L vs do it yourself

[rokid]

imported post

Spaf wrote:

Based on what information they have released on these funds, and how they got there structure, from what analysis. And, who will supervise the funds. I have to rate the information to date as: insufficient. Rgds! :? Spaf

I agree with Spaf. TSP should provide additional information on how their consultant (Mercer Investment Consulting, Inc.)arrived at the asset allocations for the various L Funds. TSP states that they're based on Mercer's projections. However, they don't provide the projections. Since we, the TSP participants, have paid for all of those projections, it would be nice to have TSP publish them. Publishing the projections would also enable us to judgewhether Mercer Consulting knows what they're doing and to hold them accountable for their performance!

In addition,there is no mention of how to integrate non-TSP holdings into the mix. This is a serious omission for those of us who want to manage our family's portfolio as a single entity. For example, I include my wife's 401K and 403B accountswith my TSP into an integrated portfolio. Therefore, I don’t need a "black box" L Fund. However, I do need, or would like, investor education on how to construct a portfolio that meets my return needs and my risk tolerance.

End of rant. :^

 

[Dave M]

imported post

RISK -- very good point. D

 

[Dave M]

imported post

Here is a link to an article that derives a "Rebalancing Benefit" on a theoretical basis. The upshot is, rebalancing provides a benefit if the the asset classes are poorly correlated. Our C- and S-funds are well-correlated. The I-fund is the asset class available to us that has the poorest correlation with the other funds, it seems to me. We might include the F-fund, although it is what we might say negatively correlated, which is different.

The optimum frequency of rebalancing is not always clear. It depends on the standard deviation among the asset classes. In our case,monthly or quarterly rebalancing is probably good enough to realize anypotential benefit which might exist. That is because we are trading in index funds which are relatively well-behaved. We do not see huge moves in the indices such as happens in individual stocks. Our funds have less standard deviation than individual stocks.

Regular rebalancing in a buy-and-hold situation may add 1% to the return.

http://www.efficientfrontier.com/ef/996/rebal.htm

Dave

 

[rokid]

imported post

Dave,

William Bernstein's books are also worth a read.

 

[Mike]

imported post

I think the only real option one has in coming up with the "right" mix with a complicated portfolio involving multiple investment accounts is to meet with a financial planner.

If you're unwilling / unable to do that, the next best thing would be to read a lot of books / do research and come up with your own strategy. I'm probably too defensive right now, but I'm so incredibly bearish in the short term, I see no reason to be buying at this point.

 

[Birchtree]

imported post

Mike,

Pleased you feel that way - hope there are 50 million more that feel the same way.

Dennis

 

[grandma]

imported post

Has anyone received the disc that was supposed to have been mailed to each tsp participant? ...or did I miss the announcement that this had been cancelled, thus saving the tsp fund millions of dollars???

 

[Dakota]

imported post

Spaf wrote:

thurston

Based on what information they have released on these funds, and how they got there structure, from what analysis. And, who will supervise the funds. I have to rate the information to date as: insufficient. Rgds! :? Spaf

its seems to me that, There is no one fancy boy(so called) professional analyst that I would trust to Gamble my money away for me on a daily basis. I may as well put my money in G fund and go out to pasture. Thats what the governmentwant us to do anyway. They want us to die off before we can use our retirement money or social security. The L fund is definitely for the laziest, non-thinking, uninformed person to sit back and think they are doing something. Where do they get all of these odd crazy numbers from anyway. and how do they know what will do the best. If a person pays attention and reacts to the events of the market he can make as well a semi-educated guess as someone who does not care about your money. the government would rather see you go broke so they can take everything you have ever worked for and confiscate it and sell it. If you think the government is for the people, think again. by the people, think again. of the people, where have u been!!!

 

[Guest]

imported post

Since 08/01/2005 (when the L-Funds started)

I-fund5.23%
F-fund1.32%
L20401.28%
L20301.10%
L20201.06%
L20100.94%
L-Inc0.52%
G-fund0.46%
C-fund0.08%
S-fund-0.50%

 

[Sr]

imported post

El Vis wrote:

Since 08/01/2005 (when the L-Funds started)

I-fund5.23%
F-fund1.32%
L20401.28%
L20301.10%
L20201.06%
L20100.94%
L-Inc0.52%
G-fund0.46%
C-fund0.08%
S-fund-0.50%

This is more a reflection of limited asset class available with LXXXXfunds. Any one still mixingand matching US stocks, European/japanese stocks and US bonds and calling it a balanced portfolio is so out of it that it ain't funny.But it is still better than just going in and out of G and C/S funds based on S&P charts.

 

[Dakota]

imported post

Sr wrote:

El Vis wrote:

Since 08/01/2005 (when the L-Funds started)

I-fund5.23%
F-fund1.32%
L20401.28%
L20301.10%
L20201.06%
L20100.94%
L-Inc0.52%
G-fund0.46%
C-fund0.08%
S-fund-0.50%

This is more a reflection of limited asset class available with LXXXXfunds. Any one still mixingand matching US stocks, European/japanese stocks and US bonds and calling it a balanced portfolio is so out of it that it ain't funny.But it is still better than just going in and out of G and C/S funds based on S&P charts.

 

[Dakota]

imported post

nice stats but I didnt read it that way. i looked at when it started then looked at the end of the month of each fund. some lost 4,5,6 cents and two of them gained 4/6 cents. to me thats speaks g fund numbers

 

[Dakota]

imported post

also what does age and years of service have to do with catching a good bounce or losing u money tomorrow. Aggressive is aggresive losing is losing its all an semi-educated guess from day to day

 

[cowboy]

imported post

Dakota wrote:

also what does age and years of service have to do with catching a good bounce or losing u money tomorrow. Aggressive is aggresive losing is losing its all an semi-educated guess from day to day

I agree with you Dakota but what the L fund does is by it's allocation into each of the original funds is just smooth out the dips and valleys based on the time scale you have to retirement. See if you look at the L funds, the L2030 is approximately where your setting right now as far as distribution. To me agressive is playing a fund at 100%. I see many posts where the person feels one of the funds will get a bounce but very few play it to 100% with confidence than move it out and take advantage of it because of the risk.I am thinking the L funds will let me play my 100% short term timing than instead of pull all out and get caught in G fund, I have the L funds I can jump into and play them at a less voltile movement because of the low risk assessment in accordance to time. I have plenty of time. Instead of at 10:30 AM of setting there wondering how much I should put in each allocation I can just go 2040 or 2010 and watch it for several days and ifoneof the more voltile funds takes a large move, play for100%. The L 2040 fund is very agressive as it only plays a 5% G allocation. If you believe the L funds are just likeG fund your sorely mistaken. Tomorrow check your increases and compare your gain to the L2030 I think you will find that the 2030 will match close to your allocation gain you have in each fund. Plus or minus a penny. Even the L income fund is more aggressive at retirement than the G fund is. This tells me I should not be G at all unless I amsure that stocks are trending down. Which they are not at the moment and I set in the G fund today.

 

[Guest]

imported post

L-fund asset allocations for each option:

L INCOME Fund
C-fund 12%, S-fund 3%, I-fund 5%, F-fund 6%, G-fund 74%

L 2010 Fund
C-fund 27%, S-fund, 8%, I-Fund 15%, F-fund 7%, G-fund 43%

L 2020 Fund
C-fund 34%, S-fund 12%, I-fund 19%, F-fund 8%, G-fund 27%

L 2030 Fund
C-fund 38%, S-fund 16%, I-fund 21%, F-fund 9%, G-fund 16%

L 2040 Fund
C-fund 42%, S-fund 18%, I-fund 25 %, F-fund 10%, G-fund 5%

 

[robo]

imported post

Some thoughts on the L Funds......

Elvis wrote:

L-fund asset allocations for each option:

L INCOME Fund
C-fund 12%, S-fund 3%, I-fund 5%, F-fund 6%, G-fund 74%

L 2010 Fund
C-fund 27%, S-fund, 8%, I-Fund 15%, F-fund 7%, G-fund 43%

L 2020 Fund
C-fund 34%, S-fund 12%, I-fund 19%, F-fund 8%, G-fund 27%

L 2030 Fund
C-fund 38%, S-fund 16%, I-fund 21%, F-fund 9%, G-fund 16%

L 2040 Fund
C-fund 42%, S-fund 18%, I-fund 25 %, F-fund 10%, G-fund 5%


Are you beating the L Funds year to date? Compare them to your personal return.


31 Dec 2004 Share Prices 10.68/10.42/12.91/14.73/15.48

9 Sept 2005 Share Prices 11.00/10.69/13.40/15.97/16.77

Approximate returns using thetracker and the above listed percentages ....


Year To Date Returns
L2040= 5.59%

L2030 = 5.24%

L2020 =4.89%

L2010 =3.39%

The L Funds are not for me, but for some they are ok.... What is your YTD return Market Timer? If you are going to compare the L Fund to returns, you must compare to your own.......


Timing the Market with Your TSP Funds? Here's What Happened in Recent Bull and Bear Markets


http://www.fedsmith.com/articles/articles.showarticle.db.php?intArticleID=428

Lifecycle Funds: Making A "Model Retirement Program" Even Better


http://www.fedsmith.com/articles/articles.showarticle.db.php?intArticleID=665

 

[cowboy]

imported post

My thought is that Mr. Smith's first article has little to do with market timing if you look at the time frames he is using. He goes back to December 1999 and 2000 and then quotes the June - October 2002 sell off. Most TSP-ers did not try to time the market in this time period but literally paniced like so many other investors and made a wrong decision. Most of this movement had little to do with market timing or timers in my opinion.

 

[yakers]

imported post

It is a pretty old story that asset allocation and aversion to risk change as you get older. I am 55 soon and under CSRS. I have been putting the max in my TSP as long as it has been available. Earlier this year I went with a 40% G, 20% C, S & I. Just where I wanted to be. But about a month ago I went with the 2020L Fund for new contributions. It does have a little F, which I have been avoiding, but I like its balance. While there are a few Warren Buffets out there most people chasing performance (meaning trying to predict it) will not beat the market. And if too many did the market would adjust. I am now in the process of rolling an old IRA into the TSP program (anyone done this, it seems slower than transfers between regualr companies) . I will continue adding to the L Fund.I do have one other small IRA in a foreign fund and several DRIP (dividend paying) stocks. So I can take more risk elswhere.

 

[rokid]

imported post

Yakers,

It appears that you have everything under control and are sitting pretty. Congratulations.

My only question about the L Funds is why the daily rebalancing? Based on what I've read, a longer rebalancing interval is more desirable, e.g. quarterly or yearly.

In addition, if you do have substantial assets outside of TSP, e.g. a wife's 401K, it may be difficult to arrive at a desirable overall household asset allocation using the L Funds. :^

 

[yakers]

imported post

Before adding the L Fund I did put all our assets in a Morningstar profile and it looked like we slightly outperformed the market with slightly less risk. I did not run it with various elements to see the contribution of each but I suspect theoutperformance came more from the DRIP stocks which have been nice to me the last few years sinceI closed my Quick & Reily trading account(too much time and too much return went on fees, but that is another story). Another hard part for an AA is how to treat a CSRS pension (as bonds?)and my teacher wife's partially COLAd pension. I donotgoforan exact AA. I went years without a reballance but then may adjust two or three times in a year. As to the daily rebalancing Isuspect they have to do this administratively, i.e it is easier for them to calaulate it every day. I also have no reason to believe that there is a performance penalty for this. I AM very much a Vanguard diehard so I like index funds and the Lfunds look a lot like Vanguard Target funds which look good to me. I know from my old Q&R trading account that  Ican waste a lot of time trying to watch stocks and funds. A friend of mine actually made money day trading for a while for a copule years, he no longer talks about it. I like not worrying and not spending too much time watching my accounts, and as far as I can tell there is more to be lost in frequent trades than "doing  nothing".I keep an eye on these boards to see if there is a real method to outperform the market. So far I have not seen it.