2005 Tally Analysis
The attached compares the 2005 Tally results in terms of return, standard deviation, and Sharpe Ratio (a measure of risk adjusted return - higher is better). The return statistics were taken from Milkman's Tally tracker.
The burgundy areas indicate performance superior to the average market timer. By any measure, Dakota, Show-me, Rolo, and Neirbod took extra risk and it paid off, i.e. high return and high Sharpe Ratio. Others, took on higher risk but didn't get paid, i.e. higher standard deviation and relatively low Sharpe Ratio.
I created the passive Global Equities portfolio to see how a stock only, global capitalization based portfolio would have done in 2005. Actually, fairly well. It would have returned 9.95%. The portfolio is 50% domestic and 50% foreign. Specifically, 39% C Fund, 11% S Fund, and 50% I Fund.
The attached compares the 2005 Tally results in terms of return, standard deviation, and Sharpe Ratio (a measure of risk adjusted return - higher is better). The return statistics were taken from Milkman's Tally tracker.
The burgundy areas indicate performance superior to the average market timer. By any measure, Dakota, Show-me, Rolo, and Neirbod took extra risk and it paid off, i.e. high return and high Sharpe Ratio. Others, took on higher risk but didn't get paid, i.e. higher standard deviation and relatively low Sharpe Ratio.
I created the passive Global Equities portfolio to see how a stock only, global capitalization based portfolio would have done in 2005. Actually, fairly well. It would have returned 9.95%. The portfolio is 50% domestic and 50% foreign. Specifically, 39% C Fund, 11% S Fund, and 50% I Fund.
Last edited: