coolhand's Account Talk

I've read a few articles and have yet to see where they were borrowing any money.
The way I read it. Not funding FERS (1%). Not sure about the matching for TSP.

Not clear cut but I'm sure it will be clarified over the next few days.
 
Yeah, I don't see any borrowing inferred in the article. Just no funding to pensions. And you may be correct. Only the first 1%, but I'm not sure about that either. If you can't fund 1%, why would the rest get funded?

Of course, not funding the pensions is the first step. Borrowing comes next. :suspicious:
 
Yeah, I don't see any borrowing inferred in the article. Just no funding to pensions. And you may be correct. Only the first 1%, but I'm not sure about that either. If you can't fund 1%, why would the rest get funded?

Of course, not funding the pensions is the first step. Borrowing comes next. :suspicious:

Treasury Tapping Federal Retirement Accounts to Stave Off Default


Published May 16, 2011
| FoxNews.com


At the top of the list is a plan to suspend investments to two government employee retirement funds, while borrowing from one of them.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...es-lawmakers-reach-budget-deal/#ixzz1MYGb95dK
 
The least they could do is wait 24 hours before starting step 2.:D

It's amazing how little they know about running the country but know exactly where to get money when they need it.
Must be the second thing they learn after getting elected. First thing is to learn how to forget all the promises and keep a straight face.
 
To true!
The least they could do is wait 24 hours before starting step 2.:D

It's amazing how little they know about running the country but know exactly where to get money when they need it.
Must be the second thing they learn after getting elected. First thing is to learn how to forget all the promises and keep a straight face.
 
The way it looks right now, there's a very good chance that the Seven Sentinels give another sell signal today. But that's as of now and not necessarily at the close. There's certainly no shortage of selling interest right now.
 
Treasury Yields May Fall Below 3% on Neckline Breach: Technical Analysis

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-...-3-on-neckline-breach-technical-analysis.html

Banks and Merchants Reload for Fee Battle

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...86030.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

McDonald's Under Pressure to Fire Ronald

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...29610340358394.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

The Hidden State Financial Crisis

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...1805612.html?mod=WSJASIA_hpp_sections_opinion

Fed Wants Annual US Bank Stress Tests

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43068610

MATT TAIBBI: Here's How Goldman Sachs Lied To Its Customers And Congress

http://www.businessinsider.com/goldman-sachs-lied-2011-5

LED bulbs hit 100 watts as federal ban looms

http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/environment/2011-05-17-LED-lighting_n.htm
 
Back in the 70's (and maybe 80's) they were much more high profile. There was always new commercials on TV involving Ronald, The Hamburglar, etc.

Seems that died quite some time ago. Perhaps they didn't need the advertising anymore. Or maybe they don't want to be accused of trying to influence the youth of America in eating an unhealthful diet given the cultural pressures and the fact that obesity is rising.

And then there's the toys in every happy meal... :cheesy:

Just amazing you can’t make this stuff up.
 
When I was in college I paid $0.25 for a hamburger from McDonalds - and if it weren't for them there were days I wouldn't eat. The GI bill paid me $110 a month to help with my tuition - how times have changed. My daughter just got $41K as her GI bill to complete her MBA. There are days now that I crave a double fish from McDonalds.
 
Back
Top