http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/economic-calendar/
Besides the three Fed speeches, Paulson spoke in South Africa and deputy/assistant sec of the Treasury was just on CNBC and even GW's been chiming in here and there. It is a full court press on their talking points -
1) The Economy is strong and growing,
2) The dollar is undervalued (there not quite using that term but that's what they mean) and the US Policy on the dollar is strong.
3) The subprime problem will continue, but we will get through the resets and move on.
4) The problems with 1) and 2) are primarily related to 3).
Now, we know 1) is somewhat true but there is definitely evidence that the economy is contracting and growth is slowing. Point 2) is indictive that further rate cuts may not be forthcoming and Finally 3) seems reasonably true.
Point 4) hmmmm.....I got real heartburn with that one, (in part it is true)- a lot of the dollar weakenss is stemming from excessive spending and high oil. Oil is high because of the war. Spending is high because of the war. Fixing the subprime problem won't fix the dollar although it will help.
So what's the blue team view (the government) - no breaking of the 5 year bull channel, a strengthing dollar, a moderating economy with future expansion.
Now, the red team (business) gets a vote. - and they been stumpin' pretty hard, and winning thus far. Will they sit in their fox hole over the next few days, or will they execute a counterstrike? All this fuss from the blue team reiterates what we expect to see in the FOMC minutes - so the minutes are no longer relevant to the blue teams campaign - they are on stand-to and will remain on the defensive and it certainly does not sound like they are thinking about an emergency rate cut. If the red team wants to win this fight - they need to strike hard but they can also bide their time (because the minutes are irrelevant). Blue team can not achieve victory, they only fight to prevent from losing.
game on.