Squalebear's Account Talk

If GWB had anything new to add, the markets would have responded as
they have. Just as when Ben and Paulson spoke, we simply wanted to hear
some decisive move, something new for gosh sakes. Alas, nothing new
came from his lips and the market was disappointed for sure.

I've been hearing more and more about a bottom today or coming on Monday.
I just hope we can squeek by today without losing our Spongebob Boxers :worried:
 
Yes, the market is open until Thanksgiving Holiday !

http://www.rightline.net/calendar/market-holidays.html

The TSP will be closed. ie......Any IFT from now until
Tuesday before noon will count on (COB TUESDAY) Wednesday Trading Day.

The Thrift Savings Plan will be closed on Monday, October 13th, in observance of Columbus Day. Transactions that would have been processed Monday night (October 13th) will be processed Tuesday night (October 14th), at Tuesday's closing share prices
 
The Thrift Savings Plan will be closed on Monday, October 13th, in observance of Columbus Day. Transactions that would have been processed Monday night (October 13th) will be processed Tuesday night (October 14th), at Tuesday's closing share prices

Which In Turn, Won't Be Affected By The Market Until Wednesday ;)

May The Force Be With Us and May The Market jump upward at 3:15pm !:)
 
Down But Not Out ! With the TSP Funds being down between
-37.67% and -44.81% YTD, I'm invested at 40% with 60%(G) Fund.
I'm down -18.54% YTD and actually feel blessed that I'm not a Buy
and Hold Investor like the TSP wrote about in their recent Highlights.
However, that's exactly what I've done with my 40% invested in the
(C) and (S) Fund. I'm waiting for capitulation in the (C) and (I) Funds.
It appears that the (S) Fund capitulated today and ended positive.
Lets hope the G7 meeting sheds some positive news and the Market
will fly on Monday. The TSP is closed on Monday for Columbus Day,
but the markets are open for business. Any IFT done between now
and Tuesday at noon will go into effect at the COB on Tuesday for
Wednesday's Trading Day. I'll be back later tonight to update the O/D
Tracker.;)
 
YTD O/D FOR ALL TSP FUNDS

(C) Fund vs. the SPX = 0.1779 TSP Cent Overpayment or +1.72%
(S) Fund vs. DWCPF. = 0.2876 TSP Cent Overpayment or +2.29%
(I). Fund vs. the EFA = 0.2109 TSP Cent Overpayment or +1.54%:confused:

DAILY (I) FUND VS. EFA O/D TRACKING RESULTS:


......DATE.....DLY % DIFF.....YTD TSP CENTS.....
(09/08/08) +0.1989% -0.3171 tsp cents
(09/09/08) +0.0157% -0.3098 tsp cents
(09/10/08) -0.1535% -0.2831 tsp cents
(09/11/08) -0.1739% -0.2491 tsp cents
(09/12/08) -0.3907% -0.1778 tsp cents

......DATE.....DLY % DIFF.....YTD TSP CENTS.....
(09/15/08) +0.8638% -0.3323 tsp cents
(09/16/08) -0.2278% -0.2873 tsp cents
(09/17/08) +0.8268% -0.4262 tsp cents
(09/18/08) -2.0361% -0.0642 tsp cents
(09/19/08) -0.4960%+0.0283 tsp cents

......DATE.....DLY % DIFF.....YTD TSP CENTS.....
(09/22/08)+2.5382% -0.4628 tsp cents
(09/23/08) -0.8997% -0.2822 tsp cents
(09/24/08) -0.2518% -0.2347 tsp cents
(09/25/08) -0.5076% -0.1412 tsp cents
(09/26/08) +0.3903% -0.2149 tsp cents

......DATE.....DLY % DIFF.....YTD TSP CENTS.....
(09/29/08)+2.3205% -0.6001 tsp cents

(09/30/08) -3.4591%+0.0025 tsp cents
(10/01/08) -0.7365% -0.1291 tsp cents

(10/02/08) -0.0580% -0.1135 tsp cents
(10/03/08)+0.6851% -0.2312 tsp cents

......DATE.....DLY % DIFF.....YTD TSP CENTS.....
(10/06/08) -0.1022% -0.2014 tsp cents
(10/07/08)+1.0228% -0.3531 tsp cents
(10/08/08) -1.3004% -0.1455 tsp cents
(10/09/08)+1.1848% -0.3078 tsp cents
(10/10/08) -0.6113% -0.2109 tsp cents:confused:

THE KEY:
------------------------------------------------- WE OWE THEM ----
- .6000 thru -.4000 High Overpayment (Payback Past Due)
- .4000 thru -.3000 Elavated Overpayment, (Payback Immanent)
- .3000 thru -.2000 Medium Overpayment (Flip A Coin):confused:
- .2000 thru -.1000 Low Overpayment, (Slightly Over Goal)
- .1000 thru -.0000 Minimum Overpayment (Goal is Met)
-------------------------------------------------- THEY OWE US ----
+.0000 thru+.1000 Low Deficit (Goal is Met)
+.1000 thru+.1500 Medium Deficit (Flip A Coin)
+.1500 thru+.2500 High Deficit (Rarely Goes Lower)
+.2500 thru+.3000 Windfall Coming !
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
YTD IDX returns: YTD TSP returns: YTD SB current returns:
SPX= -38.76%.....C=...-37.67%....-18.54% (my figures) :)
DW.= -37.89%.....S=.. -36.50%....
EFA= -46.04%......I=...-44.81%...
AGG= -12.62%.....F=...-00.44%...
...........................G=...+02.97%...

MTD IDX returns: MTD TSP returns: MTD SB current returns:
SPX= -22.90%.....C=...-22.81%....-13.58%(my figures) :worried:
DW.= -24.33%.....S=.. -24.34%....
EFA= -24.76%.....I=....-23.55%...
AGG= -10.34%.....F=...-01.27%...
............................G=..+00.10%..
 
As I sit by my lonesome and have the time to ponder the events and issues
which have rocked this nation to the core, I've come up with one very
unpopular and hardly mentioned conclusion. As far as the eye can see,
the American Public are angry over the hundreds of billions of dollars that
was handed to the Secretary of the Treasury. They are angry that we're
bailing out financial institutions, banks are being liquified, gasoline prices,
food prices and our economic situation as a whole. Then I had to ask
myself, what would truly happen if nothing was done ? Was I in denial
when many an expert said, the country would never survive? Would we
truly have a run on the banks that would put the "Great Depression" to
shame ? Would the unemployment lines be longer then the bread lines
of the early thirties? My answer was not found easily because of the
decades of lies thrown at me by those in power. The politicians who
govern this country played a tremendous part in this turmoil. Both sides
of the isle ! Corporate greed, cooked books, Lies, Snails and Puppy Dog
tales. There's plenty of blame to go around. Lets not forget that its
never our fault for being coerced into buying things we truly can't afford.
The ulternative was to do nothing. I don't think anyone has a clue what
kind of devistation we would see if that happend. I'd rather be in denial.
 
Squalebear,
There are no simple solutions to this crisis. However, to remain on the sidelines as an observer, while resting on the "lazy boy", and to think that the pieces falling apart will come together miraculously without the need for government intervention and without the implementation of sound financial policies, is a falacy. It's not going to happen automatically. Allowing the financial system to collapse would guarantee a depression. I believe that we can implement a solution without curtailing our liberties, or abolishing the free enterprise system. As freedom loving American citizens, we can demand that our elected representatives assure us that whatever emergency measures are taken do not open the door to the establishment of any type of dictatorship or totalitarian government. Reason must be applied, and check and balances have to be inserted in any legislation.
 
Last edited:
Squalebear,
There are no simple solutions to this crisis. However, to remain on the sidelines as an observer, while resting on the "lazy boy", and to think that the pieces falling apart will come together miraculously without the need for government intervention and without the implementation of sound financial policies, is a falacy. It's not going to happen automatically. Allowing the financial system to collapse would guarantee a depression. I believe that we can implement a solution without curtailing our liberties, or abolishing the free enterprise system. As freedom loving American citizens, we can demand that our elected representatives assure us that whatever emergency measures are taken do not open the door to the establishment of any type of dictatorship or totalitarian government. Reason must be applied, and check and balances have to be inserted in any legislation.

If I'm not mistaken, we are in total agreement ! It was the thought
of how close we've come to total financial ruin which lead me to my
conclusion. Maybe I didn't express it to well in my last post as I was
not home and in a very big hurry to leave my surroundings. I meant
to say; I would rather be in denial about how close we came and give
the money to those who helped cause this problem to begin with instead
of saying; Damn all who were responsible and let the chips fall where they
may. That alternative is too scarey to even think about because it would
be the end of this Country for many years to come. The alternative is just
unacceptable, plain and simple.

With that said, did I mention how much common sense came through
in your post. Brother, I couldn't have put it any better myself. Last night
I was feeling a bit philosophical and I guess it came through in my writing.
I'm guilty of doing that often and it sometimes clouds my original point.
Thank you for adding some common sense to my thread. Believe me, I'm
still hearing people talk about how the Government should have just
stayed out of this mess and let the Banks fail. That is what drove me
to post something, because I don't share their views. I share yours !;)
 
If anyone wants a continued Donkey policy of affirmatve action in education, affirmative action in employment, affirmative action in mortages, affirmative action in home ownership, then the current social engineering as practiced today you need to vote for Nobama. He will see to it that they continue. I won't get started on multiculturalism but it does seek to reduce standards and aspiration - the silent majority of America will do the right thing. One solution that might help is to change the laws and allow more than one family per domicile. That way five families could pool their welfare checks and meet their obligations to pay the mortage on the five bedroom house.
 
If anyone wants a continued Donkey policy of affirmatve action in education, affirmative action in employment, affirmative action in mortages, affirmative action in home ownership, then the current social engineering as practiced today you need to vote for Nobama. He will see to it that they continue. I won't get started on multiculturalism but it does seek to reduce standards and aspiration - the silent majority of America will do the right thing. One solution that might help is to change the laws and allow more than one family per domicile. That way five families could pool their welfare checks and meet their obligations to pay the mortage on the five bedroom house.

What an interesting point of view. The reduction of standards and aspirations caught my eye. No longer do we live in a world were "Best Qualified" means a Strong Work Ethic, Loyalty, Motivation and the Desire To Be Part Of A Team. I'm sure there's two sides to every story, however, I've lived it and can relate to what you have said. The Politics mentioned and the solution presented I'll leave we enough alone. ;)
 
http://http://seekingalpha.com/arti...or-risks-and-explanations?source=etf_in_focus

The upper table in the image posted below shows the current tracking error in EFA vs. the underlying EAFE index. [edit: as of 9/30, not 10/10]

http://http://www.etfconnect.com/select/rank/default.asp?fType=2&oType=2&etf=Y&num=226
The lower table below, goes with current EFA discount relative to the underlying index EAFE.


Squale, first question is, does EFA tracking error against EAFE relate at all to the tracking error in I fund relative to EAFE? Are they even same direction (neg vs. pos) right now?

Second question is, does the EFA discount against EAFE have any implications for I fund against EAFE? (are your numbers "they owe us vs. we owe them" related at all to discount value of I against EAFE? do we have any way to figure out the current discount?)

It took me a lot of work to get image down to acceptable size dimensions and KB, much harder for me than KevinD makes it out to be, but at least I got this much worked out-even if I'm doing it the hard way (probably am) :cheesy:

View attachment 4866
 
Last edited:
Squale, first question is, does EFA tracking error against EAFE relate at all to the tracking error in I fund relative to EAFE? Are they even same direction (neg vs. pos) right now?

After trying to research the links you provided for me, I find my self lost (embarrassed) and without an answer to your question. The information I use in the tracker is extremely broad based and incorporates many things that I'm not even aware of. Exchange Rate and Fair Value are also incorporated into my figures. For me, it wasn't important as to why the EFA differed from the (I) Fund, it was the level of the differences which gave me success in selecting the (I) Fund at times when it was more likely to produce greater gains then the (C) or the (S) Funds. Trying to find out its Fair Value is more technical then what I do.

Second question is, does the EFA discount against EAFE have any implications for I fund against EAFE? (are your numbers "they owe us vs. we owe them" related at all to discount value of I against EAFE? do we have any way to figure out the current discount?)

The tracking that I do is a simplified method of comparing the EFA YTD Percentages vs. the (I) Fund YTD Percentages, then, translate those differences into TSP Cents. I know nothing of Discounts or of Premiums associated with neither the EFA or EAFE Index. If you could take away the costs of Currency Exchange, Fair Value, Dividends, Premiums and Discounts from my figures, maybe you would have covered all the reasons for their differences. By looking at the Links you provided, you reconfirmed for me the reason why I never dove into this so deeply in the first place. It was too complicated for me to grasp the vast amounts of reasons for the differences between the two. However, I utilize those broad based differences to detect an entry point in the (I) Fund. When the Overpayment is at it lowest or the Deficit is at its highest, is the best time to enter the (I) Fund while being within a "Stable Bull Market". Since volitility can make for huge swings in the O/D Tracker and being in a Bear market represents more downs then ups, the O/D Tracker hasn't been all that useful. So I await stability to come back first, in hopes that the Tracker is found useful in both knids of markets.

It took me a lot of work to get image down to acceptable size dimensions and KB, much harder for me than KevinD makes it out to be, but at least I got this much worked out-even if I'm doing it the hard way (probably am)

In accordance to the chart you've provided, it would appear that there is a Error Margin listed as {+0.87%}. Should this be a YTD Error Figure, then I would subtract the margin from my YTD Overpayment Percentage {+1.54%} and that would tell me that all "other" cost, fees, etc.... would come to {+0.67%} year to date. But lets not forget that the Fund Managers have been Infusing Money into the Funds by as much as +2%, then pulling it out, then adding it back in again. Its the Infussion part that gives the funds the necessary flexability to offset tremendous loses and extraordinary gains during this time of uncertainty. This is BGI's attemp to level the playing field.

Based on my lack of experience and knowledge of the particulars which are associated between and differ from the EFA and MSCI EAFE Index, I am not qualified to give you the 100% etched in stone answer you deserve. But as I said earlier, I did my best. I only wish I could have done more ! :(
 
Those With Sense of History May Find It’s Time to Invest !

In 1999, technology companies with no earnings or sales were valued at billions of dollars. But this time was different, investors told themselves. The Internet could not be missed at any price. They were wrong. In 2000 and 2001 technology stocks plunged, erasing trillions of dollars in wealth. Now investors have again convinced themselves that this time is different, that the credit crisis will push economies worldwide into the deepest recession since the Depression. Fear runs even deeper today than greed did a decade ago.

But in their panic, investors are ignoring 60 years of history. Since the Depression, governments have become far more aggressive about intervening when credit markets seize up or economies struggle. And those interventions have generally succeeded. The recessions since World War II, while hardly easy, have been far less painful than the Depression. Now some veteran investors, including G. Kenneth Heebner, a mutual fund manager who has one of the best long-term track records on Wall Street, say that the sell-off has gone much too far and stocks are poised to rally powerfully if the downturn is less severe than investors fear.

“The fact is, there are a lot of tremendous bargains out there,” said Mr. Heebner, who manages about $10 billion in several mutual funds. Indeed, by many measures stocks are as cheap as they have been in the last 25 years. He pointed to Chesapeake Energy, a natural gas producer that he owns in his CGM Focus mutual fund. In July, Chesapeake traded for $63 a share. On Friday, it fell as low as $11.99. He says that investors with a stomach for risk and a long time horizon should consider following Warren E. Buffett, who in the last three weeks has invested $8 billion in Goldman Sachs and General Electric.

Mr. Heebner expects world economies to contract over the next year. But he said the market plunge in the last week was no longer being driven by rational analysis. Stocks are probably falling because of a combination of panic and forced selling by hedge funds that must meet margin calls from their lenders, he said. Mr. Heebner’s funds have not avoided the carnage this year. The CGM Focus fund is down about 42 percent so far in 2008. But his long-term track record is impressive. In the decade that ended Dec. 31, 2007, CGM Focus rose 26 percent a year, including reinvested dividends, making it among the best-performing mutual funds. Mr. Heebner is not alone in his optimism.

“I think in years to come — I wouldn’t say months to come — we will perceive this as being a great value-buying opportunity,” said David P. Stowell, a finance professor at Northwestern and a former managing director at JPMorgan Chase. “Two and three years from now, it will seem very smart.” Even before their jaw-dropping plunge of the last month, stocks were not expensive by historical standards, based on fundamentals like earnings and cash flow. Now, after falling 30 percent or more since early September, stocks in stalwart, profitable corporations like Nokia, Exxon Mobil and Boeing are trading at nine times their annual profits per share or less. Many smaller companies are even cheaper. Some of those stocks are trading at five times earnings or less.

Those ratios are historically low. Over all, the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index is trading at about 13 times its expected profits for 2009, its lowest level in decades. In contrast, at the height of the technology bubble in early 2000, the stocks in the S.& P. traded at about 30 times earnings, the highest level ever. At the same time, the 10-year Treasury bond paid about 6 percent interest, compared with less than 4 percent today. Investors have fled stocks in favor of government bonds, insured bank deposits and other low-risk investments because they are deeply afraid of the worldwide economic crisis, said Stephen Haber, an economic historian and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. But he said he believed that fear might have gone too far.

“If there is good and wise policy, and government moves effectively, this need not play itself out in ways like the Great Depression, which is the image that is playing itself out in people’s mind,” Mr. Haber said. Government action typically does not work immediately, and banking crises around the world often require multiple interventions, he said. Still, optimists remain in the minority on Wall Street. Most investors seem to believe that the credit crisis will do substantial damage to stocks and overall economic activity. “We have never before seen for such sustained periods of time such a sustained turn away from risk taking,” said Steven Wieting, the chief United States economist for Citigroup. “This has broken out of the boundaries we’ve seen.” Economic activity appears to have slowed sharply in September, Mr. Wieting said.

The panic last week took the biggest toll on financial companies, as well as companies that are highly leveraged. But stocks fell 10 to 30 percent even for companies typically thought to be resistant to economic downturns, like the manufacturers of consumer staples. For example, Newell Rubbermaid fell to $12.82 on Friday from $17.34 on Oct. 1, a 26 percent decline in 10 days. Newell Rubbermaid now trades at its lowest levels since 1990, and just eight times its expected earnings for next year. Yet Newell Rubbermaid, whose brands include Calphalon, is profitable and insulated from the credit crisis, said William G. Schmitz Jr., who follows household products companies for Deutsche Bank. “There’s really no balance sheet risk,” Mr. Schmitz said. The company also pays a 6 percent dividend. Newell Rubbermaid said in July that it would earn $1.40 to $1.60 a share for 2008, excluding restructuring charges. For 2009, stock analysts predict it will make $1.53 a share. And while a slowing economy may mean that people will be buying fewer products from Newell Rubbermaid, the recent plunge in oil prices will reduce its costs, Mr. Schmitz said. “The way the stock’s reacted, you’d think they were going out of business,” he said.

Martin J. Whitman, a professional investor for more than 50 years, said that as long as economies worldwide could avoid an outright depression, stocks were amazingly cheap. Mr. Whitman manages the $6 billion Third Avenue Value fund, which returned 10.2 percent annually for the 15 years that ended Sept. 30, almost two percentage points a year better than the S.& P. 500 index. The fund is down 46 percent this year. “This is the opportunity of a lifetime,” Mr. Whitman said. “The most important securities are being given away.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/12/business/12stox.html?ref=business
 
Is your annuity safe?
By Walter Updegrave, Money Magazine senior editor
October 10, 2008 5:18 pm

Question: I have $100,000 in an annuity with AIG that my mom and I depend on for income to live. Should I cash it out even though I would suffer a loss, or do you think I should hold onto it? It’s so hard to know what to do. —Kitty Schwartz, Plano, Texas

Answer: Most people buy an annuity at least in part because they see it as a refuge, an investment they can count even if the financial markets are spiraling downward. But that faith has been tested in recent weeks. The government needed to step in to cover the debts of AIG, the nation’s largest insurer, and the health of many other major insurers has been called into question. So it’s no surprise that I have been inundated with questions from people worried about the security of money they have in annuities. I would love to be able to give a simple reassurance. But annuities are often complicated products. I’ll try to lay out the most important issues surrounding that choice as best I can. To do that, however, you first must understand the safety mechanisms that are in place for annuities so you can better gauge the risk you actually face (which for many people will be a lot less than they fear). And you must also understand the possible consequences of withdrawing your money from an annuity.

3 lines of defense
Basically, there are three lines of defense that protect the money you have in an annuity. The first is oversight. Insurance companies are regulated at the state level, and the main job of each state’s insurance commissioner is to assure that the companies headquartered in that state have enough reserves, or capital, to meet their obligations to annuity owners and other policy holders. The second line of defense becomes a factor when insurers run into trouble despite the oversight. Specifically, the state insurance commissioner steps in, do anything from arranging for a takeover of the ailing insurer to transferring annuities and other policies to a healthy insurer. The third line of defense is the network of state guaranty funds, a factor if a failed insurer doesn’t have enough in assets to cover obligations annuity holders. Most states cover up to $300,000 for life insurance death benefits, $100,000 in cash surrender values for life insurance and $100,000 in withdrawal and cash value for annuities, although some states have higher limits. This coverage is per person per insurance company. So if the state limit for annuities is $100,000 and you have a $100,000 annuity with one insurer and another $100,000 with a different insurer, you would receive $100,000 of coverage for each annuity. A quick note about variable annuities. Most people who own variable annuities have their money invested in one or more “subaccounts,” or mutual fund-like stock or bond funds. The money in these subaccounts is segregated from the insurer’s assets and cannot be tapped by the insurer or its creditors. So while the market value of your variable annuity may decline, the money you’ve invested in a variable annuity would be safe should the insurer fail. (If you have invested in the variable annuity’s “fixed” account, that money is part of the insurer’s assets and would be covered by the guaranty fund.) So if your annuity’s value is within your state guaranty fund’s coverage limit, you don’t need to bail out to protect yourself from a loss. That’s not to say you might not want to get out at some point in the future for peace of mind or if you decide annuities aren’t for you. But you don’t have to exit in a rush, which might trigger taxes and penalties. Your money is secure. What if the value of your annuity exceeds these limits? In that case, you’ve got a few factors to consider.

Consider your insurer’s financial strength
Assessing the financial strength of your insurer is difficult if you’re not an insurance analyst. But you can get a feel for it by checking how highly your insurer is rated by ratings companies like A.M. Best, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s. (It’s important that you have the exact name of your insurer, as there may be multiple subsidiaries with similar-sounding names, each of which is rated separately. The name of the insurer that issued your annuity should be on your contract.) Granted, these ratings are hardly foolproof. Rating agencies can get it wrong. And rapidly deteriorating markets can make what was a sound company weeks ago vulnerable today. It’s hard to draw a dividing line between what rating represents an acceptable level of safety and what rating doesn’t. But I think it’s reasonable that someone relying on an annuity for security would want to see a rating of A or better. (The rating scales vary somewhat between companies, but A is usually the third highest rating, after AAA and AA.).

Weigh the taxes and penalties
You’ve also got to consider withdrawal penalties. Most annuities carry surrender charges that typically start at 7% or so and decline gradually each year until they disappear after seven years. In some cases, however, surrender charges can run as high as 20% and last 20 years. If you pull money out early, you could take a sizeable hit. There is a bit of a loophole here, though. Most insurers allow you to withdraw a small amount - usually 10% of your balance - free of surrender charges each year. Taxes are another consideration. If you withdraw money from an annuity, you’ll owe tax at ordinary income tax rates on any gains (and on your original investment if your annuity is held within an IRA account funded with tax-deductible or pre-tax dollars.) If you’re under age 59 ½, you’ll pay an additional 10% early withdrawal tax. There is a way around the tax hit. Instead of just pulling your money out of the annuity, you can do what’s called a 1035 exchange into another annuity. In fact, you can do a 1035 exchange and split your money among two or more insurers with good ratings to diversify your exposure. You’ll still be in an annuity, of course. So if your goal is to exit the annuity altogether, this tactic wouldn’t help. A 1035 exchange also doesn’t exempt you from any surrender charges that may apply. And, indeed, by moving to a new annuity, you would likely start the clock again on a new set of surrender fees, which could make a future exit more costly than getting out today. Bottom line: If your annuity’s value is over your state’s guaranty fund limit, you’ve essentially got to weigh the cost of getting out vs. the risk of staying in. If you have an annuity with a highly rated insurer and the surrender charges are still quite high, you might prefer to just hold on at least for now, especially if your annuity’s value isn’t that far above the guaranty fund’s limit. You can always pull money out later on or move it to another insurer via a 1035 exchange after the surrender charge has fallen.
You could even reduce your exposure above the guaranty limit gradually by taking advantage of the annual surrender-free withdrawal provision. If, on the other hand, the insurer has a low rating or you’re really worried about a loss and the surrender penalty isn’t too severe, you might want to switch via a 1035 exchange to an annuity with a highly-rated insurer, especially if the annuity’s value is well above the guaranty coverage. If the insurer’s rating is low and the surrender penalty is still high, you could also consider doing a partial 1035 exchange - that is, move enough of your current annuity to an annuity with one or more highly rated insurers so that each annuity falls within or at least not too far above your state’s guaranty fund limits. You would still have to pay a surrender charge, but at least it would be on only a portion of your annuity’s value. All this comes down to a personal judgment. But I think that ultimately, if you’re going to own annuities, you want to have your money spread among two or more insurers and, to the extent possible, below the guaranty fund limit for your state. You don’t have to get to this position overnight. But the weaker your current insurer is and the higher above the guaranty limits you are, then it seems to me the sooner you want to do this.

http://asktheexpert.blogs.money.cnn.com/2008/10/10/is-your-annuity-safe/
 
The market's latest frame of mind seems reminiscent of a passage from Emily Dickinson's poem "After Great Pain a Formal Feeling Comes".

This is the Hour of Lead -
Remembered, if outlived,
As Freezing persons recollect the Snow -
First - Chill - then Stupor - then
the letting go.
 
Back
Top