Silverbird
Well-known member
Tariffs, yes, we could do that....but then all the other countries that signed onto the same agreements would do the same thing. High tariffs do not work, especially when they are on raw materials. Everyone ends up stabbing everyone else. And there are materials that we do not have in this country: Platinum (used in catalytic converters and natural gas tanks), Tantalum, Bauxite....well, suffice it to say, the holders could just put on a 100% tariff and we would have to eat it to produce what we want.
The problem with low wages and no regulations in answer to competition is then there are incentives to cut corners. Ask the Chinese about this one, they are going through it now. They tried to get around it earlier by strengthening their currency and buying dollars, leaving them holding the bag let's say. Let the buyer beware is the death of free trade - if you don't know what you are getting is what it says it is, there is no trust in buying. I argue for sensible and strong regulations in product quality, backed with neutral and factual data. We are beginning to slide into this one, we have had a couple of domestic food scandals brought on by mistakes and/or bad actors. If US products are seen as junk the Chinese will win, frankly they can produce questionable junk for a lot cheaper than we can, and their brand names will be just as good as ours. And there's no reason to innovate if anyone can sell a knockoff and the buyer can't trust yours is better!
I also argue if your workers cannot afford to buy what they need because their wages rise less than 2% a year, and the highest returns are in playing the housing market, and they are offered low interest rate loans by loan flippers to buy houses in the sky that work as a piggy bank, you get what we have now.
If there was a simple solution, I'd think someone would have found it by now and implemented it, whether us or some other country. So far haven't seen it.
The problem with low wages and no regulations in answer to competition is then there are incentives to cut corners. Ask the Chinese about this one, they are going through it now. They tried to get around it earlier by strengthening their currency and buying dollars, leaving them holding the bag let's say. Let the buyer beware is the death of free trade - if you don't know what you are getting is what it says it is, there is no trust in buying. I argue for sensible and strong regulations in product quality, backed with neutral and factual data. We are beginning to slide into this one, we have had a couple of domestic food scandals brought on by mistakes and/or bad actors. If US products are seen as junk the Chinese will win, frankly they can produce questionable junk for a lot cheaper than we can, and their brand names will be just as good as ours. And there's no reason to innovate if anyone can sell a knockoff and the buyer can't trust yours is better!
I also argue if your workers cannot afford to buy what they need because their wages rise less than 2% a year, and the highest returns are in playing the housing market, and they are offered low interest rate loans by loan flippers to buy houses in the sky that work as a piggy bank, you get what we have now.
If there was a simple solution, I'd think someone would have found it by now and implemented it, whether us or some other country. So far haven't seen it.
Last edited: