coolhand's Account Talk

But, Harry Reid is no Robert Kennedy. I am afraid that anyone hoping to see some honest contrition from him and an admission of racial stereotyping is going to be disappointed. More likely, Reid will reinforce the existing, de facto standard, that racial comments from any Democrat are lamentable, while, at the same time, Reid and other Democrats will continue to be hyper-partisan.
Democrat leaders like Reid, Waxman, Pelosi are essentially stating that only Republicans (and especially conservatives) are guilty of racism or ever make inappropriate and demeaning remarks. Meanwhile, Black Americans like Clarence Thomas on the Supreme Court, Condi Rice at the State Department , or even me while at GSA , are attacked as Uncle Toms and racial sell outs, who, because we hold contrarian ideas are not really Black at all. This deep-seated hypocrisy is not just a double standard, it is an outrage.
More likely, as another election year approaches, Reid and his cohorts will reinforce the double-standard, and attack any Republican that even hints at race, while simultaneously condoning Democratic attempts to demean, to attack, and to disparage any Black American that escapes the Democratic straight jacket of fealty and orthodoxy.

above from link in coolhand's :http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/06/...010/#idc-cover

http://biggovernment.com/2010/01/11/the-democratic-double-standard-on-race-ive-lived-it/
This has another link with in it - going to the hx of her father's life in the '60's. - fascinating!
 
Here's another article on the idea of the government forcing retirees into treasuries for annuities for our own good in their mind.

http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/jan2010/pi2010018_130737.htm

nice link, some interesting points:

"...Promoting annuities may benefit companies that provide them..."

oh god.

"The question is how to encourage it, and whether the government can and should be helpful in that regard,"

oh god, help us.

"...Americans already benefit from "the best annuity in the world, which is Social Security,"

oh god, help us, please.
 
nice link, some interesting points:

"...Promoting annuities may benefit companies that provide them..."

oh god.

"The question is how to encourage it, and whether the government can and should be helpful in that regard,"

oh god, help us.

"...Americans already benefit from "the best annuity in the world, which is Social Security,"

oh god, help us, please.

nice summary...:(
 
umm, i'll take the goldman sachs annuity for minus 50k, alex?

no thanks, i prefer my death straight up. don't need no help from the nurse making it more comfortable. i forget whether i like the blue pill or the red pill, but she got my temperture now judging by the how long the thermometer been up there, so i'm sure i'm going to take one of them in the end.
 
nice link, some interesting points:

"...Promoting annuities may benefit companies that provide them..."

oh god.

"The question is how to encourage it, and whether the government can and should be helpful in that regard,"

oh god, help us.

"...Americans already benefit from "the best annuity in the world, which is Social Security,"

oh god, help us, please.

I have to say O GOD HELP US!:(
 
The best defense against any such possible action is to make sure our government has no reason to be looking for revenue from other sources i.e. ensure the government has adequate funds and is not over-spending (balanced budget or minimal deficits).

The majority of Americans are not government employees and have a low opinion of us. They could care less if the government decided to "borrow" our retirement funds to use for current government operating deficits. In fact most American would probably like the idea since it would not impact them.

But I don't think that is the idea behind encouraging retirees (not just gov't employees) to put their money in annuitites. Annuities are not Treasuries bonds nor are they the G fund. If you retire and put your TSP into an annuity (you are not required to) it won't be a fund run by the government (MetLife currently has the contract with TSP).

We currently have many coices and I don't think that will change.
 
The best defense against any such possible action is to make sure our government has no reason to be looking for revenue from other sources i.e. ensure the government has adequate funds and is not over-spending (balanced budget or minimal deficits).

The majority of Americans are not government employees and have a low opinion of us. They could care less if the government decided to "borrow" our retirement funds to use for current government operating deficits. In fact most American would probably like the idea since it would not impact them.

But I don't think that is the idea behind encouraging retirees (not just gov't employees) to put their money in annuitites. Annuities are not Treasuries bonds nor are they the G fund. If you retire and put your TSP into an annuity (you are not required to) it won't be a fund run by the government (MetLife currently has the contract with TSP).

We currently have many coices and I don't think that will change.

I agree. For now we have to keep an eye on it. Annuities tend to be very expensive vehicles though. I'd advise looking very carefully at that option.
 
Back
Top