Economic News

First of all, this report is pure BS IMO!

Existing-home sales rise 3.9% in February

http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Sto...5C8E-335A-4977-8344-2E867AEB2750}&siteid=mktw

The 3.9% gain was the largest since March 2004, exceeding expectations of a decline to about 6.35 million. January's sales pace was revised down to 6.44 million from 6.46 million.

Sales have risen three months in a row for the first time in three years. Sales are down 3.9% compared with a year ago.

Inventories of unsold homes rose 5.9% to 3.75 million, representing a 6.7-month supply, up from 6.6 months in January. Inventories are not seasonally adjusted.

The median price of a home fell 1.3% year-over-year to $212,800, the seventh straight monthly decline.

Favorable weather in prior months, especially in the Northeast and Midwest, probably boosted sales in February, said David Lereah, chief economist for the real estate group.

Sales rose 14.2% in the Northeast, 3.9% in the Midwest and 1.6% in the South. Sales were flat in the West.

"The recession in housing may have bottomed out in September," Lereah said, adding that he'd need a few more months of data before making a call.


Let's see, inventory is up, prices fell, January's sales revised down, and favorable weather boosted sales?

I live in the midwest and the weather was horribly cold and we had 3 snow storms. And more inventory will only add to the problem. Think about it. If the housing market is rebounding, why did Bernake change his tone?
 
They seem to revise these numbers regularly, too regularly, if this is inflationary and effects the markets expect it to be revised downward on the next report.:mad:
These guys think it's GOOD!:D
MARKET SNAPSHOT

U.S. stocks rise after housing data

By Nick Godt & Leslie Wines, MarketWatch

Last Update: 10:28 AM ET Mar 23, 2007

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- U.S. stocks rose on Friday, following news that existing home sales unexpectedly rose in February, which helped soothe investor concerns the about the housing market.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...x?guid={EE3B8F8C-81F5-4708-AB5B-3B3C7C9B4639}
 
CNN thinks it's good but "reduces the rational for any Fed easing".

Stocks spiked to morning highs within the last 30 minutes as investors received some reassurance that the housing market isn't rolling over. At the top of the hour, existing home sales unexpectedly rose 3.9% in February to an annual rate of 6.69 mln, up from 6.44 mln in January; economists were forecasting a 2.2% drop.
While the data keep home sales well above the recent bottom and ease some of the overblown fears of a housing crisis leading to recession, the report also greatly reduces the rationale for any Fed easing. That has been reflected in bonds, which have turned negative on the news, as well as stocks, which are now relinquishing much of what was just gained. As a reminder, the worst of the housing problem exists in the "new" home sales sector, not in sales of "existing" homes. New home sales, which will be out on Monday, run at close to a 1 mln annual rate, and are thus much lower than existing home sales. DJ30 +11.99 NASDAQ -1.27 SP500 +1.12 NASDAQ Dec/Adv/Vol 1181/1464/342 mln NYSE Dec/Adv/Vol 1055/1746/230 mln http://finance.yahoo.com/marketupdate/overview
 
Remember this data is released by NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. They can spin the data however they want. For the truth just look at bonds. The bond market as of now seems to believe the data. Bond prices are down and yields up.

My opinion, I can believe the inventory numbers. House are popping up everywhere here in Atlanta. Sales, I can believe also. Weather in the South has been great this winter. However, I think we will see a drop in the next report. This data came before Sub-Prime hit the news.

Tough Call
 
Well I just woke up in Hawaii went here and was greeted with this news.
Totally agree-this is B.S.
Talk about manipulating the market.

Not a thing what you can do about it.:mad:
 
Yeah, inflation is higher, so we raise interest rates?:confused: I know, I know that's the way it works, BUT ! :confused:

Fed governor warns against rate hikes

Federal Reserve Governor Frederic Mishkin says keeping inflation in check may require rate increases.

March 24 2007: 1:16 AM EDT


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- Core U.S. inflation is likely to drop to 2 percent from about 2 1/4 percent, but pushing it below that may require higher interest rates, Federal Reserve Governor Frederic Mishkin said on Friday.
"I am less optimistic about the prospects for core PCE inflation to move much below 2 percent in the absence of a determined effort by monetary policy," Mishkin said in remarks prepared for delivery to a conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Mishkin was referring to a favorite inflation gauge of the U.S. central bank - the 12-month change in the government's Personal Consumption Expenditures index with volatile food and energy costs set aside.
An advance text of Mishkin's remarks was distributed to reporters in Washington.
Mishkin said he is "reasonably optimistic" that core inflation will drift down. But the process will take a while because of the recent rebound in prices for gasoline and petroleum products, he said.
Higher fuel prices have boosted the costs of many goods and services and as firms pass costs along to customers, monthly core inflation readings will be higher than they would otherwise be, he added.
Meanwhile, Mishkin said he believes long-term inflation expectations are currently anchored at a level not far below the current rate of inflation, and bringing them down even lower would be challenging.
"A substantial further decline in inflation would require a shift in expectations, and such a shift could be difficult and time consuming to bring about," Mishkin said.
Pushing inflation expectations lower might require holding interest rates up at a level that would lead to slower economic growth and higher unemployment, he said.
"The historical record suggests that permanently lowering inflation expectations may require keeping monetary policy tight for a substantial period, resulting in considerable output and employment losses for a time," he said. (more)
http://money.cnn.com/2007/03/24/news/economy/fed_Mishkin/index.htm?postversion=2007032401
 
First of all, this report is pure BS IMO!
Let's see, inventory is up, prices fell, January's sales revised down, and favorable weather boosted sales?

I live in the midwest and the weather was horribly cold and we had 3 snow storms. And more inventory will only add to the problem. Think about it. If the housing market is rebounding, why did Bernake change his tone?


Yep, the spinning is nonstop.
 
I find it interesting that the market did not do as well as I would have thought after the "Goldilocks" housing data came out. Makes me think that the dumb money is getting smarter and did not fall for it this time. Course Ben is still concerned with inflation, growth is slowing, and earnings are weakening. IMHO we have some down side risk. Next week has a ton of data coming out. http://www.briefing.com/Investor/Public/Calendars/EconomicCalendar.htm

w
 
ECONOMIC PREVIEW
Bernanke to make annual trek to Capitol Hill woodshed

PrintE-mailDisable live quotesRSSDigg itDel.icio.usBy Rex Nutting, MarketWatch
Last Update: 12:01 AM ET Mar 25, 2007


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- It's getting to be an annual ritual for Ben Bernanke. Every spring, the Federal Reserve chairman appears at the congressional Joint Economic Committee to explain himself after totally confusing the financial markets.
Last year, Bernanke was forced to "revise and extend" some off-hand remarks he made to CNBC starlet Maria Bartiromo. This year, he'll come before the lawmakers to explain what the Federal Open Market Committee was trying to say in its latest post-meeting statement.
Bernanke's appearance on Wednesday at 9:30 a.m. will be the highlight of a very interesting week for economic news, including news about all the biggest issues of the day: inflation, housing, consumer confidence and capital spending. See Economic Calendar.
Like most of the data recently, another mixed bag is expected this coming week. While housing and capital spending will likely look much better in February than the disastrous January numbers, consumer confidence and inflation are heading in the wrong direction.
The data perfectly sum up the FOMC's judgment: the economy should be expected to grow at a modest pace, with housing continuing to drag on growth. But at the same time, core inflation will be somewhat more "elevated" than the Fed would like.


Bernanke will be called upon to make sense of the muddle of data, and to provide some clearer guidance about the future. Unfortunately, he's in the dark as much as the rest of us. Will the economy falter as the problems in the subprime mortgage market spread? Will inflation moderate as Fed officials expect? Will the Fed cut rates, or raise them?

Everyone has a forecast, but no one has a crystal ball.
The one thing Bernanke could clarify is the confusing message from the FOMC, which seemed to threaten higher rates with one hand while hinting strongly with the other hand that rates could be lowered. Bernanke has taken the ideal of a two-handed economist to an extreme. See our analysis in this Capitol Report.
As for the data, economists are looking for big rebounds in both new-home sales and durable goods orders, which had plunged in January. The expected gains in

February won't quite make up for January's declines, however.
Housing
Sales of new homes are expected to rise about 8% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.01 million in February after plunging 16.6% in January to a four-year low of 937,000. The figures will be released Monday at 10 a.m. Eastern.

These numbers are very volatile, especially in the winter months, when weather can make a big difference.
"Warmer temperatures in the West and drier conditions in the South should boost overall sales activity," wrote Dean Maki, an economist for Barclays Capital, in a weekly research note. What's more, fundamentals like low mortgage rates, "suggest further improvement."
Others think new-home sales will fall further over coming months. "We expect sales to slowly trend lower over the rest of the year," wrote Drew Matus, an economist for Lehman Bros., in the weekly outlook. "Tighter lending standards translate into fewer mortgage approvals."
Inventories of unsold homes should drop to a 13-month low of 530,000 from 536,000, according to Brian Jones, an economist for Citigroup Global Markets. Working off the inventories is the key to a recovery in the housing market.

On Tuesday, S&P will release its January home price indexes for 20 major cities. Prices were up 0.5% year-on-year for the 20-city index and flat for the 10-city index in December, the slowest price gain in 11 years. Prices were falling at an annual rate of 9% in December.
Capital spending Orders for durable goods are expected to rise 3.6% in February after sinking 8.7% in January. The figures will be reported on Wednesday at 8:30 a.m. The big story is aircraft orders, which fell 60% in January. Boeing got a big order for UPS, which should push up aircraft orders by 60%, said Matus.
The most important numbers will be for "core" orders and shipments -- that is, nonaircraft, nondefense capital equipment. Core orders dropped 6.4% in January, while core shipments fell 2.8%.

Core orders are expected to rise 1% in February, wrote David Greenlaw, economist for Morgan Stanley, in his weekly note. He expects a rebound in high-tech, which may have been "temporarily depressed" by the delays in shipping Microsoft's Vista operating system.
Capital spending remains a question mark for growth. Once upon a time, business spending was expected to make up for a weakened consumer, but capital spending fell at an annual rate of 3.1% in the fourth quarter. Citigroup's Jones expects core capital equipment shipments to rise 2% in February, which still leave the January-February total down 6.1% annualized from the fourth quarter's average.

Inflation
Core inflation accelerated in January and could do so again in February. The personal consumption price index excluding food and energy -- so-called core inflation -- rose 2.3% in the 12 months ending in January, "somewhat elevated," as the FOMC said, from the Fed's goal of 1% to 2%.
It could go higher in February. Economists are looking for a 0.3% gain in the core PCE price index, which would take the year-over-year increase to 2.4%.
The core PCE price index is taken from some of the same data used to compute the better-known consumer price index, which rose by 0.2% in February. "The underlying details suggest a stronger reading for the core PCE," said Matus of Lehman Bros.
The core PCE index gives more weight to medical prices than the CPI does, and less to housing. That's one reason the Fed prefers the core PCE over the CPI. But in February, medical care prices jumped 0.5% in the CPI. For physician services, the core PCE index uses data from the producer price index, noted Maki of Barclays.
The PPI for physicians jumped a record 2.9% in February, "posing upside risk" to Maki's 0.3% core PCE forecast.
Rex Nutting is Washington bureau chief of MarketWatch


http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...x?guid={3F944CDA-651A-4F14-80D3-9C902351E1F4}
 
Next weeks economic releases should not have as large an impact on the market as last weeks FOMC meeting. That doesn’t mean the market will not be tuned into these releases to get some insight as to the direction of the economy and potential future business profits.

On Monday March 26 a single release may capture the attention of traders. At 10:00 am et new home sales data will be released. Under normal circumstances the report would only rate a C+ for importance, but with the housing slump and the subprime mess traders will look to this report for an indication of how the housing market is performing. It is expected that the numbers will improve.

Tuesday March 28 Durable Orders will be released prior to the market opening. This is another good indicator for the economy and rates a B in importance. On Wednesday we have GDP and Chain Deflator final for Q4. Since these reports are for the 4th quarter and the info for these reports has already been release we should not be surprised by the number unless there is a significant revision.

On Friday Chicago PMI will be PMI will be released, lass month it was below 50% and they are expecting 49.5%.

Here are two links for the calendars.

http://biz.yahoo.com/c/ec/200713.html

http://www.nasdaq.com/asp/econodayframe.asp?page=http://www.nasdaq.com/econoday/index.html

On Thursday Mar 29th Bernanke will speak at 12:00 et. I really don’t expect any surprises from this direction. On Friday Gary Stern and Charles Plosser, both Fed Res Bank Pres will speak.

No real significant earnings reports are due out next week, so traders may focus on economic data.

http://www.briefing.com/Investor/Private/Calendars/EarningsCalendarWeek2.htm

One last thing, I’ve been following Bull and Bear Wise who assign a numeric value to reports as they are released and then adjust a score from 0 to 100. It now stands at 56.72. I don’t know if it works as an indicator, but I’m throwing it in for your review.

http://www.bullandbearwise.com/
 
New-home sales fall to 7-year low in February

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Sales of new-homes unexpectedly slowed again in February, falling 3.9% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 848,000, the lowest since June 2000, the Commerce Department reported Monday. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch were expecting an increase in February to about 1.00 million units. Sales were down 18.3% compared with February 2006. Inventories of unsold homes rose 1.5% to 546,000, representing an 8.1-month supply, the largest inventory in relation to sales since January 1991. The inventory is up 26.6% in the past 12 months. The median price of a new home was $250,000, down 0.3% compared with February 2006.

http://http://www.marketwatch.com/N...dateid=39167.4167464815-892235035&siteid=mktw

LOL! This feels like a referee make-up call in a NBA basketball game.:D
 
New home sales fall 3.9 pct in February

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070326/bs_nm/usa_economy_homesales_dc_1

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sales of new U.S. homes fell 3.9 percent in February to the lowest rate in nearly seven years while the number of new homes on the market grew, according to a government report on Monday that showed more signs of weakness in the housing sector.

Since we’ve been following the housing market fairly close in this thread I’m not too surprised by the number that came out today. I think somewhere along the line there was some speculation that the new home sales could suffer because home sales were falling through escrow. The numbers that were released this morning could reflect that action.
 
Don't Expect Fed Rate Cuts Any Time Soon

Last Update: 26-Mar-07 08:06 ET

The Fed has adopted a slightly less hawkish stance with the policy statement last week. That doesn't mean a rate cut is likely any time soon. In fact, economic demand is very much in line with Fed goals with rates at current levels. Inflation has not yet eased to acceptable levels. These conditions call for stable policy.

The March 21 policy statement unquestionably had a softer tone than the previous statements. The removal of the phrase that "the extent and timing of any additional firming that may be needed..." did eliminate a clear bias on the part of the Fed that the next move would probably be to raise rates again.

http://tinyurl.com/3ylgqy
 
Problems Continue in New Home Market

Last Update: 26-Mar-07 10:14 ET


New home sales remain the biggest problem child in the housing sector. February sales were well below expectations at an 848,000 annual rate. That is down 3.9% from the revised January rate of 882,000. The median sales price was down 0.3% from a year ago. Most troubling was the fact that the inventory of unsold homes rose to an 8.1 months supply from 7.3 in January.

There is no question that the new home market is in bad shape. This is a smaller market than the existing home sales market, however. Those sales ran at a 6.69 million annual rate in February. That is almost eight times as large.

The serious problems in the new home sales market are extremely troubling for the companies in this sector. They also suggest that housing construction will remain a drag on real GDP (although to a smaller degree than in recent quarters because the declines are smaller). The problems here, however, do not mean that the housing market is crashing and will pull the overall economy into recession. The broader perspective shows that housing remains in a correction, and will remain a moderate drag on real GDP for several more quarters.

Check out last week's Briefing Feature for a perspective on housing in the Northeast, Midwest, South, and West.

--Dick Green, Briefing.com

http://tinyurl.com/2l894o
 
ECONOMIC REPORT

Consumer confidence dips in March

Surge in gas prices, drop in stock market adds to sense of uncertainty

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Shaken by a steady rise in gasoline prices and a weaker stock market, U.S. consumer confidence dropped in March for the first time in five months, the Conference Board reported Tuesday.

The consumer confidence index fell to 107.2 in March from a revised 111.2 in February. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch were looking for a decline to about 108.6.

"Apprehension about the short-term future has suddenly cast a cloud over consumers' confidence," said Lynn Franco, director of the private research group's consumer research unit, in a statement.

"Despite diminishing expectations, consumers' assessment of the present-day conditions remains steady and does not suggest a weakening in economic conditions."

The present situation index rose slightly to 137.6 from 137.1 in February. It's the highest since August 2001.

The expectations index, however, fell to 86.9 from 93.8 in February. It's the lowest since August.

http://tinyurl.com/yp4am6
 
As America falters, policymakers must look ahead

By Lawrence Summers

Published: March 25 2007 18:24 | Last updated: March 25 2007 18:24
Three months ago I was able to write in this space that in economics “the main thing we have to fear is the lack of fear itself”. This is no longer true today. With clear evidence of a crisis in the subprime US housing sector, risks of its spread to other credit markets, sharp increases in market volatility, reminders of the fragility of global carry trades and signs of slowing economic growth, there is enough apprehension to go around.

While it would be premature to predict a US recession, there are now strong grounds for predicting that the US economy will slow down very significantly in 2007. Whether in retrospect 2007 will prove to have been a “pause that refreshed” a nearly decade-long expansion like the growth slowdowns in 1986 and 1995 or whether it will see the end of the expansion is not yet clear.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/fda4255c-daf1-11db-ba4d-000b5df10621.html
 
Durable goods weaker than expected +

By Joanne Morrison 53 minutes ago

Orders for U.S.-made big-ticket items were weaker-than-expected in February as the world's richest economy hit hard by troubles in the housing sector set off the year at a slower pace, a government report on Wednesday showed.

New orders for U.S.-made durable goods rose a smaller-than-expected 2.5 percent in February and, excluding volatile transportation, orders for these costlier goods meant to last more than three years, were down for the fourth time in the last five months.

The Commerce Department reported that excluding transportation orders, which are heavily skewed by aircraft, durable goods orders fell by 0.1 percent.
U.S. treasury debt prices rallied on the surprisingly weak report, while stock futures fell further and the dollar edged down.

After the report, U.S. short-term interest rate futures showed implied prospects for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by the end of June rising to 40 percent from 28 percent late on Tuesday.

The news came as a surprise to economists, who predicted this weaker showing would weigh down growth in the first quarter.

"This is very weak," said Chris Rupkey, senior financial economist at Bank of Tokyo/Mitsubishi-UFJ in New York. "This is what it looks like when we are going into a recession. I'll be surprised if we don't."

Economists polled ahead of the report were expecting overall durable goods orders to advance by 3.5 percent and by 1.6 percent, excluding transportation.

The Commerce Department revised down its figures for January, reporting a 9.3 percent decline in overall durable orders in January, first recorded as a 7.8 percent decrease.

The sharp drop in January durable goods orders reported a month ago helped spark a big sell-off in U.S. equities and raised concerns at the Federal Reserve that business spending might prove weaker than they had expected.
February weakness in nondefense capital goods orders, excluding aircraft, is likely to keep those concerns alive.

The report came just before Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was set to testify before the congressional Joint Economic Committee on Wednesday.
RECESSION SIGNAL?

In a further sign of weak demand, orders for nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft, viewed as a proxy for business spending, fell by 1.2 percent last month after declining by 7.4 percent in January. Economists were expecting a 2.3 percent gain.

"This weak report suggests that, at best, equipment spending will be flat relative to the fourth quarter, which we know was down from the third quarter. It represents a manufacturing recession but, also, just a general sense of corporate caution where business expectations fell through most of 2006," said Cary Leahey, managing director and economist at Decision Economics in New York.

The rise in overall durable goods orders could be largely attributed to an 88.4 percent surge in nondefense aircraft and parts orders and a 29.2 percent gain in defense aircraft orders. Automotive orders advanced by 1.3 percent in February.

A 0.8 percent decline in shipments in February is sure to drag down GDP growth during the quarter.

Amid a spate of troubles in the subprime mortgage market that has led to the financial collapse of numerous mortgage lending firms, separate data showed U.S. mortgage applications declined last week as refinancing dipped while purchase activity barely budged.

The Mortgage Bankers Association said its seasonally adjusted index of mortgage applications dipped 0.2 percent to 671.0 in the week ended March 23.

The MBA's seasonally adjusted purchase index climbed 0.1 percent to 411.1. Its refinancing applications index slipped 0.5 percent to 2,197.7.

Mortgage application levels are being scrutinized as rising foreclosures and other problems in the subprime mortgage market causes lenders to clamp down on loans to borrowers with weak credit.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070328/bs_nm/economy_dc_2&printer=1;_ylt=AhGul1w_2PeJJUYGldBzDSOb.HQA
 
Another example of the Liberals doing the BEST thing to ruin the Country! IMHO:mad:
This woman is frightening!

Take a good hard look at what she wants. Take special note of the last paragraph

Insanity Personified : Nancy Pelosi

Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer". "First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class".

She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time highs. What this really means is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets".

When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs". "There is no question these windfall profits and income created by the Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistrib uted to the poor and working class". "Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income to flow to the rich."

When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401K's, and the stock market she replied "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down" economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous". "How much of this 'trickle down' ever get to the unemployed and minorities in our county?
None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs."

"We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower Federal Income Tax tax payers off the roles and increase government income substantially. We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest."

When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have a n estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as "Americans"."
 
Back
Top