mlk_man's account talk

Status
Not open for further replies.
imported post

I'm often imitated but never duplicated. :cool:

Just remember, womanizing has consequences (I got a number this weekend, and I don't remember how - I wound up calling it and the woman thinks I'm cool). :shock:
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
I'm often imitated but never duplicated. :cool:

Just remember, womanizing has consequences (I got a number this weekend, and I don't remember how - I wound up calling it and the woman thinks I'm cool). :shock:
Bathroom wall? :P
 
imported post

No, definitely not one of those. I think it was a thirty-something blonde. :shock:
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
No, definitely not one of those. I think it was a thirty-something blonde. :shock:
You think huh? Ahhh, the good ole' days.................:^
 
imported post

Gee, I wonder who the one person is that's been lurking around "invisible"? As if I didn't know.............Must have someting to "hide"................:^
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
Maybe it's the blonde and she wants investment advice. :D
LOL, and I'm SURE you told her you are a big time investor now too huh? :cool:

Are you getting business cards made up? :^
 
imported post

Transfering from 100% G to 100% S effective at COB today............
 
imported post

I told her I was up over 8% on the year in spite of a consolidating market for several months. She seemed rather impressed by that. Of course, I didn't tell her about the market gains in the past month (nor did I mention your returns, since she'd wonder why I was mentioning someone else with the same name, and she'd probably think it was another personality of mine - which you very well could be... there could be a rip in the space-time continuum, and an older version of myself could be on this board investing and thinking like I do - in the future :shock:). What she doesn't know can't hurt her. :^

Think I can close the deal if I bring up support levels and resistance lines? She mentioned being talented at something, but if I say what that is, this thread would go from PG-13 (the bikini turkey) to R in a hurry (think Clinton presidency). :D

I'm torn between moving my money back in tomorrow or waiting out the first half of December. Aside from the one-day drop we had due to Greenspan, we haven't seen a pullback yet. Yet I'm not sure if I want to try to time that (although part of me desperately wants to - just so I can point and laugh at Tom and say "Where's your sense of preservation, man?" in a hippie voice). Decisions, decisions.
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
I told her I was up over 8% on the year in spite of a consolidating market for several months. She seemed rather impressed by that. Of course, I didn't tell her about the market gains in the past month (nor did I mention your returns, since she'd wonder why I was mentioning someone else with the same name, and she'd probably think it was another personality of mine - which you very well could be... there could be a rip in the space-time continuum, and an older version of myself could be on this board investing and thinking like I do - in the future :shock:). What she doesn't know can't hurt her. :^

Think I can close the deal if I bring up support levels and resistance lines? She mentioned being talented at something, but if I say what that is, this thread would go from PG-13 (the bikini turkey) to R in a hurry (think Clinton presidency). :D

I'm torn between moving my money back in tomorrow or waiting out the first half of December. Aside from the one-day drop we had due to Greenspan, we haven't seen a pullback yet. Yet I'm not sure if I want to try to time that (although part of me desperately wants to - just so I can point and laugh at Tom and say "Where's your sense of preservation, man?" in a hippie voice). Decisions, decisions.
Mike, you had me at hello............:cool:Did she say she had a good sense of hummer? I mean humor? Sorry swsop, :P

You might want to actually mention the lastest rise and then the impending pull-back....and then the next rise. Hopefully it won't be months before the next rise.......:shock:

Big money is still in the market, I think they are just letting the little man run the show for a bit. That's why we are seeing very volatile day trading right now. I think we may see up one day and down the next for a few days, that be the case, I'll be 100% G fund at close tomorrow. My system is telling me sell the S I just bought today, so we'll see. Remember, you gotta look at the "big picture" , not just today. It was cold out today after all..............:P
 
imported post

That’s ok mlk_man I enjoy hummer “ O” I mean humor too. By the way it was cold outside, does that mean things will be heating up before year-end?Would like to start tracking my account in January. :?
 
imported post

This is definitely the most twisted account talk thread I've ever seen. I'm glad to have contributed to it. :D

And yes, actually she did - only she was more overt than that. :shock:

I've decided if I see more red arrows tomorrow morning, I'll dive back in at the lower prices. I'm keeping a wary eye on the foreign markets - they were down today, and our market basically followed.
 
imported post

Twisted? I prefer to call it "a breath of fresh air"....................These boards can get a little "stuffy" sometimes............The market is stressful enough, you gotta relax and smile once in awhile. If I can help with that, cool. Come into my board, take your shoes off and chillllllllllllllllllllllll. :^ Oh, foot spray is under the sink in the bathroom..........:h

Good luck, have fun..........

M_M
 
imported post

Foot spray? I don't have athlete's foot... :P

Is this a bad sign? I was tempted the other day to start charting the interest level of women and identify them as "funds" with ticker symbols being their initials. :shock:

I think fund "ES" has been quietly bullish for awhile but had a breakout this week; "RP" looks like she's bouncing off the lower support level and is trending up a bit; and "JM"s 'sense of hummer' news resulted in an explosive buying frenzy in overnight trading, but long-term prospects appear murky. :shock:
 
imported post

swsop wrote:
By the way it was cold outside, does that mean things will be heating up before year-end?Would like to start tracking my account in January. :?
Why wait until tomorrow what we can do today? I believe it is suppose to be a bit warmer today. It will however be windy so things may be hot and cold all day ~~~~market up~~~~market down~~~~~market up...............as long as it blows up at the end, I'll be happy................:shock:
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
Foot spray? I don't have athlete's foot... :P

Is this a bad sign? I was tempted the other day to start charting the interest level of women and identify them as "funds" with ticker symbols being their initials. :shock:

I think fund "ES" has been quietly bullish for awhile but had a breakout this week; "RP" looks like she's bouncing off the lower support level and is trending up a bit; and "JM"s 'sense of hummer' news resulted in an explosive buying frenzy in overnight trading, but long-term prospects appear murky. :shock:
I think you and namor should go out sometime............:l

As far as stocks go, if you want "reliability", go with the stocks with the "biggest assets", they won't usually let you down................:i
 
imported post

Like the market, these funds are incredibly complicated.

RP: best asset structure (diversified in two areas at least :^)but features high maintenance fees... and I was quoted an entry fee in the thousands invested in"precious metals". :shock:

JM: older asset class, unclear fee structure (speculating it's low), but definitely is a service-oriented fund... a definite short-term play possibility. :shock:

ES:low-cost fund with stable long-term returns and a decent asset class but highly specialized in "rear guard" stocks. :D

Where would you set your allocation on this one, MM?

Is namor a woman? I may have missed that. :cool:
 
imported post

Mike wrote:
Like the market, these funds are incredibly complicated.

RP: best asset structure (diversified in two areas at least :^)but features high maintenance fees... and I was quoted an entry fee in the thousands invested in"precious metals". :shock:

JM: older asset class, unclear fee structure (speculating it's low), but definitely is a service-oriented fund... a definite short-term play possibility. :shock:

ES:low-cost fund with stable long-term returns and a decent asset class but highly specialized in "rear guard" stocks. :D

Where would you set your allocation on this one, MM?

Is namor a woman? I may have missed that. :cool:
Depends on your short and long term goals. Also risk tolerance..........A rule of thumb is subtract your age from 110 and this is how much you should be invested in stocks. Since you are younger than I, you should probably be mostly invested in stocks as opposed to bonds or "guaranteed" funds. Diversify, put 25% in each with a trailing stop, if one starts bringing you down, dump it before it takes you too far down.......Leave the other 25% for future investments...........or beer.................:^

Me personally, my private stocks are more "growth" oriented. Looking for something I can stick with for awhile and also increase my account balance. However, I am willing to invest short term in an attractive stock that can earn me a quick gain before I pull out. :cool:

No, namor is a guy, I think............he uses horse lingo to describe his investments........hmmm, that's scary..........:shock:
 
imported post

Horse race talk is probably a lot safer than what I just described. :shock:

75% split equally three ways with 25% set aside in alcohol securities... not a bad strategy. It looks like I'll be able to make a major play on the stable ES fund near the end of the month - that breakout in interest got my attention. :^

I think you should come up with a system that backtests for women. I thought I had one a couple years ago, but my own apathy killed it before it got off the ground. :D

Edit: that risk tolerance is easier to deal with in the stock market. :shock:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top