What Happened To Global Warming, it's NOT!!

[CountryBoy]

The only thing Firewatermethead knows about Rectal thermometers compared to the oral type is the Taste.

Props to ya, since the Rep thingy was turned off. I'm still laughing. :laugh:

 

[nnuut]

We agree!!!!!!

The snowstorms had nothing to do, per say with global warming...nor did they have anything to do with disputing global warming (like Sean Hannity claiming there was no global warming because of the cold snowy winter in DC.).

The debate continues...but at least we can agree that this has nothing to do, one way or the other with global warming (or not).

Sure and that also goes for the warmer temperatures to the north of us!!

 

[nnuut]

Here it is: http://www.breitbart.tv/youtube-yanks-all-versions-of-hide-the-decline-climategate-song/​

Or Click the Breitbart TV link below!

YouTube Pulls All Versions of 'Hide the Decline' ClimateGate Videos​

By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
Wed, 04/21/2010 - 20:57 ET​

A day after Minnesotans For Global Warming pulled their "Hide the Decline" video from YouTube at the request of ClimateGate scientist Michael Mann, all versions of this global warming satire were apparently removed from the powerful website.
As NewsBusters reported Tuesday, M4GW received a threat from Mann's representatives stating that if the video was not taken down, he would sue.
After M4GW complied with Mann's request, the No Cap and Trade Coalition posted a new version of "Hide the Decline" on YouTube.
Unfortunately on Wednesday, this new version AND all related videos were removed from YouTube supposedly due to a copyright claim by JibJab Media, Inc.​

According to M4GW's Elmer Beauregard, this makes no sense ("Hide the Decline II" video embedded below the fold courtesy Breitbart TV):

It is true the original version did contain JibJab content, the claymation video with Michael Mann's head on it was made on JibJab's website. I also put a disclaimer at the beginning of the website that JibJab was not responsible for this content.

​

The new version "Hide The Decline II" did not, however, contain any JibJab content or the image of Michale Mann that was in dispute in the letter from Mann's attorney. So I'm wondering why it got yanked. I'm sure it was a little like playing Whack-A-Mole for youTube, everybody and their sister was uploading the original version to their youTube channel. Maybe in their zeal youTube inadvertently wiped out the new version.

​

With Blip TV allowing the new version to be posted, it will be interesting to see whether its management receives a complaint from JibJab.

Stay tuned.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/04/21/youtube-pulls-all-versions-hide-decline-climategate-videos#ixzz0lwP9WAl3​

​

 

[Viva_La_Migra]

New revelations on climategate.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591415,00.html

 

[burrocrat]

View attachment 9095

 

[alevin]

ooh, that's a good one, burro.:laugh:

 

[Valkyrie]

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

 

[Buster]

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

It don't matter..the Treehuggers and their likes will never admit they are stupid as sheep....

reducing greenhouse gas emissions – will someday seem as outdated as using leeches to cure human illnesses.

 

[nnuut]

W.H.: Climate bill this year

Browner stands by legislation

By POLITICO STAFF | 04/25/10 7:56 AM

Carol M. Browner, assistant to the president for energy and climate change. | Photo by Matt Sobocinksi Close


Carol M. Browner, assistant to the president for energy and climate change, in a statement released by the White House late Saturday night, said “we have an historic opportunity” to pass a climate change and energy bill despite Sen. Lindsay Graham’s decision not to support the legislation he was co-authoring if Democrats prioritize immigration. “We’re determined to see it happen this year,” she said.
Browner’s full statement: "We believe the only way to make progress on these priorities is to continue working as we have thus far in a bipartisan manner to build more support for both comprehensive energy independence and immigration reform legislation. "We commend Senators Kerry, Graham and Lieberman for the tremendous work they have done to date to seize this moment and build a new coalition of business and environmental leaders and their efforts to craft a bill that will garner the votes to pass the Senate. "We have an historic opportunity to finally enact measures that will break our dependence on foreign oil, help create clean energy jobs and reduce carbon pollution. We're determined to see it happen this year, and we encourage the Senators to continue their important work on behalf of the country and not walk away from the progress that's already been made."
http://www.politico.com/politico44/...ear_7ca076c7-b448-4550-a44f-52309bcf5f36.html

 

[Aviator_Guy]

I needed some global warming when I got slammed with 2 feet of snow last Feb while TDY in Virginia!! I took this video and posted it on CNN iReport after waking up with my rental car covered in snow...LOL

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-405079

 

[Show-me]

Valkyrie,

Nice signature.

 

[nnuut]

Media Reality Check: 20 Years of Advocacy, Not Journalism, On Global Warming​

By Rich Noyes (Bio | Archive)
Thu, 04/22/2010 - 15:04 ET ​

For more than two decades, the so-called mainstream media have preached the dangers of manmade global warming, insisting American businesses and consumers must make massive economic sacrifices to ward off a global climate catastrophe. Not even last November’s exposure of e-mails from leading scientists on the alarmist side of the debate — showing them conniving to fudge or suppress data, discredit critics and distort the peer review process — has caused journalists to finally take a skeptical approach to radical environmentalists’ doomsaying.​

A new study from the MRC’s Business & Media Institute documents how ABC, CBS and NBC have been just as strident in their advocacy in the months following “ClimateGate” as they were in the 20 years that preceded the scandal. At the same time, a review of the Media Research Center’s archives going back to the late 1980s shows just how strongly reporters have pushed the liberal line on global warming. Here are just some of the many examples:​

■ “Global warming could mean economic upheaval. It could bring suffering. It could bring starvation....The causes of global warming are no mystery. The biggest culprit is carbon dioxide, or CO2, a bi-product when man burns fossil fuels to run cars or generate electricity....If we fail to act, there may be hell to pay in a hotter world....Global warming is not a fact, just a widely-held theory. The problem is, if man waits for proof, it may be too late.”
— Host Don Harrison narrating CNN’s primetime Climate In Crisis special, August 1, 1989.​

■ “As the science editor at Time, I would freely admit that on this issue we have crossed the boundary from news reporting to advocacy.”
— Time’s Charles Alexander at a September 16, 1989 global warming conference at the Smithsonian Institute, as quoted in the October 5 Wall Street Journal.​

■ “If the world is to head off the risk of global warming, with its danger of massive crop failure, or rising sea levels, or spreading starvation in the poorest countries, then America — the largest producer of the gases that cause global warming — is in the spotlight.”
— ABC reporter Ned Potter on World News Tonight, April 7, 1992.​

■ “Environmentalists see catastrophes of biblical proportions, from droughts to melting ice caps that send sea levels rising.”
— Correspondent Barry Petersen on the CBS Evening News, December 1, 1997.​

■ Karen Kerrigan, Small Business Survival Committee: “To say that the science is conclusive...is actually bunk.”
Host Ted Koppel: “I was just going to make the observation that there are still some people who believe in the Flat Earth Society, too, but that doesn’t mean they’re right.”
— Exchange on the December 9, 1997 Nightline.



[more]​

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/rich-n...-years-advocacy-not-journalism-global-warming​

 

[nnuut]

Good flick if you have time!!
This was before the ClimateGaters were caught in the act!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5576670191369613647#

 

[grandma]

http://www.drroyspencer.com/

Very interesting articles -
A quote from within the first one(April 21):

The infrared component has essentially no trend between March 2000 and December 2007 (the last CERES Earth radiation budget data I have analyzed). This suggests a small decrease in low or mid-level cloud cover, letting more sunlight in. The fact that the extra energy is not showing up as a temperature increase in the ocean makes me suspect the measurements themselves. If there is a problem with the Earth radiation budget measurements, then obviously there is no missing energy.

 

[Buster]

Good flick if you have time!!
This was before the ClimateGaters were caught in the act!!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5576670191369613647#

This should be posted every other post until the Algoreites and Kool-aid drinkers wake up..


Excellent Norm!

 

[Valkyrie]

Valkyrie,

Nice signature.

Thanks
here is the full quote

"We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."
- John Adams to the Officers of the First Brigade of the Third Division of the Militia of Massachusetts, October 11, 1798

 

[Viva_La_Migra]

Further proof that Global Warming is not caused by mankind.

Much of Texas was once submerged under the Western Interior Seaway. The massive sea split North America from the Gulf of Mexico to the Arctic Ocean.

 

[Valkyrie]

Click Here for Printer Friendly Version <http://www.caseyresearch.com/displayCdd.php?id=424>

Weekend Edition
Earth Day Revisited

Dear Reader,
On April 22, Earth Day came and went without even a casual mention by us in this Daily Dispatch. At first I thought this was the correct approach, as even a passing word on the event could lend it credence. But now I’m of the opinion that since this past Earth Day marked its 40th anniversary, it’s worth revisiting the day’s beginnings.
And before you rake me over the coals for "not caring about Mother Earth," I’d like you to know that I (usually) bring my own reusable grocery bag to the store, refill water bottles numerous times, refrain from littering, recycle, and generally try to live in a way that doesn’t pollute my surroundings. I have no problem with these sorts of activities. What I have a problem with are the outlandish claims made by climate alarmists that aren’t rooted in sound science.
Forty years ago, when Earth Day was born, many dire predictions were being made about our species’ impact on the environment, and it’s important to know what those claims were, so you can judge the historical accuracy of the climate change movement.
Here’s a link <http://www.examiner.com/x-25061-Climate-Change-Examiner~y2010m4d22-Earth-Days-40th-anniversary--Celebrating-40-years-of-outrageous-predictions> to an excellent article on the subject titled "Earth Day 2010 – Celebrating 40 years of outrageous predictions of doom."
The claims cited in the article include:
* The founder of Earth Day, Senator Gaylord Nelson, famously proclaimed that, "Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years [1995], somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct."


* One of the more interesting statements made by Dr. Paul Ehrlich, author of the largely discredited book The Population Bomb, was that "at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years." The esteemed Dr. Ehrlich also warned that air pollution would "take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone."


* North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter echoed Ehrlich’s predictions of death. He said, "Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine."


* In one of its 1970 issues, Life Magazine wrote that "Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support… the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half…"


* Manmade climate change was around back then, but it wasn’t global warming that they were worried about, it was global cooling. Kenneth Watt, professor emeritus at the University of California at Davis, warned, "The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age."


So, when you hear the great Al Gore spout dire predictions about the days ahead and why such future events are "certain," it might behoove you to recall the dire predictions made by other "experts" over the years and to ponder whether the seers of today are likely to be any more accurate. I would bet not.

 

[nnuut]

Yeah, it's nnuuts just like the Markets!

 

[Valkyrie]

here is another democrat that thinks the american people are only as smart as a sixth grader about climate change.
vote the clown out this nov.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65515