Arizona Immigration law

Yep that's it for sure!!:laugh:
May Day Immigration Protests: The Other Side of 'Mostly Peaceful'

By Bob Parks (Bio | Archive)
Sun, 05/02/2010 - 18:13 ET




Funny how this went unnoticed by the broadcast media....

A large group of protesters demonstrating at a May Day rally for worker's and immigrant rights downtown broke off into a riot vandalizing about a dozen businesses around 10:30 p.m. Saturday, police said.
Many in the group were carrying makeshift torches as they marched, breaking storefront windows and writing 'anarchist graffiti' on buildings, according to Capt. Steve Clark. Many businesses sustained multiple broken windows including very large storefront windows at Urban Outfitters and The Rittenhouse building. Police believe at least 15 businesses suffered damage.
Now we all know that the slightest amount of liberal violence equals 'mostly peaceful' in the media style book, but we also know what the reporting would be like if we weren't talking about illegal aliens and the anarchist offspring of the far left.



Also buried on page three of a story in the Los Angeles Times (with no pictures)...
As at the earlier demonstration, the Wilshire march was peaceful, with something of a fiesta atmosphere, although afterward about 100 rowdy demonstrators faced off with police, some throwing bottles and breaking windows. Police arrested two males on suspicion of assault with a deadly weapon after an officer was hit in the chest.
Also in MacArthur Park, three men set fire to the corners of two plastic American flags using cigarette lighters and held them up to the crowd. After the flags were burned, someone threw an object at the men, hitting them.
See if this story gets any play while the media continues to remind us how much illegals and their supporters mean to our society.


 
I caught a snippet of a report on TV yesterday that I took to say that ICE/CBP was not going to accept AZ captured illegals. Did I hear right or was it a reporter speculating?
 
Compassion for lawmen? Sure. I have compassion for lawmen. I have no compassion for idiots who pass laws that don't do a thing for the real problem. If you note what I wrote, it wasn't a slam against those who enforce- it was a slam against those politicians who wrote the law that good lawmen now have to go out and enforce.
There are some bad laws out there. We disagree on this one. I think it's a good one.

No- I am defending the rights of ^criminal human beings in the United States. The rights under the Constitution. That are more and more being taken away in the name of "security".

Do you think it's ok for a law enforcement officer to pull you over for no reason? I don't. I don't think DUI roadblocks are within Constitutional boundaries either. Luckily, in my state, neither does my government. In other states it's not the same. That's not right. Either it's within, or not within, the guidelines of the Constitution. I can speak my mind, and in my state, thank goodness, the courts agree with my position. I won't be traveling to Arizona anymore. I was last there last year. I will do what I can to choose to go elsewhere, when I can.
You obviously still haven't read the Arizona law. It's only during a lawful contact that a law enforcement officer can conduct an immigration check on an individual.

But why then post in this thread, about a law enforcement officer being shot? He was shot because he found someone smuggling pot. This thread was about the Arizona law on immigration. That's chumming, if I ever saw it.
I think the suspect was thought to be an illegal alien.

How much is "enough" border patrol? 50,000? 500,000? No one has said what they think it will take to close the border.
Build sufficient fencing along the border and you'll need less people to man it.

My point is that much of the problems faced by our border patrol is because of the laws we now have.
Yes, laws that allow illegal aliens to obtain public assistance.

People flood across the border in hopes to find a better life. Now, we can do one of three things here.

1. We can try and block the border- in which case it may take 500,000 border patrol agents to do. That has a price tag. Are you prepared to pay that kind of price tag? If so, then we need to get serious about it. If not, then it's all for show, not for real. There is nothing as senseless as putting lives on the line for political posturing and show. Our law enforcement officers deserve far better. No officer should be asked to do a job, and then not given the resources to do it with. Same as our military. If you want them to accomplish a mission, you better be prepared to give them every resource needed to fulfill the mission. That's not being done now for our Border Patrol and law enforcement officer community. Something about the price tag, I hear. I agree, though laws that get tougher on employers of illegal aliens and actual enforcement of those laws would help too.

2. Or we can pass immigration reform legislation, that includes temporary worker visas, that allow people to come in and work. Costs far less that option #1. But you can't even bring that up in Congress without critics screaming. Guest worker with no "path to citizenship" I can agree with. The issue I have is that politicians of a particular party see them as "undocumented democrats" and are trying to get them eligible to legally vote in elections.

3. Or you can try and raise the standard of living in other countries, so that not as many people want to come here. That was supposed to be one of the great benefits of free trade under NAFTA. Central American countries and Mexico wages were supposed to rise, and give less reason for folks to come here. That's how it was sold by the politicians at the time, anyway. How's that working out, anyway? Oh yea- Mexico's wages didn't rise. They went down.

Do you want to end smuggling of drugs across the border? It's easy to do. Simply legalize and tax it here, and the crime and violence will disappear. It won't cost taxpayers a dime. It will greatly enhance revenue for the government. But that solution isn't being talked about seriously. Why not? Why is pot illegal, anyway? Think about that.

Do you want to end people coming across the border in the dead of night? With no papers? How do you do that? Easy- give them a way to get legal papers. But that solution isn't being talked about seriously. Why is that?

No- I'm not about to give up Constitutional rights easily. I spent way too much time leaning them, thinking about them, and understanding them to simply turn them off in the name of law enforcement stops.

Law enforcement officers are people just like you and me. They have a job to do. So do I. I just hope they can do theirs within the bounds of the Constitution. When laws are passed which cross that line, I am going to speak up against it. That's just who I am.
So, you disapprove of police officers asking you for your state issued identification and asking you where you were born as part of a traffic stop or other lawful contact, but you are completely for forcing everyone to buy a high cost health insurance product from a private company or face jail time and fines? You say the latter is Constitutional and the former is not? We must be reading from different constitutions.

You got a better idea on how to solve the problem of illegal immigrants? I'm all ears. But simply saying you should pass laws to arrest them if they have cars up on blocks in their yard, or if too many of them are crammed into an apartment, is nothing more than profiling, racism, and it's wrong.
The law doesn't allow officers to conduct an immigration check on someone that has their car up on blocks in their yard, or have too many people in an apartment, though if it's a suspected alien smuggling drop house, then ICE will want to get a search warrant for the property.
 
All I got to say anymore on the subject..as I don't get why everyone is so
p!ssed off about on this...

This country is overrun by blood sucking illegals and we American Citizens natural or otherwise have to pay for them...

If you don't belong here and you are here illegally, you should be found out by means of profiling and roadblocks, especially at the boarders and then arrested and deported back to where ever you came from...If you are legal you should have some form of ID and should have nothing to worry about if asked..if you are asked, get over it, and be thankful the law is looking out for the illegals..I equate it to being asked for my driver's license every time I use a credit card or write a check...I thank the cashier for doing it...I'd say this if I was Indian, Middle Eastern, Mexican, Italian, Cuban, Canadian or even if I was (God forbid) FWM..(I'd especially want that guy cavity searched)
 
Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907.

'In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.'


Theodore Roosevelt 1907
 
Good thing he's dead, or there would have been a lynch mob.:suspicious:
Or the Socialist Liberals would want him to shut his mouth and quit talking so mean about immigrants that don't live by that standard...Good thing there wasn't a delete button back then, huh?
 
I'll tell ya boys I have a Nicaraguan housekeeper that comes by once a month for about four hours to clean the place up. She recently got her drivers license. She is a steady worker and does a very fine job - she makes $100 for her labor and she earns it. Now I don't question her legal status as I have no reason to do so. She and her husband do attend church - they are Catholics. I guess I should never run for any politics for not reporting her income. She does have a full time job working in one of our local hotels. I don't see many members of our minority at risk population going the extra yard to make things better in their lives - all they do is pray for more entitlements.
 
I'll tell ya boys I have a Nicaraguan housekeeper that comes by once a month for about four hours to clean the place up. She recently got her drivers license. She is a steady worker and does a very fine job - she makes $100 for her labor and she earns it. Now I don't question her legal status as I have no reason to do so. She and her husband do attend church - they are Catholics. I guess I should never run for any politics for not reporting her income. She does have a full time job working in one of our local hotels. I don't see many members of our minority at risk population going the extra yard to make things better in their lives - all they do is pray for more entitlements.
:confused::confused:Haven't a clue about the point you are trying to make..your english is broken:D...But I have a feeling this Housekeeper of yours is legal and can proudly claim she and her Husband are American.
 
UN rights experts criticize Arizona law
By ELIANE ENGELER (AP) – 15 hours ago

GENEVA — Arizona's new law on illegal immigration could violate international standards that are binding in the United States, six U.N. human rights experts said Tuesday.
The basic human rights regulations, signed by the U.S. and many other nations, regard issues such as discrimination and the terms under which a person can be detained, the experts said.
"A disturbing pattern of legislative activity hostile to ethnic minorities and immigrants has been established with the adoption of an immigration law that may allow for police action targeting individuals on the basis of their perceived ethnic origin," the experts said.[more]

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jfqIE05xeX2o-nFfnJJhHPApN2JwD9FKJK8O0
 
UN rights experts criticize Arizona law
Now that's funny right there...
biglol.gif
 
maybe something about sovereign rights and independence? or how about the UN would be broke without US funding? (that's you and me folks). more taxes anyone, they've done such a good job managing our current contributions, now where did i put my rose colored glasses?
 
Excuse me for not understanding this reaction to the news story about the UN expressing concerns about the Arizona law. Could you please clarify for me? Is it because you don't agree with the UN? Or that you don't care about the UN? Or ....?
So sad that you think so highly of this contraption called the UN..But Burrocrat summed it up pretty good though...There's more, but it ain't worth going down that road any further.:sick:
 
UN rights experts criticize Arizona law
"A disturbing pattern of legislative activity hostile to ethnic minorities and immigrants has been established with the adoption of an immigration law that may allow for police action targeting individuals on the basis of their perceived ethnic origin," the experts said.[more]

I am going to have to take time this weekend to find where that law is posted & reread it; because I've been thinking of it as related to `illegal aliens,' not the immigrants.

This kinda makes me think of the story of the highly intoxicated fellow who is at the street corner, on his knees, obviously searching for something. A passerby asks if can help, the guy says, yeah, his dropped his keys. So the two of them search, the helpful man says `they aren't anywhere around here - are you sure this is where you dropped them?' The inebriated fellow replies, `Oh no, I dropped them down the block.' But it was dark down there, so he came up to where the street light is so he could see.
My point being - use of `perceived ethnic origin.' If unable to speak English, nod `yes' to all questions & statements, that doesn't seem to me to be `perceived.'
If you've dropped your keys, you have to search in the area you lost them.
 
Back
Top