Would You Like Fries With That Volatility?

The one thing that I've been fairly sure about the last couple of weeks (with respect to the market) is volatility. We've once again walked up to the brink of rolling over this market, only to shoot back higher again on breadth and volume. It really feels like a trap is being set, but I'm not sure whether it's a bull or bear trap. I suspect the latter, but that's been a losing bet for months.

I suppose the biggest development of the day was the report that Gaddafi accepted a peace plan as put forth by Venezuela's Chavez. Given who we're talking about here, I don't see this as more than a brief news item. But oil still reacted to it by dipping below $100 per barrel early on, and then rallying back to finish the day with a modes 0.3% loss $101.91 per barrel.

And for some reason market data became a focal point again. Stock prices took off on an initial jobless claim number of 368,000, which was moderately lower than the estimated 400,000 that was expected. The "rumor" is that since this claims total was less than 400,000 for the third time in four weeks and yesterday's ADP Employment Change was better than expected, tomorrow's February nonfarm payrolls report should look great. Sell the news? That's my expectation, but it probably won't be that simple.

Nonfarm payrolls for January was up 36,000, which fell far short of expectations.

The February ISM Services Index also helped the bullish cause, but posting a 59.7, which is its best reading since 2005.

Overall, the market posted impressive gains and the Seven Sentinels improved as a result.

Here's today's charts:

$NAMO.jpg

Back into positive territory for NAMO and NYMO. Both are flashing buys.

$NAHL.jpg

NAHL and NYHL are also flashing buys.

$TRIN.jpg

TRIN and TRINQ spiked lower and are now both on buys. They are overdone however, and suggest short term weakness may be near.

BPCOMPQ.png

BPCOMPQ flipped back to a buy on today's action.

So all signals are flashing buys, which keeps the system on a buy.

I would not get too comfortable with today's bullish action however. That doesn't mean we can't move on to new highs, but this volatility has not been a hallmark of the bull run we've seen since last September. And the events playing out overseas will probably continue to roil the markets. In less volatile days the Seven Sentinels could sniff out a looming decline, but this volatility is not going to allow the Seven Sentinels to get out of the way fast enough should a fast, hard decline come. And that's almost certainly the way it'll happen. I think that the fact we didn't rally on the 1st of March may have been a warning.
 
LMAO @ Chavez brokering peace in the middle east. If he wasn't such a dictator, the US would contract the majority of his nations crude. In this environment his country would reap the benefits of this volatility.

- E
 
It was pretty ridiculous. And the market loved it. :rolleyes:

EmoDx;bt2881 said:
LMAO @ Chavez brokering peace in the middle east. If he wasn't such a dictator, the US would contract the majority of his nations crude. In this environment his country would reap the benefits of this volatility.

- E
 
I am not a Chavez fan but the simple fact is that being "such a dictator" has nothing to do with it. We prop up dictatorships and monarchies throughout the Middle East and the world. Dictatorship isn't at issue, but if they are "our dictators". When "our dictators" fall, the citizenry is not likely to be pro-American. Chavez rose to power in opposition to the corrupt Carlos Andres Perez and the systemic corruption resulting from the Punto Fijo pact.

A cab driver in Caracas, who loved Chavez, bragged to me last year that bottled water cost more in Venezuela than gasoline. I asked him why then was the fare from the airport so high. He said: "Señor, it is so hot here we have to drink a lot of water."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top