The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
Yes it's there, but they never mention DRILLING there or on land with the exception of Alaska. Why are the not pressing for more exploration on the Continent? Why do they ignore this wealth of Oil right here in the USA? Are we trying to save it to use when/if the BIG CRUNCH comes? This is probably one that the TREE HUGGERS are most opposed to and would have no chance passing? I wonder if Sarah Palin knows about this?
LIKE I'VE SAID ON MANY OCCASION "THERE IS NO OIL SHORTAGE"! DRILL BABY DRILL!! View attachment 4751
Just like everything else we did NOTHING to get rid of Little Hitler #2, now he will hit us when we are down. What can we do, nothing!! NO NO CITGO!!What happens if Hugo Chavez really does cut us off. Japan bombed Peral Harbor when we put the squeeze on them or at least they felt like we were squeezing them. Will we bomb Caracas Venezuela?
We are in a weak position with our dependence on oil. I say double the strategic reserve.
Bomb Venezuela? I know you had your tongue firmly in cheek, but please, God in Heaven, no! Our government leaders are showing themselves to be almost criminally short-sighted. But we're already at war in two separate places in the globe. If you add a third, what do you call that. Does that meet the definition of a world war?What happens if Hugo Chavez really does cut us off. Japan bombed Peral Harbor when we put the squeeze on them or at least they felt like we were squeezing them. Will we bomb Caracas Venezuela?
We are in a weak position with our dependence on oil. I say double the strategic reserve.
fabijo,It has to do with Kissinger making the deals with the Arabs that they'll only accept U.S. dollars for their oil and we won't flood the world with oil. It gives our dollar strength while we can keep our interest rates pretty low. The world's nations need to keep reserves of dollars. The countries who did not buy into the plan - Iraq and Iran. In June, Iran announced that it will absolutely refuse U.S. dollars for their oil.
The Energy non-Crisis - Lindsey Williams
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147
fabijo,
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, for the video above!!!!
Its scary as he**, also lengthy - but maybe the best review I've ever heard!
It brought so many thoughts together for me, current events, recent, further past and longer past!! Wow!
So much all of a sudden begins to make sense, and still haven't fully realized/been able to fully absorb/comprehend. :worried:
One question:
Where in the world [literally], to go?
NewEnergyNews welcomes Anne B. Butterfield of DAILY CAMERA as a biweekly contributor.
-------------------
Cheney in a chignon
Anne B. Butterfield
September 7, 2008 (Daily Camera)
With intense fanfare, crowds at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul roared "Drill here! Drill now!" Some wore hardhats and safety vests emblazoned with images of caribou nestling up to pipelines. It was a drilling cult festival with Gov. Sarah Palin, her hair done up in a high, puffy chignon known as a beehive, as their newly crowned princess.
John McCain was just this guy they could interrupt during his speech to keep up the roar for more drilling.
When it comes to oil that lady is Dick Cheney in a chignon. She tackled big oil in Alaska by threatening to evict major companies from their leases because they had sat on them fruitlessly for decades. She then slapped a windfall profit tax on them and rejected their plans to own the new natural gas pipeline.
Palin's colleagues have worried that she drove too hard a bargain, making it not profitable enough for the companies which can build big enough to draw out large supplies, and which also require high profits to stay in the high risk ventures. But Queen Sarah has also given large incentives to drill for more oil, up to half a billion in "contribution" from Alaska to the company winning the license.
Thomas Freidman of the New York Times sums it up dryly, "Palin's much ballyhooed confrontations with the oil industry have all been about who should get more of the windfall profits not how to end our addiction."
He's right. Palin's windfall profit tax has added $1,200 into the pocket of each Alaskan to help them meet oil prices, which is how many Alaskans still tragically heat their homes. Even Palin's Republican critics have complained this rebate provides no incentive to economize or make changes.
The handouts are cash in hand for Alaskans so they can stay committed to carbon-based fuels, and no renewable portfolio standard exists in Palin's state. On the up side, the state has created a weatherization rebate and programs to promote efficiency. To serve her cities and remote villages, Palin should use every legislative tool of Colorado's to reap the state's rich wind energy, fast.
If you put together Palin's record with McCain's you get bats in the belfry: tax incentives and gifts for fossil fuels as well as high consumption of same, but no tax credits for renewable energy, and a bunch of technical lies or ignorance. Like McCain, Palin is woefully out of date, dismissing alternative energy solutions as "far from imminent and would require more than ten years to develop."
She's got it backwards. The new sources of fossil fuels take serious time to get to market, and wind turbines are the fastest way to get new megawatts onto the grid. A drive on I-80 through Iowa will surprise any regular driver (like your humble scribe) in its town of Adair which has been transformed in the 31 days of this August with 11 new wind turbines, or a megawatt a day.
Our panhandle prophet T. Boone Pickens has paid a bundle in television ads to remind us that the fast way out of our energy crunch is with wind and natural gas to power homes and cars. On oil, he drawls: "Drill, drill, drill but the debate misses the point -- you're still dependent on oil." He knows that any effort to enable oil at the center of our lives is fooling around.
In spite of delivering product a good ten years from now, Palin's new pipeline is in fact a boon because natural gas, the cleanest of the fossil fuels, can provide the quick-start reserve power that partners well with the variability of wind and solar on the grid, and it can power existing, converted cars. Natural gas is one key lubricant of our energy transformation. Palin has contributed to the future of energy, but overall she's favoring the past as she does with her hairstyle. And John McCain is still muttering about nuclear energy even as the technology for "new nuclear" has been stayed for lack of hundreds of design certifications and always has been the slowest to install. Nuclear and its party date clean coal are as slow and unpromising as John McCain's athletic future. It you want fast results, focus on wind and natural gas, and tell the Governor of Alaska.
I remember gas prices in 79, the year I got out of college. I was working with a guy from Texas that summer who had worked in the oil fields. He said during the embargo of the early 70's the US oil fields were burning pumped oil (actually, it may have been the natural gas co-produced) literally, for lack of storage room, AND LAUGHING as they watched it burn, saying "BURN,BABY, BURN!
fabijo,
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, for the video above!!!!
Its scary as he**, also lengthy - but maybe the best review I've ever heard!
It brought so many thoughts together for me, current events, recent, further past and longer past!! Wow!
So much all of a sudden begins to make sense, and still haven't fully realized/been able to fully absorb/comprehend. :worried:
One question:
Where in the world [literally], to go?
When I first saw how long it was, I thought I wouldn't watch it, but I just couldn't stop watching once I started. It's pretty crazy. I'm glad it put things together for you.
>The Energy non-Crisis - Lindsey Williams
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...74697167011147
I posted these 8 videos of Mr Williams about 6 months ago and was heavily criticized as to the facts he was stating was BS, by a certain know it all here, of all the oil situations in this country..Fab,
I thought the same thing (75 min?), but I emailed it all around to friends, anyway. I Even told them the same - that once you start watching it, you won't be able to stop!
VR![]()
I posted these 8 videos of Mr Williams about 6 months ago and was heavily criticized as to the facts he was stating was BS, by a certain know it all here, of all the oil situations in this country..
I'm glad you brought him back to fore front..Hope you don't get chastised like I did.
Chavez will love it if we bomb his country, it will "prove" every paraoid speech he's given, and let him know he *matters* to us, and he'll pull Russia into it.Bomb Venezuela? I know you had your tongue firmly in cheek, but please, God in Heaven, no! Our government leaders are showing themselves to be almost criminally short-sighted. But we're already at war in two separate places in the globe. If you add a third, what do you call that. Does that meet the definition of a world war?
Okay, deep breath .....
Lady