coolhand's Account Talk

Hey Coolhand,
I very much enjoy reading your posts!. I tried the TradersTalk link provided and the latest post is from Nov 26, '08 (however - the charts given are showing current dates (2 Mar 2009).
What am I missing? Need to register (no "lurking" allowed?) - or are you just following the charts? :o
VR

The charts are updated in current time. If you follow the thread down a little, you'll find that Don (IYB) has posted some rules to follow on how to interpret the signals. This tread was posted a few months ago, so the dates you see might confuse you, but the charts themselves stay current. If you look at the charts you'll see the latest date is Friday, 6 March 2009.
 
The charts are updated in current time. If you follow the thread down a little, you'll find that Don (IYB) has posted some rules to follow on how to interpret the signals. This tread was posted a few months ago, so the dates you see might confuse you, but the charts themselves stay current. If you look at the charts you'll see the latest date is Friday, 6 March 2009.
Sorry Coolhand,
I did note the chart dates 6 Mar 2009/up-to-date (my error-typing).
Appreciate your confirmation though!
VR :)
 
Complete opposite view from Buffet on CNBC this morning. Celente is getting attention by dire predictions. Buffet extolled the value of America - its business system and freedom - and was confident of better days ahead.
 
A Candid Assessment
Last Update: 09-Mar-09 08:43 ET

http://www.briefing.com/GeneralCont...me=Investor&ArticleId=NS20090309084337PageOne

The stock market avoided an ugly end to an ugly week last week, yet the futures market this morning doesn't connote any shift in sentiment.

As of this posting, the S&P futures are approximately 6 points below fair value, which suggests a down open of about 0.8% for the market when trading begins.

The negative leaning fits with the market trend, but it is noteworthy nonetheless considering Merck (MRK) announced a $41 billion cash and stock deal to acquire fellow drug maker Schering-Plough (SGP). The offer translates to $23.61 per share for SGP shareholders, based on Friday's closing price.

The Merck offer follows on the heels of Pfizer's (PFE) agreement to acquire Wyeth (WYE) in a $68 billion deal, making it clear the pharmaceutical industry is one area that has both the means and the drive to consolidate. One offsetting factor is that it is a necessity for some given the generic competition and the lack of potential blockbuster drugs in late-stage development to replace some aging drug stars.

In any event, the market has not been moved by this major deal like it would have been a few years ago. The muted response speaks to the festering concerns about the economy and the notion that it won't be a quick recovery.

Word that Lloyds Banking Group in the U.K. has ceded majority control to the British government in exchange for tapping into an asset guarantee program, reports the World Bank is projecting the global economy will contract for the first time since World War II, and that the U.S. will press for more government spending around the globe at the G20 summit on April 2 are all feeding the economic concerns.

Separately, Warren Buffett is giving an extended interview on CNBC this morning. He is doing what he can to allay people's long-term concerns about U.S. prospects, although he isn't necessarily pounding the table on the short-term recovery potential.

Buffett's perspective is as candid as ever. Unfortunately, earnings drive the stock market, not candor.
If it were the other way around, we might be in store for a much higher open today. Alas, we are not.
 
Just to be clear, while I am bearish long term, we are due for an intermediate term move higher. When that will happen, I don't know. I am flat in my TSP account, but long TNA at the moment.

Whatever I post is for generally consumption. I have been leaning decidedly bearish lately, but then that's where the market's been for quite some time.

I have no wish to see our economy driven into the dirt, but I'm not seeing anything to make me think otherwise. The past is history, what we do moving forward will determine our future. Market forces are in turmoil right now, and our administration needs to address concerns from "all" people, not simply some segment.
 
Buffet's interview will be repeated at 8pm EDT tonight. He has consistently tried to fulfill the role of positive and patriotic while our leaders squable. This morning he said we were hours from a financial collapse last year (as we know) and while being positive about the future now, repeatedly said that our leaders need to stop squabling and trying to accomplish many things and instead make the economy jobs 1,2 and 3. That seemed to be a slight chink in his positiveness. He might have some reservations on that future. I wonder what effect the Prez address this morning will have.
 
Buffet's interview will be repeated at 8pm EDT tonight. He has consistently tried to fulfill the role of positive and patriotic while our leaders squable. This morning he said we were hours from a financial collapse last year (as we know) and while being positive about the future now, repeatedly said that our leaders need to stop squabling and trying to accomplish many things and instead make the economy jobs 1,2 and 3. That seemed to be a slight chink in his positiveness. He might have some reservations on that future. I wonder what effect the Prez address this morning will have.

Very hard to take anything Buffet has to say without a grain of salt. He was trotted out there for a reason. If anything, his words have the potential to hurt, not help the market. So far the market has been moving sideways today so it looks like his words were met with apathy.
 
Experts like Buffet are experts until they are wrong and even they don't know it when it is coming.

I keep thinking GE at $22 a share.
 
I don't think Buffet gives a hoot about the effect of his words on the market's behavior. I think he wants to reassure the common folk about the long term and urge leaders to grow up. I could be seeing something that isn't in him, but I've been taking him to be worried about his nation and seeing no real leader talking up the future.
 
This market is acting very strange. Still no sign of selling letting up. Futures are up this morning, but it could be another set-up for a sell-off.
 
Measuring Arbitrage in Milliseconds
Rob Curran reports:

http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2009/03/09/measuring-arbitrage-in-milliseconds/

You don’t need a crystal ball or a tipoff if your computer connections are fast enough.

Some hedge funds are using a trading strategy called “latency arbitrage” to take advantage of differences in the speed of price quotations at U.S. exchanges and dark pools — a practice that reminds some investors of past abuses such as mutual-fund market timing.

“High frequency” quantitative hedge funds at firms such as Citadel Group, D.E. Shaw Group and Renaissance Technologies have direct feeds to U.S. exchanges. These feeds cut the delay on quotes down to milliseconds. During the last two years, many funds have paid for “proximity hosting,” the installation of their servers in the same data centers as the exchanges, to shave more “microseconds,” or millionths of a second, off that latency.

Latency, in electronic trading, is the amount of time a quote or an order spends in the ether, and it’s where many funds are eyeing an edge.

“The fastest one wins,” said a technology officer at a major hedge fund who was sounding out exchanges with an eye to setting up a latency-arbitrage strategy. He said the first step is to maximize the speed of market-data software and exchange connections, and the second is to find the “golden egg” - a venue or counterparty whose information is slower. The only risk, he said, was that “everybody’s getting faster.”

Now that software can trade in and out of stocks at light speed, a fund can exploit lags of milliseconds between different exchanges. Until the Securities and Exchange Commission clamped down on “SOES bandits,” small-time traders and firms were making thousands of dollars a day on lags of a few seconds between exchanges in the late 1990s.

Institutional traders now may be making millions by being a few milliseconds ahead, and some believe the SEC should clamp down again. In one form of latency arbitrage, funds can synthesize quotes from all exchanges and simulate the “National Best Bid and Offer.” The SEC expects brokers to use the NBBO - the highest bid and lowest offer on a given stock across all exchanges - as a price guideline and requires them to have it available to clients.

Exchanges disseminate continuous updates of the NBBO on stocks in separate feeds to the price quotations. Many dark pools, the anonymous stock-trading electronic venues that don’t publish bids and offers, price stocks at the midpoint of the NBBO because they want to give clients some benchmark for their pricing. The delay between the appearance of bids and offers on the direct feeds and the processing of the NBBO at dark pools presents arbitrage opportunities.

If a fund’s computers are fast enough, they can estimate where the midpoint of the NBBO will be fractions of a second faster than dark pools, which allows them to know where the price is going in that pool.

Many quantitative funds, which rely on computer models for trading, have the ability to get in and out of large stock positions in milliseconds, which means buying a stock at current prices at an exchange and selling it in a dark pool after an uptick you know is coming is a cinch.

“You have tomorrow’s newspaper today,” said Richard Gates, a portfolio manager for TFS Market Neutral fund in West Chester, Pa., who looked into a latency-arbitrage strategy after a broker outlined the success other funds had with it. “You’re looking at stale prices. Those are the types of investment strategies that arbitrageurs and hedge-fund managers drool over.”

But Mr. Gates compares latency arbitrage to “mutual fund market timing,” a practice banned in 2003 in which some traders were given tipoffs as to where prices were going.

Regulators acknowledge exchanges transmit quotes through direct feeds more quickly than through the NBBO tape but don’t believe the lag is significant enough for major arbitrage opportunities. One regulator said any “simulated” NBBO would always be a rough estimate because all exchanges disseminate their quotes at slightly different speeds.

In an e-mail seen by Dow Jones, a dark-pool operator estimated the NBBO feed it uses to price stocks was delayed 10 to 15 milliseconds - enough time for a fund to estimate the NBBO using its own feeds and place an order.

Redline Trading Solutions, a financial software firm, claims one of its products can consolidate quotes from direct feeds in a way that sounds like a simulated national best-bid and offer in “single-digit” microseconds.

For the scale of Mr. Gates’ fund, direct feeds to the exchanges proved cost prohibitive. But for larger funds, Mr. Gates said it would be foolish not to engage in latency arbitrage. And he said dark pools, whose profitability is linked to their volumes, may be tempted to turn a blind eye to the activity as long as other clients don’t complain.
 
Fresh pessimism sweeps over credit sector
By Michael Mackenzie and Aline van Duyn in New York

Published: March 9 2009 19:46 | Last updated: March 9 2009 19:46

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bbaa8a16-0cda-11de-a555-0000779fd2ac.html

Credit market indicators – barometers of stress since the financial crisis began 18 months ago – are once more flashing red.

Heightened concern over the fate of US carmakers and worries about escalating losses at banks and financial institutions and at General Electric, the largest debt issuer in capital markets, are creating a grim mood.

“There has been a strong repricing of credit risk as there is a panic almost about the financial sector,” Brian Yelvington, strategist at Creditsights, says.

“So far, most of the pain of the problems at financial institutions is being taken by shareholders and taxpayers, but there are real concerns that the problems will be so large that the pain will shift to holders of bonds and other securities.”

Debt from financial institutions – including some of the biggest banks such as Citigroup and Bank of America – is widely held by investors ranging from pension funds to insurance companies.

Concerns about the value of these holdings have pushed risk premiums higher across the board.

“We are in another round of the credit crunch where the intensity is spreading,” Mary Miller, director of fixed income at T. Rowe Price, says.

“There is a lot of government support still to come, but the details are uncertain.

“This uncertainty is worrying investors, because they do not know if they will or will not be included in the government support.”

In the credit sphere, high yield debt has been hit hardest as companies at risk of bankruptcy are punished.

Delicate balance of bonds, equities and derivatives:

The rise in the cost of default protection for General Electric Capital highlights how tightly credit derivatives are linked to equities and bonds, writes Nicole Bullock in New York.

Credit default swaps on the financing arm of General Electric last week jumped to distressed levels. GECC CDS implies a rating 14 notches below its triple A, says Moody’s Capital Markets Research.

General Electric stock collapsed on fears that the top rating was in jeopardy. That raises the threat of collateral calls on GECC’s financial contracts – a scenario that crushed AIG.

“The basic idea is that as the equity price falls, then the asset value of the firm drops below the value of the liabilities and boom: bankruptcy,” says Tim Backshall, chief strategist at Credit Derivatives Research.

Mr Backshall says it is unclear which market led the moves.

“Over the past six months, equity has actually been the leader of weakness in the capital structure,” he says.

Adding to the pressure, ratings concerns led to hedging of collateralised debt obligations, whose top tranches are full of GECC bonds.

At higher prices, CDS become an uneconomical hedge, forcing dealers to sell equity or buy puts, closing the negative feedback loop.
Fund data for the week ending last Wednesday show that US investors pulled $911m from high yield bond funds, making it their worst week since early in the fourth quarter of 2008, according to EPFR Global.

The high yield credit derivative index for US companies set a series of record wides last week, driven by worries over carmakers and a forecast by Moody’s Investors Service of a 14 per cent default rate by the fourth quarter.

The Markit iTraxx Crossover index of mostly sub-investment grade European credits hit a record wide of 1,170 basis points.

US high yield debt has slipped 3.3 per cent so far this month, reversing early gains for the year, according to Barclays Capital.

High yield in Europe has fallen 5.1 per cent in March, reducing its gain for the year to 3.5 per cent.

Not even investment grade is escaping the selling pressure. The US CDX index – which tracks 125 investment grade credits – is trading at a risk premium of 250 basis points over US Treasuries, its widest level since last December.

This comes at a time when some investors have shunned equities and plumped for high grade credit exposure. The moves in credit come, however, as equity values continue to tumble.

The deteriorating mood follows the Federal Reserve’s unveiling of a credit facility designed to restore securitised borrowing for credit cards, car and student loans.

The inability of the Fed’s term asset-backed securities loan facility to boost confidence in banks and for asset-backed securities is adding to pressure on financials and credit markets.

“The Fed’s delayed but still quite welcome debut of the initial version of the Talf programme to try to restart consumer ABS markets elicited almost no reaction from investors, a seemingly unduly pessimistic attitude about the potential for this programme to help unclog bank balance sheets,” Ted Wieseman, economist at Morgan Stanley, says.

In spite of the Fed’s various liquidity programmnes, the money market’s benchmark rate, the three-month dollar London Interbank Offered Rate, has been rising.

Libor set a low of 1.08 per cent in mid-January and has been creeping up. The move gathered pace last week, when Libor rose 5 basis points to 1.31 per cent.

The upward pressure comes amid uncertainty about the banking system, with government “stress tests” looming in April and banks having to contribute more money to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

The end of March also marks the conclusion of the first quarter, with banks facing further writedowns from deteriorating credit and mortgage exposure.

Forward measures of Libor show the market expects no alleviation in stresses in 2009.

“This key gauge of bank balance sheet pressures is thus showing that investors see no prospect for improvement this year, a very pessimistic outlook for any medium-term easing in the credit crunch,” Mr Wieseman says.

The renewed pressure in Libor is weighing on interest rate swap spreads, which reflect the credit quality of banks in the inter-dealer derivatives market.

The two-year swap spread is back above 80 basis points, its widest level over the two-year Treasury yield since mid-December.
 
Coolhand,

I am waiting in the capital preservation mode until a better signals appear. I like your seven sentinels, as well as the analysis contributed yesterday by Uptrend. If I miss some gains that's fine with me. There sure is a lot of uncertainty. Best wishes!
 
Staying cash until this upward move is confirmed with a SS buy signal. Rallies have been sold quickly when they've occured, and it's too early to tell whether this time will be different.
 
SS buy signal almost certain.

By extrapolation 6 of 7 are definitely on buy side based on current numbers, and I think it's a better than 90% probability that the 7th, BPCOMPQ has crossed over, too.
 
Back
Top