is considering leaving oil production levels unchanged or perhaps even trimming them to shore up flagging prices and defend market share.
"The market is oversupplied by at least 1 million barrels a day. If OPEC would like to remove this additional oil out of the market, then OPEC has to cut some production," OPEC governor Mohammad Ali Khatibi told Dow Jones in a telephone interview.