Reactive1's Account Talk

Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

MBIA= specializes in municipal bond insurance.

By law, the F Fund must be invested in fixed-income securities.
The F Fund in an index fund that tracks the Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate (LBA) Index. The LBA Index consists of high quality fixed-income securities with maturities of more than one year. The index is comprised of Treasury and Agency bonds, asset-backed securities, and corporate and non-corporate bonds.

Anyhow, MBIA said that it was surprised by Moody's action in light of the rating agency's recent public statements on the Company's capital plan and last week's Aa2 rating of the Surplus Notes. MBIA reaffirms its intention to continue working towards stabilizing its Triple-A ratings from all three rating agencies and addressing Moody's remaining concerns.
http://www.mbia.com/
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

MBIA= specializes in municipal bond insurance.

By law, the F Fund must be invested in fixed-income securities.
The F Fund in an index fund that tracks the Lehman Brothers U.S. Aggregate (LBA) Index. The LBA Index consists of high quality fixed-income securities with maturities of more than one year. The index is comprised of Treasury and Agency bonds, asset-backed securities, and corporate and non-corporate bonds.

Anyhow, MBIA said that it was surprised by Moody's action in light of the rating agency's recent public statements on the Company's capital plan and last week's Aa2 rating of the Surplus Notes. MBIA reaffirms its intention to continue working towards stabilizing its Triple-A ratings from all three rating agencies and addressing Moody's remaining concerns.
http://www.mbia.com/
thats what they all say now huh....reaffirms by a company now ....uh.....
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

Holding at 100% G for Wednesday. Let's see what happens. Best of luck everyone!\\

Wednesday: 100% G
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

Well, I guess I'll just stay put. It's boring sitting in the G fund, and not even in the F, but the F scares me, although just a little. I think we'll see high volatility throughout February and an overall environment where you can't make any money outside of trading. Ultimately I think we re-test the lows down into the 1200's on the S&P.

Holding 100% G


"You cannot solve insolvency problems with liquidity."
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

Maintaining:

100% G Fund

We are still at about Oct 2006 levels in the S&P as far as I can see. I'm watching closely and hoping to jump in at the right time. The sharp reversal Friday slowed down the inevitable IMO, as if it were good news that severely troubled bond insurers might have some form of a bailout. Ok. I believe we were on the verge of complete breakdown Friday and going into this week, before this story broke, so now we have to slow down again and see how this plays out Monday and Tuesday and how it meshes with housing and other numbers due out. The market has been in a neutral/sideways consolidation mode and is within days of movement.

In the end, I'm afraid the bailout story will be old news by Tuesday, recognized for being less important than it really is and already priced in anyway, leaving the market to rely on housing numbers for any catalyst. The market is not going to skyrocket to new highs on bond insurer bailout possibilities or even a done deal. It's certainly possible to miss out on a nice psychological rally, but the exact opposite is also possible, and in this environment I believe in better safe than sorry. In a broader view, we are near the point where the market is looking beyond here and now recession/stagnation fears and toward a breakout from recessionary trends.
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

Just wait and see what happens when the crack is gone and the FED stops lowering rates and/or only goes 0.25.

CPI yr/yr was 4.5%. That is not very good. Food and energy is very important and should not be left out. From where I stand, at least in my life, I can really feel the effects of inflation.

My take is that patience will be rewarded...there will be a much lower point to start buying back in. There could be a rally in the meantime but all I see are lower highs. Wake me up at 1396!
 
Re: Reactive1 Account Talk

I sure would like to see SOMETHING happen either way! I'm getting very, very bored sitting on the sidelinezzzzzzzzz....
 
Maintaining 100% G Fund

And so the decision was made. I thought it would take a little longer. The strong downside move Friday is very bad news for the short-term, IMO, although it was inevitable anyway. Following the massive January sell-off the market consolidated and moved sideways, trended up on bad news, hit upside resistance (1390-1420 on the S&P) and was forced to make a decision. There was probably an 80% chance in this environment (bear or near-bear market conditions) that the decision would be a downward move rather than a move past 1420. It's just not time yet. What we don't know is if this is a full-blown bear market. My guess is that it is NOT, but if it is there is a long way further to drop, unfortunately. A typical recessionary bear market will shed 40% off of a major index. That means we could still see approximately 260 points (another approx. 20% in addition to the roughly 20% down from recent highs) taken off of the S&P. That would be an S&P at roughly 1070. Just that POSSIBILITY is enough to have me in super-duper capital preservation mode. I think something in-between is more likely but that still points to a continued downtrend in the near term, and we may find ourselves working with a S&P in the mid to high 1200's for some time. The F fund will probably be an option again for me after any bail-out news as it is usually the place to be when the prime-rate is falling.:cool:
 
Fed May Delay Reversal of Cuts as Payrolls Decline (Update1)

By Craig Torres
March 8 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Reserve may keep lowering interest rates, and postpone the ``rapid reversal'' of reductions that officials discussed in January, as the housing rout erodes hiring and spending.
Yesterday's employment report, showing the economy lost 85,000 jobs in the first two months of 2008, altered economists' and traders' expectations for how much the Fed will cut rates and how long it will hold them down.
Increasing signs the U.S. is in a recession, along with a further deterioration in credit markets, spurred traders to bet the Fed will cut its benchmark rate as low as 1.75 percent by June. The weakening housing and labor markets are also putting pressure on the Bush administration to do more to stem the surge in foreclosures and ease a shortage of cash in money markets.
``The economy faces considerable headwinds and rates will have to stay low,'' said Brian Sack, a senior economist at Macroeconomic Advisers LLC in Washington. ``Weakness in payroll growth, falling confidence, declining wealth, and tighter credit conditions all add up to a weak outlook.''
Macroeconomic Advisers and JPMorgan Chase & Co. analysts changed their Fed rate forecasts to a three-quarter-point cut from the present 3 percent at the March 18 meeting. They previously expected a half-point move. Banks including HSBC Holdings Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. also lowered their predictions for this year.
Response to `Crash'
``The Fed's doing what it can,'' Kenneth Rogoff, a professor at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, said in an interview in Paris. ``It's very limited what monetary policy can do in the wake of a once-in-many-decades housing- price crash.''
Fed officials themselves acknowledged the limits this week, even as they announced a new effort to inject funds into the banking system to offset a deeper credit crunch.
``We are placing too much burden on monetary policy in dealing with financial crises,'' Kansas City Fed Bank President Tom Hoenig said in a speech in Rio de Janeiro today. ``We need to place more emphasis on other macro policy options to deal with the economic consequences.''
The Treasury Department, which has opposed the use of taxpayer money to shore up the housing industry, is talking to banks, other regulators and community advocates about further steps to curb foreclosures.
`Additional Solutions'
``Conversations are confidential, but I am impressed that they are looking for additional solutions to the problem,'' said John Taylor, president and chief executive officer of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition in Washington.
Congressional Democrats have pushed the Bush administration to step up its response, proposing the use of government funds to purchase distressed mortgages. Bond traders this week speculated the government may guarantee mortgage-backed debt issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, though Treasury spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli today rejected the idea.
Fed officials also indicated that further initiatives are needed to alleviate the housing slump.
Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, 54, this week said ``more can and should be done'' by lenders to avert foreclosure. He recommended ``principal reductions that restore some equity for the homeowner.''
Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren, who researched credit crises in New England and Japan in the 1990s, said falling home prices are locking distressed borrowers out of refinancing options.
Cost of Delay
``There may be a significant cost to delaying needed actions that could restore confidence in the ratings process, the pricing of financial assets, and the impact of declining house prices,'' Rosengren said March 6.
Nationally, home prices fell 9 percent in the fourth quarter from a year earlier, the biggest decline in 20 years of record-keeping, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home-price index. Economists at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. forecast prices will decline another 10 percent.
So far, Treasury Secretary Paulson has embraced private- sector solutions such as a voluntary loan modification program. Democrats have faulted the Hope Now alliance of mortgage lenders for failing to do enough to stop record foreclosures.
``People need help now -- not just `Hope Now,''' Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, said in a statement this week. ``The administration, whose lax oversight led to this crisis, has put only a flimsy plan in place that failed to offer enough.''
`Rapid Pace
For the Fed, the deepening housing crunch means officials may need to postpone a future battle against inflation. At the Jan. 29-30 meeting, some officials considered the central bank might need to raise rates in a ``rapid reversal'' when the economy recovers, minutes of the gathering showed Feb. 20.
Chicago Fed President Charles Evans said last week that taking back rate-cut ``insurance'' can make clear that the Fed is committed to containing inflation. By contrast, New York Fed President Timothy Geithner yesterday stressed that ``monetary policy may have to remain accommodative for some time.''
``They want markets to believe rates will be low for long,'' said Bruce Kasman, chief economist at JPMorgan in New York.
To contact the reporter on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net
 
IFT for COB Monday:

100% G

Still taking next to no chances and I just don't want to be involved on Tuesday. I'm hoping of course for the perfect storm of a downer on Monday and a good F fund close and a bail on Tuesday with a small profit. I have no idea the reaction to whatever the Fed does on Tuesday but with these market conditions I find nothing worth much risk. As long as Big Ben keeps forecasting his moves like a weatherman there isn't much hope for a buy on the news rally as it's already priced in for the most part IMO. :rolleyes:
 
Hey now! I resemble that remark re: weatherman. :D


Reactive1 Statement Release 14 Mar 2008:

"There was no intent to impugn or otherwise disparage the weatherpeople who faithfully serve us, and I regret that fact that my remarks might have hurt some or relied on stereotype or innuendo."

Wow, you know I've worked for the government for too long.
 
Reactive1 Statement Release 14 Mar 2008:

"There was no intent to impugn or otherwise disparage the weatherpeople who faithfully serve us, and I regret that fact that my remarks might have hurt some or relied on stereotype or innuendo."

Wow, you know I've worked for the government for too long.

LMAO! :laugh:
 
Back
Top