-
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
-
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
-
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
-
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
mlk_man's account talk
- Thread starter tsptalk
- Start date
- Status
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
Tom,
Manymiss Mlk_Man's contributions. You should have deleted M_M's one post like the so many offensive crude posts of MT's that you deleted. I agree with Mike's comments about MT - just says what he does after the fact. At least M_M had many faithful richer followers, no? Did MT really mean that he's going tostay in until the 3rd week of Jan.? Ever consider asking him back and let the members keep him in tow?
Tom,
Manymiss Mlk_Man's contributions. You should have deleted M_M's one post like the so many offensive crude posts of MT's that you deleted. I agree with Mike's comments about MT - just says what he does after the fact. At least M_M had many faithful richer followers, no? Did MT really mean that he's going tostay in until the 3rd week of Jan.? Ever consider asking him back and let the members keep him in tow?
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
Tom I did not know you were Wonder Things father.
DADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!! WHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Tom I did not know you were Wonder Things father.
DADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!!! WHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
THANK YOU! I felt the same way when I read her post too. Why should I get blamed for Mike e-mailing Tom with negative comments and threats??
It is Tom's board if he wants to ban something that is his call. Tom stated the reason why and he should not be questioned by others why. Also other members should try to harm another member by using comments like "he made crude remark comments also"...when that member has placed crude comments on this board also.
The mostimportant reason Mike was not banned for the crude remarks but something else that Tom stated clearly in a post. If someone is going todump on someone else for something they have done themselves is like saying "YOU SHOULD BANNED ME ALSO" because I am putting a finger at someone else for doing something that I have been doing too.:^ But that would mean taking responsibilites for their own actions...
Daddddddddddd Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Thank for the back up!!!
THANK YOU! I felt the same way when I read her post too. Why should I get blamed for Mike e-mailing Tom with negative comments and threats??
It is Tom's board if he wants to ban something that is his call. Tom stated the reason why and he should not be questioned by others why. Also other members should try to harm another member by using comments like "he made crude remark comments also"...when that member has placed crude comments on this board also.
The mostimportant reason Mike was not banned for the crude remarks but something else that Tom stated clearly in a post. If someone is going todump on someone else for something they have done themselves is like saying "YOU SHOULD BANNED ME ALSO" because I am putting a finger at someone else for doing something that I have been doing too.:^ But that would mean taking responsibilites for their own actions...
Daddddddddddd Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Thank for the back up!!!
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
grandma wrote:
Mike was not banned for crude comments. So the finger pointing my way by a member that does the same thing I took expection too and had to comment on. Ban him because he does the same thing? Before someone points their fingers at me they better get their facts straight.
Calling for Daddy after Daddy made up his mind........whaaaaaaaaaaa.
grandma wrote:
Questioning Tom why he banned someone is unnessary, irrelevant and antagonistic. IT IS HIS board we are guests here.
Mike was not banned for crude comments. So the finger pointing my way by a member that does the same thing I took expection too and had to comment on. Ban him because he does the same thing? Before someone points their fingers at me they better get their facts straight.
Calling for Daddy after Daddy made up his mind........whaaaaaaaaaaa.
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
Yes we can.
(1) Do not question Tom for who he allows on HIS board.
(2) Do not point the finger at other members for things that they themselves do.
Then we can get along just fine here.
This is a buying opportunity.
Last month when I said the market was toppy and we have a double top...I was stupid one. This stupid one is not down big
this grand New Year!
Rally market rally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes we can.
(1) Do not question Tom for who he allows on HIS board.
(2) Do not point the finger at other members for things that they themselves do.
Then we can get along just fine here.
This is a buying opportunity.
Last month when I said the market was toppy and we have a double top...I was stupid one. This stupid one is not down big
this grand New Year!Rally market rally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
grandma wrote:
grandma wrote:
Grandma, one can only assist those who recognize a need.
lookywhatigot@yahoo.com
New member
imported post
He definitely has a lot of views on his account. Was he that good? Maybe another poll is in order if so. It's all about the money after all. I've been reading a bunch of past posts. God lord there are a lot them! I don't really see anything that he said bad about anyone but markettimer.
He definitely has a lot of views on his account. Was he that good? Maybe another poll is in order if so. It's all about the money after all. I've been reading a bunch of past posts. God lord there are a lot them! I don't really see anything that he said bad about anyone but markettimer.
G
Guest
Guest
imported post
lookywhatigot wrote:
Guess you may have some brain matter there, huh?
But ADM seems really too peeved to take note.
lookywhatigot wrote:
Hey that's a good idea - I didn't think of that. I was wondering what "you had"
Guess you may have some brain matter there, huh?But ADM seems really too peeved to take note.
grandma
Well-known member
imported post
lookywhatigot wrote:
Just a comment - or two here: Rules are rules in order to keep order, in order to keep us focused on making the money. If the members aren't able to convey `cool it' to each other successfuly, then the Owner of the vineyard has to step in, drastic measures. And, not many would believe the owner of a free site should be chastised for a decision hefelt he was forced to make, not to say there was 100% agreement w/the decision, and there wereconcerned questions at that time.But time spent in `border control' is time lost on anyalsis, etc for the rest of the membership.
INever Did get through all those posts - they startmonths ago...are in every topic, and that was just the ones that didn't get thrown out, ones that were none of the rest of us'es (?) business. Those that were there then could follow the tracks, but those of us who came much later - forget it!!
MT wasn't able to resist adding anunnecessary line to a recent post So, imho, this is between Tom and m_m. I believe a poll would simply divert & divert. And Tom has read every post there has been ....
lookywhatigot wrote:
Lookywhatigot, a belated welcome to tsptalk. Your participation is appreciated!!
Just a comment - or two here: Rules are rules in order to keep order, in order to keep us focused on making the money. If the members aren't able to convey `cool it' to each other successfuly, then the Owner of the vineyard has to step in, drastic measures. And, not many would believe the owner of a free site should be chastised for a decision hefelt he was forced to make, not to say there was 100% agreement w/the decision, and there wereconcerned questions at that time.But time spent in `border control' is time lost on anyalsis, etc for the rest of the membership.
INever Did get through all those posts - they startmonths ago...are in every topic, and that was just the ones that didn't get thrown out, ones that were none of the rest of us'es (?) business. Those that were there then could follow the tracks, but those of us who came much later - forget it!!
MT wasn't able to resist adding anunnecessary line to a recent post So, imho, this is between Tom and m_m. I believe a poll would simply divert & divert. And Tom has read every post there has been ....
imported post
Hey folks -
I really don't want to rehash this again. I'll just say there was more going on than what we saw on the board. I had people leave because of the constant bickering. The ego got in the way too often and I gave plenty of warnings.I got tired of babysitting.
I'm going to close this thread so we can get back to the market.
Hey folks -
I really don't want to rehash this again. I'll just say there was more going on than what we saw on the board. I had people leave because of the constant bickering. The ego got in the way too often and I gave plenty of warnings.I got tired of babysitting.
I'm going to close this thread so we can get back to the market.
mlk_man
Banned
imported post
Howdy folks! Miss me? I'm back from "vacation" and ready to make some money. Are you? :^
I'm currently 100% I.
Hey fundsurfer, should we start me a new tracker or what? mlk3?
Good luck all,
M_M
PS- Thanks Tom, good to be back where it all started................:shock:
Howdy folks! Miss me? I'm back from "vacation" and ready to make some money. Are you? :^
I'm currently 100% I.
Hey fundsurfer, should we start me a new tracker or what? mlk3?
Good luck all,
M_M
PS- Thanks Tom, good to be back where it all started................:shock:
- Status
