What's better: bigger salary with a major cost of living increase at a new location, or tread water but live for next to nothing.
Burro, there are websites that can help you calibrate salary increase benefits relative to cost of living increases. Sites that will break down the comparison between 2 locations, budgetwise and relative incomewise. Do a search on cost-of-living comparison calculator-I have sites bookmarked at work, that help me decide whether to go for that interesting job promotion in that interesting location. If the cost of living difference/salary difference is no more than 5% more in new location-and if housing costs are not a huge difference, I consider going after it, otherwise I leave it to someone else already operating at that level of income.
Today I am looking at a position in DC, a 2 grade promotion. I'd be very competitive for it. I grew up in commuter distance of DC. I know what my dad endured commuting for 26 years there, suit and tie every day etc. etc. Cost of living and housing in this economy? It's a coin toss-lifestyle/income/housing diffential in this economy adds up to heads I win/tails I lose. I'm better off at my age going for quality of life now with house paid off and tucking the former housepayments into Roth brokerage and home energy-efficiency improvements and peace of mind about no debt/no big commute/no expensive clothes required. Your mileage may vary.
So I contribute 10% + the 5% match, have been increasing with COLA's and WIG increases, but i think i'm done now.
Anybody know how that works, say with Schwaab or another similar online outfit? Fees per trade? Annual fees? Minimum contributions? Mostly would buy things not available at tsp, targeted funds like commodities, real estate, private mutual funds that might beat the indexes? That increases the workload to maintain an appropriate asset allocation, would mean tsp goes more conservative. Anybody else doing this?