imported post
TEUFEL HUNDEN wrote:
Tspgo, I have looked into it a little more and found that Fri I Earned .13% on my I fund the EFA symbol shows a gain of .50% and the EFV shows a gain of .17% so I would venture to say that the EFV is more closely related to the I fund than the EFA.
When I asked what symbol you entered to retrieve G, F, C, S from Big Chart I misunderstood that you were actually retrieving G, F, C, S and I, not the funds they track.
My observation for several years has been that the F, S, and I funds do not follow the daily or intra day activity of the AGG, EFA, (EFV) DWCP (EMW), EFV as the C follows the SPX (S&P). If you average several days of daily closing prices the discrepancies tend to disappear.
I opted to analyze the funds (G, F, C, S, and I) themselves after I looked at and tested several mathematical models. My conclusion was that each fund (G, F, C, S and I) has been in existence long enough to acquire an identity of its own and that whatever forces that drive the fund it tracks ( EFA, AGG, S&P, bonds, etc) have become an intrinsic behavioral part of the TSP fund (G, F, C, S and I) itself. In other words, if they would stop reporting the S&P, EFA, AGG, and the DWCP daily activity, we should be able to make our IFT decisions with they same confidence and certainty as we do it today by simply observing the behavior of the individual TSP fund.
This is the reason why my IFT decisions are mostly based on technical analysis of the fund themselves. I take the TSP fund price and calculate their different moving averages. To determine pivots, supports and resistances I use the low and high in the last 5 days. They help decide when to take profit in a good rally.
Thank you all.
TSPGO!