Oil and natural gas drilling in U.S. waters

Oil slick may choke shipping along Gulf Coast

Sat May 1, 2010 1:08am IST

Shipping traffic in key U.S. Gulf of Mexico channels has been little affected by a giant oil spill in the region, but concerns mounted on Friday that the spill may soon choke off shipping arteries.

The Gulf of Mexico and Gulf Coast region is home to key transit routes for crude oil, refined products such as gasoline and diesel, and grains. The Mississippi River Delta includes key shipping lanes linking sea and land.

Crude from the spill, which began from a BP-operated oil field in the offshore Gulf last week after a drilling rig exploded and sank 50 miles south of the Louisiana shoreline, made landfall in the state on Friday.

Several forecasters warned the spill could affect Mississippi, Alabama and northwest Florida in coming days.
Depending on weather patterns, they said, the slick could also move westward, nearer to the country's top oil refining zone and its only offshore oil port.

Around a fourth of U.S. oil production and 15 percent of the country's natural gas production comes from offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. No production is currently affected by the oil spill, according to the U.S. Minerals Management Service, which said Friday it was in regular contact with all producers in the region.

U.S. investment bank Goldman Sachs warned its clients Friday that the slick may affect oil tanker traffic in the region starting Friday, likely cutting crude imports to the world's top consuming nation.
Goldman said the shipping lanes around the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port, which handles between 1 million and 1.5 million barrels a day of crude imports, could be affected.

LOOP, which is located off the Mississippi Delta area and west of the area affected by the spill for now, is connected by pipeline to the Gulf Coast, site of around half of U.S. refining capacity.
LOOP continued to operate normally following the spill, and did not expect any immediate impact from the oil slick.

"The heavy oil is a ways away from us. We don't expect an impact. We're operating normally, and we don't expect our offloading to be affected any time soon," LOOP's Barb Hestermann told Reuters on Friday.

U.S. refiners have yet to experience any supply disruptions, although the U.S. Coast Guard has recommended that seagoing vessels avoid the area of the oil slick, which has grown to around 100 miles wide, potentially impeding tanker traffic in days to come.

An industry source said Friday that at least one major port in the Gulf Coast region was not allowing ships that have transited through oil slick areas to dock until they have been inspected.
The State of Alabama Port Authority said on Thursday that shipping traffic could be significantly delayed in the region if ships are made to navigate through oil slick, since they would require cleaning.

Valero Energy Corp, a top U.S. refiner, said on Friday there has been no problem getting deliveries to its Gulf Coast refineries. "We're watching the situation closely," said Bill Day, Valero's spokesman. Exxon Mobil Corp, whose Gulf Coast refineries include Baytown, the nation's largest refinery at 572,000 barrels per day, also said the slick had not had any impact on its refineries in the region.

For a list of oil infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico region, click:

GRAIN TRANSPORT UNIMPEDED
No restrictions have been imposed on vessels into the Mississippi River, a key channel for grain transport, according the U.S. Coast Guard, but grain traders were closely monitoring developments.
"There are no current shipping restrictions in place but we are encouraging all mariners to monitor Channel 16 for any that may come on line in the future," said Petty Officer David Mosley of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Shipments via the Southwest Pass, the main grain shipping lane into the Mississippi River, were proceeding normally early on Friday, grain traders said.
More: http://in.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idINTRE63T4SS20100430?sp=true
 
Oil end up in the Ohio Valley? :laugh: What an idiot, water runs downhill. Check your physics. I've spent the last 25 years following the flow of the inland waterway system. But being a know it all, I'm sure you're right and. :rolleyes:

Talk about trying to build this into a panic. It'll be bad enough along the Gulf without lying about it going up river all the way to the Ohio Valley. I;ll keep an ryr out for it. :laugh:
 
anyone got some good website references to stay current on the gulf spill situations?

i've been to NOAA and see their projections i can put two and two together from there, but i'm looking for something more than shallow news stories that are more editorial content and human interest pieces than fact.

i'm looking for info on the physical conditions on the sea floor, the engineering challenges, the logistics of the massive effort. what is it going to take to gain a measure of control on this thing and slow it down a bit?
 
I sometimes get more details from UK newspapers than from our own. Here's a couple things I learned today....

If it is taken by the Gulf’s defining current, which is known as the Loop, the oil may also reach the Florida Keys and endanger the region’s coral and resident marine populations.
The type of oil leaking from the sea floor is complicating matters. It is called sweet crude, which contains heavy compounds, known as asphaltenes, that do not burn easily or evaporate, even on the warm Louisiana coast.
With light crude, both burning and chemical dispersants work well, but neither tactic is very effective against sweet crude, raising fears that nothing can be done to stop the oil reaching shore.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7112465.ece
 
anyone got some good website references to stay current on the gulf spill situations?

i've been to NOAA and see their projections i can put two and two together from there, but i'm looking for something more than shallow news stories that are more editorial content and human interest pieces than fact.

i'm looking for info on the physical conditions on the sea floor, the engineering challenges, the logistics of the massive effort. what is it going to take to gain a measure of control on this thing and slow it down a bit?

The best data right now is coming from the NOAA site, and also the Joint Response website here:

http://www.deepwaterhorizonresponse.com/go/site/2931/

The EPA is doing air monitoring as well, and air monitoring results are here:

http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/

Note that multiple government agencies are reacting and the joint website is probably as good of info you are going to be able to get for a while.

BP has nothing on their website, other than a press release saying they plan to help pay for it, and a redirect to the government web site.
Hayward added: "BP is fully committed to taking all possible steps to contain the spread of the oil spill. We are taking full responsibility for the spill and we will clean it up, and where people can present legitimate claims for damages we will honour them."

http://www.bp.com/bodycopyarticle.do?categoryId=1&contentId=7052055

Oh, and that BP page also has a note that BP reports oil profits were 135% higher in the first quarter of 2010. That release came out Wednesday last week.
 
Wall Street Journal a few minutes ago:

Interior Secretary Salazar: US Gulf Oil Spill May Be Worse Than Valdez



WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The BP PLC (BP) oil spill in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico may be worse that the 1989 ExxonMobil Corp. (XOM) Valdez spill in Alaska, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said on CNN Sunday.
"The worst-case scenario is we could have 100,000 barrels or more of oil flowing out," Salazar said on CNN's "State of the Union."
BP and the U.S. government have over the past week stuck to their raised estimate of 5,000 barrels a day spilling out of the deepwater well.
But Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano said on ABC News that the current spill rate could currently be much higher.
"Right now that could be in the tens of thousands of gallons per day, of barrels per day," she said.
Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen said their worst fear is that the well could leak at 100,000 barrels a day, if the well head breaks. Industry experts say that the well pipe appears to be crimped, curbing the potential leak rate.
Friday, industry experts said based on satellite images and standard measuring indexes, they estimate the spill rate at 20,000 barrels a day to 25,000 barrels a day. If those rates are accurate, the spill could already rival the 11-million gallon Valdez slick that economically and environmentally devastated part of Alaska.
Allen said three leaks have now been found at the well.
Asked if the 25,000 barrel a day figures were accurate, head of BP America, Lamar McKay, said on ABC that their own estimates were "very, very uncertain."
Salazar said that he believed BP could stop the leak, but he fears that it may take 90 days to do that. BP is placing a new rig over the leak and will soon attempt to use drilling tools to close the leak.
If the 25,000 barrel-a-day estimate is accurate and the leak lasts for 90 days, that's 2.25 million barrels, or 94.5 million gallons.
Besides hitting sensitive wetlands, marshlands, bird migration stops, and other wildlife, the leak is threatening major fishing and spawning areas in the Gulf. Coastal towns from Louisiana to Florida are also concerned that their beaches will be covered in oil tar, hurting their tourism industries.



Source: http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100502-702751.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines

If it's 25,000 barrels a day, that five times the estimates that were being used last week, which were five times the estimates being talked about the first week.


It's a bad, bad leak.
 
http://blog.skytruth.org/2010/05/gulf-oil-spill-new-spill-rate.htm

Dr. Ian MacDonald at FSU just produced a new spill-size estimate based on the US Coast Guard aerial overflight map of the oil slick on April 28, 2010. The bottom line: that map implies that on April 28, there was a total of 8.9 million gallons floating on the surface of the Gulf.

That implies a minimum average flow rate of slightly more than 1 million gallons of oil (26,000 barrels) per day from the leaking well on the seafloor. Since we're now in Day 11 of the spill, which began with a blowout and explosion on April 20, we estimate that by the end of the today 12.2 million gallons of oil, at a minimum, have been spilled into the Gulf of Mexico.

The oft-quoted official estimate for the Exxon Valdez spill is 11 million gallons, although some think that is the lower limit of the likely range. It appears that we've just set a very sad new record.
 
Don't worry Coolhand.

Buster promised us it would never make it to Key West.;)

Nice animation there Coolhand. Great find.

Yep-- that's "the loop" would could take it down the west coast of Florida, past Key West, and then up the other side of Florida. With tar balls and gunk for a long, long time.

Let's all hope they can find a way to choke it off soon.
 
I'm waiting for the conspiracy theorists to say the President did it.....
Yer right, there everywhere but some sites are blocked?:confused:
SO Who blew up the Louisana Oil Rig?
A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today written by Russia’s Northern Fleet is reporting that the United States has ordered a complete media blackout over North Korea’s torpedoing of the giant Deepwater Horizon oil platform owned by the World’s largest offshore drilling contractor Transocean that was built and financed by South Korea’s Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd., that has caused great loss of life, untold billions in economic damage to the South Korean economy, and an environmental catastrophe to the United States.
Most important to understand about this latest attack by North Korea against its South Korean enemy is that under the existing “laws of war” it was a permissible action as they remain in a state of war against each other due to South Korea’s refusal to sign the 1953 Armistice ending the Korean War.
To the attack itself, these reports continue, the North Korean “cargo vessel” Dai Hong Dan believed to be staffed by 17th Sniper Corps “suicide” troops left Cuba’s Empresa Terminales Mambisas de La Habana (Port of Havana) on April 18th whereupon it “severely deviated” from its intended course for Venezuela’s Puerto Cabello bringing it to within 209 kilometers (130 miles) of the Deepwater Horizon oil platform which was located 80 kilometers (50 miles) off the coast of the US State of Louisiana where it launched an SSC Sang-o Class Mini Submarine (Yugo class) estimated to have an operational range of 321 kilometers (200 miles).
On the night of April 20th the North Korean Mini Submarine manned by these “suicidal” 17th Sniper Corps soldiers attacked the Deepwater Horizon with what are believed to be 2 incendiary torpedoes causing a massive explosion and resulting in 11 workers on this giant oil rig being killed outright. Barely 48 hours later, on April 22nd , this North Korean Mini Submarine committed its final atrocity by exploding itself directly beneath the Deepwater Horizon causing this $1 Billion oil rig to sink beneath the seas and marking 2010’s celebration of Earth Day with one of the largest environmental catastrophes our World has ever seen. [more]
http://www.snooperreport.com/snoope...p-the-louisiana-oil-rig-nuke-north-korea.html
 
FYI- It appears "Eutimes.net" is owned by a neo-nazi guy out of South Carolina, and routed through an anonymous server located in Toronto, Canada.
 
FYI-
I got a spyware warning from my anti-virus program on that one.
Caution-

I had to manually shut down my computer because I couldn't get the pop-up to shut up & let me get out.....

And my pop-up-stopper was in effect, shining its bright orange lights at me..
"do you want.... "
 
Back
Top