The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
burns the exhaust valves
What does it do to an engine if you run it too lean? View attachment 9585
This is a test:
View attachment 9584
Edit: should have been "approx 10mpg more at a leaner a/f."
why can't we edit our orginal posts?
your lack of knowledge of how an internal combustion engine works is disturbing when it comes to air/fuel ratios and fuels when u promote ethanol. do your research and prove me wrong.
A vehicle going down the hwy under lite load does not need 14.7:1, it is wasting fuel. every car could be getting approx 10mpg at a leaner a/f. however the cat will not work correctly. do your research and prove me wrong.
my mistake it was CARB of ca, however they're in bed with the epa.
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-30/business/fi-1539_1_nitrogen-oxide
your lack of knowledge of how an internal combustion engine works is disturbing when it comes to air/fuel ratios and fuels when u promote ethanol. do your research and prove me wrong.
A vehicle going down the hwy under lite load does not need 14.7:1, it is wasting fuel. every car could be getting approx 10mpg at a leaner a/f. however the cat will not work correctly. do your research and prove me wrong.
my mistake it was CARB of ca, however they're in bed with the epa.
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-08-30/business/fi-1539_1_nitrogen-oxide
Bunk-
The EPA does not require a air/fuel mixture of 14.7 to 1 for gasoline to burn. The laws of physics do.
and as for your statement of "Honda actually made a car that was using about 25-27:1 ratio but its was banned from being used in calf and NY due to the epa. "
What evidence can you provide to support such a statement?
By the way- the EPA doesn't set state-by-state emissions standards.
I call bunk on the whole post.
The marxist EPA requires that vehicles with catalytic converters run way too rich 14.7:1 at hwy speeds so that the CC will work. With todays electronics a vehicle could get at least 10 mpg more if the manufactures weren't held to 14.7:1. Honda actually made a car that was using about 25-27:1 ratio but its was banned from being used in calf and NY due to the epa. So of course I think they stopped production in the US. This actually was very very clean burning but didn't meet the 14.7:1.
The epa and osha have destroyed this country and our jobs.
...Just expressing a little trivia here about Carbon Monoxide (CO).
CO is a result of too much fuel and not enough oxygen (O2) in the combustion process for a complete fuel burn, so some fuel is left unburnt...What is done in fuel oil and coal furnaces, is to meter the oxygen (O2) in at such an excessive level that there is always an excess of unburned (in lay-terms) O2...This combines with the carbon residue from the completely burnt fuel and makes CO2 (Carbon-Dioxide) which is safe for the environment (contrary to Algorites thinking)...So, if internal combustion engines could be tuned to run on more air to fuel ratio..the emissions would be mostly CO2, but they can't yet under current technology..The Catalytic Converters was implemented on Cars and trucks for afterburning (the catalytic process)the CO to produce some hydrogen sulfide and water..
...Just expressing a little trivia here about Carbon Monoxide (CO).If Carbon Monoxide is what we're looking for why don't they catch all of it that is put out by cars, trucks, coal fired electrical plants !
I think there's a bacteria bug for that!
With Moore's Law I suspect the Large Hadron Collider can be reduced in size in 25 years to fit in that Intergalactic HoverRound I'll need to get back and forth on the habitable retirement colony on Venus!
Blairstown plant turns trash into ethanol