The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
He stores White Castles in the pouch under his chin, like a pelican.![]()
12%,
That free heat thing is the most ridiculous thing I have ever seen. It makes me question the intelligence of some people. Don't they realize that once the sunlight has entered the house so has the radiant heat. That is why when you step on the floor where the sun is shinning it feels nice and warm in the winter.
I saw one similar to this once that was for "free" a/c. They buried pipes in the ground and then forced air through them that recirculated to the house. A quick thermal analysis shows this won't work not to mention the additional humidity you would be sending into the house.
Bouncetime...triple digit gain coming!!!!!!!!!!!!
The bears will soon be getting nervous - the squeez will be next as we rally up. Geesus, I'd like to see a 300 point banger from programs. We got plenty of time to make it happen. Got to keep 12% content you know.
I ran out of steam. Bottom-line is just stay postioned until DEC.31th and we will scream then...S Fund will have a huge,huge,huge rally. 14000s or bust for me.Lets cheer louder!![]()
True, stay the course and we will be fine.Theres still hope there 12%. Last half hours have been real doozies.
Geaux
They can say whatever they want. 3000 sounds like a very low number. However;it does not matter if its one person or 5 million. They are changing the rules.On the issue of the limit on trades...if I understand correctly, the limit to two trades per month will be for EVERYONE. The articles that I've seen on this seem to imply that it's just this mystical 3000 people who are affected. They imply that in their writing, while also barely mentioning, again, if I'm understanding correctly, that these limits apply to all 4 million of us. My point is, the implication is that these 3000 people are the cause of the change in policy, but I don't believe that's the case. The wording of the articles sends the wrong message, an untrue message, which is not at all uncommon in news reporting. People are writing about something they don't have substantial knowledge of, and that makes it easy to miss the whole point. This change is due to the fact that a very high percentage of people are moving money on a very regular basis. The issue of the 3000 people was probably used as an example by TSP officials in talking to the media, but they left the untrue perception that this was the primary cause. I can't imagine it's the case that TSP would make such a substantial change over the actions of 3000 in a system of 4 million people. There's no way they could win that argument. Again, what I'm saying is that this change is caused by people LIKE US, and multiple thousands of others, if not even a full million people, or whatever percentage of people it is that makes fairly regular changes, large or small. If I'm missing something, let me know.
On the issue of the limit on trades...if I understand correctly, the limit to two trades per month will be for EVERYONE. The articles that I've seen on this seem to imply that it's just this mystical 3000 people who are affected. They imply that in their writing, while also barely mentioning, again, if I'm understanding correctly, that these limits apply to all 4 million of us. My point is, the implication is that these 3000 people are the cause of the change in policy, but I don't believe that's the case. The wording of the articles sends the wrong message, an untrue message, which is not at all uncommon in news reporting. People are writing about something they don't have substantial knowledge of, and that makes it easy to miss the whole point. This change is due to the fact that a very high percentage of people are moving money on a very regular basis. The issue of the 3000 people was probably used as an example by TSP officials in talking to the media, but they left the untrue perception that this was the primary cause. I can't imagine it's the case that TSP would make such a substantial change over the actions of 3000 in a system of 4 million people. There's no way they could win that argument. Again, what I'm saying is that this change is caused by people LIKE US, and multiple thousands of others, if not even a full million people, or whatever percentage of people it is that makes fairly regular changes, large or small. If I'm missing something, let me know.