coolhand's Account Talk

Spain Faces EU Call for Deeper Deficit Cuts in Euro Rules Test

Spain Faces EU Call for Deeper Deficit Cuts in Euro Rules Test - Bloomberg

Euro Finance Chiefs Give Political Backing to $170 Billion Greek Aid Plan

Euro Finance Chiefs Sign Off on Greek Aid as EFSF Prepares to Deploy Funds - Bloomberg

Obama's Approval Rating Is Now In Total Freefall

CBS Poll: Obama Approval Rating Down To 41%

Fed To Take Propaganda To The Schoolroom: Will Teach Grade 8-12 Students About Constitutionality Of... The Fed

Fed To Take Propaganda To The Schoolroom: Will Teach Grade 8-12 Students About Constitutionality Of... The Fed | ZeroHedge

Sentiment in Homebuilders ‘Gone Wild’, Pros Say Steer Clear

News Headlines

Fed Unveils Doomsday Scenario for Banks

News Headlines

Greece should exit the euro, says Treasury Select Committee chairman Andrew Tyrie

Greece should exit the euro, says Treasury Select Committee chairman Andrew Tyrie - Telegraph
 
Merkel Says Europe Is ‘Good Way’ Up Mountain, Not Over It

Merkel Says Europe Is

Stress Tests Show How Fed Pushed Banks to Bolster Balance Sheets

Stress Tests Show How Fed Pushed Banks to Bolster Balance Sheets - Bloomberg

Apple Drives Record $1.24 Trillion of Company Cash, Moody’s Says

Apple Drives Record $1.24 Trillion of Company Cash, Moody

Obama's Big Health-Care Reform Is Going To Cost Double What He Said

Obamacare Is Going To Cost Double What Obama Said

CBO: Deficit estimate for 2012 hiked to $1.2T after payroll tax cut, jobless benefits

CBO: Deficit estimate for 2012 hiked to $1.2T after payroll tax cut, jobless benefits - The Washington Post

Getting to grips with the EU's new fiscal pact

Getting to grips with the EU's new fiscal pact - Telegraph
 
Stress Tests Pass Fed’s Flim-Flam Standard: Jonathan Weil

Stress Tests Pass Fed

Unions Send Doctor Bills to Taxpayers: Steven Greenhut

Unions Send Doctor Bills to Taxpayers: Steven Greenhut - Bloomberg

Young Americans Are Refusing To Fly The Coop

Young Americans Are Refusing To Move

WALL STREET'S WORST NIGHTMARE: The 'Millionaire Madam' Is Getting Ready To Make A Deal

WALL STREET'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Millionaire Madam Says She's Ready To Make A Deal

Terminated CBO Whistleblower Shares Her Full Story With Zero Hedge, Exposes Deep Conflicts At "Impartial" Budget Office

Terminated CBO Whistleblower Shares Her Full Story With Zero Hedge, Exposes Deep Conflicts At "Impartial" Budget Office | ZeroHedge

Scarce Oil? U.S. Has 60 Times More Than Obama Claims

The Myth Of Scarce Oil

Glenn Beck Closes In On The $100 Million Mark

Glenn Beck Closes In On The $100 Million Mark - Forbes

Poetic justice and Obama's $2t health care law

Poetic justice and Obama's $2t health care law | Washington Examiner
 
Unions Send Doctor Bills to Taxpayers: Steven Greenhut

Unions Send Doctor Bills to Taxpayers: Steven Greenhut - Bloomberg

Figures this
censored.gif
would happen... or better, continue to happen.



Young Americans Are Refusing To Fly The Coop

Young Americans Are Refusing To Move

That's the parent's fault, not the kids' or the economy.
argue.gif




WALL STREET'S WORST NIGHTMARE: The 'Millionaire Madam' Is Getting Ready To Make A Deal

WALL STREET'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Millionaire Madam Says She's Ready To Make A Deal

Well, at least they might be able to get something to stick to these wall street scam artists... maybe
grumble.gif




Terminated CBO Whistleblower Shares Her Full Story With Zero Hedge, Exposes Deep Conflicts At "Impartial" Budget Office

Terminated CBO Whistleblower Shares Her Full Story With Zero Hedge, Exposes Deep Conflicts At "Impartial" Budget Office | ZeroHedge

Just goes to show you, never go against the wall street fat cats...
banghead.gif




Scarce Oil? U.S. Has 60 Times More Than Obama Claims

The Myth Of Scarce Oil

 
Scarce Oil? U.S. Has 60 Times More Than Obama Claims

The Myth Of Scarce Oil

CH, nothing personal, but this is one of those articles I gotta comment on. Let's really look at this. Where is the "myth"? If you pay attention to the numbers, the "myth" is that unproven resources will have any real effect on current prices.

As such, I must repeat this pertinent quote, on page 2 near the end of the article.
"To be sure, energy companies couldn't profitably recover all this oil — even at today's prices — and what they could wouldn't make it to market for years:"
There's a harsh dose of reality. Now who's
perpetuating a "myth". They go on to cite the main problem as being lack of access to lands in AK and the Outer Continental Shelf based, respectively, on policy decisions in 1980 and 1982...nevermind the fact that the other resources cited could be drilled IF it were economically feasible to do so.

OK, to the numbers. From the chart published w/ this article
0.6% of the oil is "proved" reserves. only 0.6%!! of the number they are using...I honestly could be done with my thesis right here!
11.35% is "technically recoverable" in their words
22.7% is oil shale...controversial (even in a dyed in wool, free market, pro resource extraction red state like Utah), my words. And often too expensive to be economical...see Green River formation.
65.3% is "undiscovered resources" in their words.

Finally, with the numbers provided, anyway you do the math, I can't figure where the "60 times" number comes from.

The "myth", to me, is thinking we can base an energy policy on "technically recoverable", "undiscovered resources" and using potentially too expensive and controversial technology. Should these resources play a role, ABSOLUTELY, but it should not be the primary feature. The boom in ND shows domestic oil currently is considered important in current energy policy.

Will increasing drilling will actually reduce prices? During the current boom with unexpectedly high production ND, it hasn't happened. So yet again, we get this shocking faith in industry scientists, with a verifiable interest in profiteering, from the people who dismiss word of the overwhelming majority of independent academic scientists on such issues as climate change. It just isn't reconcilable to me.
 
Last edited:
CH, nothing personal, but this is one of those articles I gotta comment on. Let's really look at this. Where is the "myth"? If you pay attention to the numbers, the "myth" is that unproven resources will have any real effect on current prices.

As such, I must repeat this pertinent quote, on page 2 near the end of the article.
"To be sure, energy companies couldn't profitably recover all this oil — even at today's prices — and what they could wouldn't make it to market for years:"
There's a harsh dose of reality. Now who's
perpetuating a "myth". They go on to cite the main problem as being lack of access to lands in AK and the Outer Continental Shelf based, respectively, on policy decisions in 1980 and 1982...nevermind the fact that the other resources cited could be drilled IF it were economically feasible to do so.

OK, to the numbers. From the chart published w/ this article
0.6% of the oil is "proved" reserves
11.35% is "technically recoverable" in their words
22.7% is oil shale...controversial (even in a dyed in wool, free market, pro resource extraction red state like Utah), my words. And often too expensive to be economical...see Green River formation.
65.3% is "undiscovered resources" in their words.

Finally, with the numbers provided, anyway you do the math, I can't figure where the "60 times" number comes from.

The "myth", to me, is thinking we can base an energy policy on "technically recoverable", "undiscovered resources" and using potentially too expensive and controversial technology. Should these resources play a role, ABSOLUTELY, but it should not be the primary feature. The boom in ND shows domestic oil currently is considered important in current energy policy.

Will increasing drilling will actually reduce prices? During the current boom with unexpectedly high production ND, it hasn't happened. So yet again, we get this shocking faith in industry scientists, with a verifiable interest in profiteering, from the people who dismiss word of the overwhelming majority of independent academic scientists on such issues as climate change. It's just isn't reconcilable to me.

The articles that I post do not necessarily represent my own viewpoints. I take all this stuff with a grain a salt anymore. On this particular issue I have no opinion, but I certainly don't mind folks expressing their opinions. Heaven knows I see no shortage of misrepresented info out there on a daily basis myself. :)
 
There will be a new day in November. No more slow walking permits and bashing oil companies. Stop the wind (flatus) coming out of the Administration.
 
Like I said at the get-go, my beef was with the headline.
Seems too frequently articles are given headlines under the assumption that people will read no further. It's odd in many cases like this because, to this reader, the actual information in presented in article contradicts it's own headline, hyperlink and sub-title...all of which are variations on the intended take-away.
 
There will be a new day in November. No more slow walking permits and bashing oil companies. Stop the wind (flatus) coming out of the Administration.

Well then we'll see how much of that cheap energy will flow come next year. Hopefully it wont all be deflected to bomb, bomb Iran before we get to benefit.
 
CH, Just read your BLOG. I have to say it was not a daily read for me but when I did read it I enjoyed your take on the market. It's good to hear that you will maintain a weekly response for this group. Hopefully you will have time to lurk in the background and keep us in line once in awhile. ;) Good Luck.
 
Don, from the Seven Sentinels website, posted this analysis last night regarding current market conditions. He's one of the savviest professionals I know. The system I use on the tracker is his original system, but the one he uses currently is more accurate. Along with his intermediate term system, he also now employs a short term system as well.

Dj Vu - Traders-Talk.com
 
Coolhand ... Thanks for posting the link. I've visited the Seven Sentinels web page, but I'm not sure how to use it with the TSP. The system is intriguing, but, again, I'm not sure how to apply it to TSP nor what past/current TSP returns would be. You said you post the old system performance ... is there anywhere to see the performance of the current system?

Thanks.
 
CH, I see you made a move today. How have you been? Miss your seven sentinel postings. Would be nice to see a pullback next week so we can get back into the market. Have a good weekend
 
Hi nasa,

I'm doing fine. Just busy. Been on travel all this week, which is partly why I'm not as active on the board as I used to be. Sentinels are doing pretty well this year as you've probably noticed. I certainly hope it continues.
 
I won't know for sure until early this evening, but if today's selling pressure holds the Seven Sentinels may roll over to an intermediate term sell condition. Having said that, I'm also wary of a whipsaw if that happens because QE3 could evenually counter this sell off at some point soon. The election is also viewed as market supportive, but I'm not taking anything for granted with all the negative overhangs on this market.
 
No sell signal from the Seven Sentinels, but it's only hanging by a thread. Risk is rising, but I can't be sure which direction with all the negatives out there. I'm expecting more upside soon, but I'm still not confident we're there yet. I'm out of IFTs anyway right now, but that's very temporary at this point.
 
Back
Top