Market News

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. employers unexpectedly cut 85,000 jobs in December, government data showed on Friday, cooling optimism on the labor market's recovery and keeping pressure on President Barack Obama.
The Labor Department said November payrolls were revised to show the economy actually added 4,000 jobs in that month rather than losing 11,000 as initially reported. With revisions to October, however, the economy lost 1,000 more jobs than previously estimated over the two months.
 
Here's why. I wouldn't be surprised to see a serious correction, maybe even a full scale crash, after this announcement.

Hang on to yer hats, it's gonna be a bumpy ride!
 
We really need some economists in this administration to validate and substantiate these sweeping comments by the administration.

Here's why. I wouldn't be surprised to see a serious correction, maybe even a full scale crash, after this announcement.

Hang on to yer hats, it's gonna be a bumpy ride!
 
Maybe this should be in Birchtree's Account Talk?:laugh:

Biggest Rally in 76 Years Not Dead Yet as Seers See Gains Ahead

By Rita Nazareth and Whitney Kisling


data


March 11 (Bloomberg) -- Laszlo Birinyi will never forget the moment a year ago when the last ounce of confidence disappeared. Everyone from billionaire Warren Buffett to New York University Professor Nouriel Roubini was convinced that the economy was in a free-fall, that exploding deficits would devastate the dollar and that home prices were heading down as much as 20 percent.
“At turning points, the mood is always in one direction,” says the 66-year-old Birinyi, who characterized the “total conviction” of pessimists as the start of an advance that would end up making Barack Obama’s first year in office the best for shareholders in 76 years. What’s more, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, which gained 69 percent in the past 12 months, is nowhere near its peak in a rally that may persist through the next presidential election, he says.
Taking advice from Birinyi, Barton Biggs of Traxis Partners LP and Leuthold Group LLC’s Steve Leuthold would have turned $1,000 invested in the S&P 500 into about $1,690 by the one-year anniversary of the bottom this week. All of them remain bulls, saying stocks will advance as the economy gains momentum and the fastest earnings growth since 1994 lures Americans from bonds.
More than $8 trillion in U.S. government stimulus stabilized the financial system and restored $5.95 trillion to equities since March 9, 2009. Shares jumped as the Federal Reserve kept its target rate for overnight loans between banks near zero and worker productivity climbed at the fastest rate in seven years. Inflation remains contained, with consumer prices excluding food and energy costs holding below 2 percent for more than a year. Home prices increased seven straight months through December, according to S&P/Case-Shiller. [more]
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&sid=a8hMbBYSrcCE
 
Tom's Sentiment Survey looks like its getting close to flipping... lots of bulls. But then again, I just voted Bullish to try and tip the scale to buy in lower :)

We shall see tomorrow... it's on fire, Tom!
 
Citigroup Inc. today reported first quarter 2010 net income of $4.4 billion or $0.15 per diluted share, and revenues of $25.4 billion.
 
The American market seems to have too much support for an October 2008/February 2009 dive.

On the other hand, yuk :nuts:, we might be at the apex of the 'Obama Economic Miracle'. I have been waiting for that.

Regardless, it is probably safe to buy and hold
 
we might be at the apex of the 'Obama Economic Miracle'. I have been waiting for that.

Regardless, it is probably safe to buy and hold

Why fight the Fed and Treasury... it's like going against the chip leader when he has an endless supply of chips hidden under the table. As long as the US$ remains the flight to quality, it is a winner's game... PERIOD. If the $ was still backed by gold, then yeah, the tea-baggers have a valid arguement. But since the $ is backed by some pretty strong market psychology and confidence, this is the Fed freebie. What am I not getting? Please enlighten me.
 
Why fight the Fed and Treasury... it's like going against the chip leader when he has an endless supply of chips hidden under the table. As long as the US$ remains the flight to quality, it is a winner's game... PERIOD. If the $ was still backed by gold, then yeah, the tea-baggers have a valid arguement. But since the $ is backed by some pretty strong market psychology and confidence, this is the Fed freebie. What am I not getting? Please enlighten me.

The FED is reducing its influence on this economy. They are no longer buying mortgages or Treasuries. Soon they will be increasing interest rates. Their reason for existence is to support the money supply. They will have to shrink the money supply to fight inflation - or worse, stagflation.

The Treasury is broke. Much of the public will not accept further gubmint bloat and borrowing. In fact, they want it trimmed. I cannot see politicians making decisions to increase the debt load in this environment. That game is over. However, some of them will try. Their game is over.

And, Corporations will be moving stuff on balance sheet to avoid paying out dividends. After this year, folks will not want dividends because they are taxed at income rates. So, companies will move stuff around to avoid tax – thus, showing less profit (thus, less tax). It is already happening. Howdy ENRON!!!

Finally, the cost of labor is – and will continue to become – cost prohibitive. Thus, high unemployment.
 
Thanks for your reply, Boghie. I agree w/ you on many pts. and disagree with some on how it will influence the markets. I am not advocating or giving a pro-arguement for increasing the defecit. But to call it a miracle when it was planned to pump up the markets is a little far fetched. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Fed/treasury induced market pump (historically low rates) last all the way through the mid-term election. It will create a better return for TARP funds for the tax-payer and it'll buy votes with a healthy economy. There are plenty of things to keep the inflation/deflation hot/cold debate going for several quarters, especially with carriage trades influencing $ and bonds. We're probably agreeing on most parts... I'm just in the middle and you're obvioulsy on the right.
 
Thanks for your reply, Boghie. I agree w/ you on many pts. and disagree with some on how it will influence the markets. I am not advocating or giving a pro-arguement for increasing the defecit. But to call it a miracle when it was planned to pump up the markets is a little far fetched. I wouldn't be surprised to see a Fed/treasury induced market pump (historically low rates) last all the way through the mid-term election. It will create a better return for TARP funds for the tax-payer and it'll buy votes with a healthy economy. There are plenty of things to keep the inflation/deflation hot/cold debate going for several quarters, especially with carriage trades influencing $ and bonds. We're probably agreeing on most parts... I'm just in the middle and you're obvioulsy on the right.

Whoops FedGolfer,

'The Obama Economic Miracle' comment was intended to be completely tongue in cheek.

President Obama and his compliant Congress’ economic policy is the complete Jimmy Carter success story. Failed then, will fail now.

Can we survive…

Bet on it. Here comes a Reagan…

But, for now, grab your sweaters and Jesus Shoes because you will be shivering in the winter and walking to work. What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, eh…
 
Back
Top