Relentless

How much further can we rally without a meaningful correction? Since the March low was put in this market has been rife with bear traps.

Yes, we were seriously oversold in March. But it's not like it was without reason. We had seen some serious shockwaves to the system. A rally was to be expected. Sentiment was solidly bearish. We were due.

Some will tell us that the market looks out 6 months ahead and trades accordingly. We are now in the 6th month since the March 9th low. Next week Wednesday with be exactly 6 months. In theory the market reacts to the future based on anticipated economic fundamentals. Most market data in the past 6 months, if it's been positive, has probably been positive more because of how far various data points have dropped and were due for some relief rather than pointing to an improving fundamental picture. This is my opinion. We've had various economic bubbles blown over many years. How can any reasonable economist say that this kind of stimulus can simply correct in a much shorter time frame?

One thing is for sure, it's obvious that market manipulation can prolong a given economic environment for a long time. Given this fact, trying to time the market based on economic fundamentals can be a real challenge.

And this is where the Seven Sentinels come in. We need a filter to help discern direction. There are many of them out there, but I've adopted this one.

This past Friday, the Seven Sentinels issued a buy signal. This meant that all seven signals flashed a buy simultaneously. Historically, a buy signal from this system means that we can expect higher prices over the Intermediate Term. Of course, by the same token a sell signal is suppose to mean the same thing in reverse. When a sell signal is given prices should drop over the Intermediate Term. For the past few months however, the Intermediate Term has gotten shorter. The signals are coming faster then they typically should. I take this to mean that the market environment is atypical. Something is causing these signals to occur at a faster rate. I believe that "something" is and has been the underlying bearish sentiment. And that sentiment has no reason to change in my opinion.

I believe much of that negative sentiment is rooted in all of the events of the past year. Simply put, many Americans are outraged and angry. Many Americans are out of work. Many Americans are incensed at an administration that arrogantly wags their collective finger at their constituents and tells them that only they (the Government) know what's best for the country. Many Americans are upset that the very crooks that got us into this mess are largely getting a free pass.

I can go on of course. But I think I've made my point. The message boards pretty much reflect this sentiment.

So with that backdrop in mind, let's look at the Seven Sentinels.

$NAMO.jpg
Each of these charts shows that the signal has now crossed above the 6-day exponential moving average. That constitutes a buy signal.
$TRIN.jpg
$TRIN and $TRINQ are also flashing buy signals as they are below their 13-day exponential moving averages.
$BPCOMPQ has crossed above the lower bollinger band, which constitutes a buy.

So as you can see all seven are in buy territory at the same time, which gives me the go ahead to enter the market. But before I declare my final decision, I'd like to go over some other thoughts.

$BPCOMPQ.jpg

I took a closer look at $BPCOMPQ, or perhaps I should say a longer term view. Looking at the bollinger bands we can see that they are very tight right now. Especially since mid August. They also seem to have leveled off to some extent since late May and are moving in a range between 58-72 since early May. It looks toppy to me.

The point is, this buy signal does not look like a solid buy. If you look at $BPCOMPQ in the second set of slides, you can see that it hit a high of about 72.4 in mid-August, followed by a lower high of about 72.12 at the end of August. We also see a lower low was put in last week.

So I'm skeptical. And we are about to enter the toughest month of the year post labor day holiday. But wait, there's more.
Total Cash-Stock Exp ~ 2009 Chart 1.jpg
Our top 25 are still holding fast. Minor changes. Still solidly bullish.
Allocation by fund ~ 2009 Chart 1.jpg
The allocation across the funds is still pretty constant too. These are the folks who have been making money the past few months.

So what's my decision?

I'm entering an IFT on Tuesday for 100% stocks, barring a complete melt-down on Tuesday. Sentiment still supports the upside more than the downside, the SS has given a buy signal, and our top 25 are not giving in.
 
Thanks for putting in the time to give us your thoughts. I was wondering though, IYB said that a SSBS was not flashed Friday because divergences (?) have not been met. Not sure what that means, that is the part of the SS I really do not get. I would rather it be 7 on or 7 off without the divergence rules. Can you clarify this sometime? Thanks again for taking the time.

~CC
 
CrabClaw;bt469 said:
Thanks for putting in the time to give us your thoughts. I was wondering though, IYB said that a SSBS was not flashed Friday because divergences (?) have not been met. Not sure what that means, that is the part of the SS I really do not get. I would rather it be 7 on or 7 off without the divergence rules. Can you clarify this sometime? Thanks again for taking the time.

~CC

Yes, Don is reflecting my own trepidation with his personal assessment of the SS. I respect Don's position on this very much. But I did take some time to try and explain why I feel the SS is issuing buys and sells the way it has these past few months. I feel strongly that the negative sentiment is pushing prices higher. I do not know when that will stop, but I do know that the underlying negativity in this market is just as relentless as the uptrend itself.

Sentiment is a different animal than technical indicators. Many traders do not use it in their assessments. I do. This is perhaps where Don and I differ in our assessments. I agree with him that the signal looks weak based on market internals. But this market has had many chances to fall apart. And it hasn't really happened. There's money to be made any time too many traders are leaning the wrong way. The last two SS signals were suspect too. But they were correct, even if they weren't consistent with what is expected leading up to a buy or sell signal.

Eventually, this will change. But I have no idea when. This market will probably continue to be challenging for quite some time for those who follow a system.

I hope this helps answer your question CC.
 
CoolHand,

To me, this market seems normal. :)

We have already passed through a 'once in a lifetime' crash. I mean, it was in some ways worse than the Great Depression crash. We have had three major lows (10/08, 11/08, 3/09) and a minor drop in July. The difference now between the Great Depression and this market is that the Great Depression gracefully fell from its third low for 16 more months. If we follow that model we will have time to run to G.

The contrarian view is political. Will the Administration just 'step away from the car' and let her reach her cruising speed. I firmly believe that this Administration is completely clueless regarding the economy. They can easily drop another wrench into the works and create another big drop. That is why I am not 100% in equities - but, I think I might overweight the internationals holdings (I Fund).

Regardless, my 'timing model' based on Administration Yak has proven faulty :p. I will not make a decisive IFT move till the market moves. We seem to be at a standard inflection point. Why be a 100% or 100% out when we are at a balance point.

The S&P was a bloated bubble at 1500, it was a screaming buy at 666, it is probably in a normal range at 1000 - 1100. Now we wait for our economy to grow.:)
 
Back
Top