RealMoneyIssues
Well-known member
Re: hi
Top 5/10 in stocks on TSP Ocean's list, follow the link. Seasonality is posted on the TSP Commentary, follow the link. The numbers are in %, but I don't always put the symbol... still playing with it.
Long = Equities (pick your poison, C, S, or I) - Bull ETF
Short = Bonds(F Fund) - Bear ETF
Safe = Cash(G fund) - Well, Cash
I haven't actually started using the weights yet, but those are the ones I am considering... I will make a calculation soon, just haven't taken the time to do it yet. The hardest signals are the user ones because not all of them post their signals in an easy place so I have to read their thread religiously. Some put it in their signature, making it real easy to find
True, mainly because I trust that one more... The weighting is in it's infancy, don't read into it too much
I've been looking at this for the last few days but haven't seen any explanation of the numbers, i.e. Top 5, Top 10, Seasonality? Or the numbers you include in some of the cells. Did I miss it somewhere? I assume "safe" is equivalent to G/F funds?
Top 5/10 in stocks on TSP Ocean's list, follow the link. Seasonality is posted on the TSP Commentary, follow the link. The numbers are in %, but I don't always put the symbol... still playing with it.
Long = Equities (pick your poison, C, S, or I) - Bull ETF
Short = Bonds(F Fund) - Bear ETF
Safe = Cash(G fund) - Well, Cash
I imagine you are creating an aggregate value of some kind (given you have "weights" applied) that you can use to create Long/Short signals for your own use. You are well on the way to a quantifiable and testable type system...so long as all of your components keep regularly reporting their own signals. The real down side I see is knowing when the other systems make changes.
I haven't actually started using the weights yet, but those are the ones I am considering... I will make a calculation soon, just haven't taken the time to do it yet. The hardest signals are the user ones because not all of them post their signals in an easy place so I have to read their thread religiously. Some put it in their signature, making it real easy to find

Also I see that you have one column with a weight of "50". That's an awfully heavy weighting compared to the other components. Even if all other components are in agreement, opposite to that one component, you will only have a perfectly divided 50/50 "score".
True, mainly because I trust that one more... The weighting is in it's infancy, don't read into it too much
