In a rally, there are usually 3 drives to a high. From the March 2009 lows that would be: 1) March - May, 2) July and 3) September. The October surge from SPX 1019 is a little strange. The market started a downtrend from 1080, rose back up and is now backtesting a broken trendline with a double top. Double tops can be a little higher on the right side or can equal the former top (1080) and break down. A little higher would stall somewhere near or below the 50% fibonacci retracement near SPX 1121.
My system is not confirming a move into the market in C S or I at this time.
Here is a chart of bonds 10 year treasury notes (TNX):
View attachment 6966
From the start of 2009 we see a bearish rising wedge (the rising yellowish lines) that broke down in mid August. This is when bonds started a slow but sure rally in price. Next notice the downward sloping green channel. this goes back many years. You can see the TNX recently fell below the center green line near 3.50% yield, and is now back above. However, IMO the chart is bearish because: 1) where the market is now is between the pink horizontal line and the middle green line - this is a bearish descending triangle, 2) the green channel is sloping down, 3) the bearish rising wedge broke down, and 4) the MACD and RSI point down. I am seeing the purple horizontal line as significant support just under a 3.00% yield. The 3.50% yield middle green line is support for now, but has been broken under recently, so can be easily compromised. Based on these factors, I see higher prices ahead for bonds. This is also a contrarian market indicator.
Uptrend,
This is only to share some possibilities. You mentioned above that "The October surge from SPX 1019 is a little strange." I agree. Perhaps part of the explanation was discussed this morning on CNBCs Strictly Money (Europe) around 6:00 A.M.
The conclusion I understood is that this will be a jobless recovery with massive asset reflation worldwide - associated with massive liquidity. Presumably this rally to the upside should continue, with corrections of course. Perhaps this explains why the traditional TA indicators, signs, and signals are not as "predictive" as they are in "normal" times.
With all due respect, I leave any further analysis or conclusions to others. Best wishes!