James48843
Well-known member
Remember back when I was tracking the "LAST MONTH'S BEST FUND" to know when to be in stocks and when to be on the sidelines?
I'm going to start another grouping, and see how that one works out.
This caught my eye a couple of weeks ago- and I didn't say anything then- but it looks interesting today.
I wish I could back-test it and see what it gives.
It's the "LAST MONTH's BEST FUND"- but it ONLY USES THE L-Funds vs. teh G fund.
Here is last month's data:
[TABLE="class: tspStandard, width: 717"]
[TR]
[TD="class: leadingCell"]Sep
[/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-Income
0.21% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2020
0.23% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L2030 0.24% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2040
0.22%[/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2050
0.21% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]G-Fund
0.24% [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Had the "Last Months Best FUND" limited to L and G been in effect- we would have switched to "G" last month.
Pretty crazy, isn't it?
I'm going to start another grouping, and see how that one works out.
This caught my eye a couple of weeks ago- and I didn't say anything then- but it looks interesting today.
I wish I could back-test it and see what it gives.
It's the "LAST MONTH's BEST FUND"- but it ONLY USES THE L-Funds vs. teh G fund.
Here is last month's data:
[TABLE="class: tspStandard, width: 717"]
[TR]
[TD="class: leadingCell"]Sep
[/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-Income
0.21% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2020
0.23% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L2030 0.24% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2040
0.22%[/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]L-2050
0.21% [/TD]
[TD="class: packed, width: 9%, align: right"]G-Fund
0.24% [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Had the "Last Months Best FUND" limited to L and G been in effect- we would have switched to "G" last month.
Pretty crazy, isn't it?